{"kind": "ainglish.items.v1", "sha256": "c9e218fd613c70d52e055536dc844c5904812f52dd03f07927cfa34e16d9ae82", "items": [{"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-00-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1000; harm check ingest-probe-200; observation time 2026-09-11T00:00Z; suspected fault ingest-race-300; post-change test ingest-replay-400; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1000 impact was absent under ingest-probe-200 at 2026-09-11T00:00Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1000; harm check ingest-probe-200; observation time 2026-09-11T00:00Z; suspected fault ingest-race-300; post-change test ingest-replay-400; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1000 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-200@2026-09-11T00:00Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-00"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-00", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-00-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1000; harm check ingest-probe-200; observation time 2026-09-11T00:00Z; suspected fault ingest-race-300; post-change test ingest-replay-400; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1000 impact was absent under ingest-probe-200 at 2026-09-11T00:00Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1000; harm check ingest-probe-200; observation time 2026-09-11T00:00Z; suspected fault ingest-race-300; post-change test ingest-replay-400; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1000 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-200@2026-09-11T00:00Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-00"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-00", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-01-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1001; harm check ingest-probe-201; observation time 2026-09-12T05:13Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-301; post-change test ingest-soak-401; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1001 impact was absent under ingest-probe-201 at 2026-09-12T05:13Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1001; harm check ingest-probe-201; observation time 2026-09-12T05:13Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-301; post-change test ingest-soak-401; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1001 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-201@2026-09-12T05:13Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-01"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-01", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-01-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1001; harm check ingest-probe-201; observation time 2026-09-12T05:13Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-301; post-change test ingest-soak-401; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1001 impact was absent under ingest-probe-201 at 2026-09-12T05:13Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1001; harm check ingest-probe-201; observation time 2026-09-12T05:13Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-301; post-change test ingest-soak-401; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1001 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-201@2026-09-12T05:13Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-01"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-01", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-02-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1002; harm check ingest-probe-202; observation time 2026-09-13T10:26Z; suspected fault ingest-lock-302; post-change test ingest-drill-402; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1002 impact was absent under ingest-probe-202 at 2026-09-13T10:26Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1002; harm check ingest-probe-202; observation time 2026-09-13T10:26Z; suspected fault ingest-lock-302; post-change test ingest-drill-402; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1002 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-202@2026-09-13T10:26Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-02"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-02", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-02-004", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1002; harm check ingest-probe-202; observation time 2026-09-13T10:26Z; suspected fault ingest-lock-302; post-change test ingest-drill-402; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1002 impact was absent under ingest-probe-202 at 2026-09-13T10:26Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1002; harm check ingest-probe-202; observation time 2026-09-13T10:26Z; suspected fault ingest-lock-302; post-change test ingest-drill-402; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1002 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-202@2026-09-13T10:26Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-02"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-02", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-03-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1003; harm check ingest-probe-203; observation time 2026-09-14T15:39Z; suspected fault ingest-quota-303; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-403; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1003 impact was absent under ingest-probe-203 at 2026-09-14T15:39Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1003; harm check ingest-probe-203; observation time 2026-09-14T15:39Z; suspected fault ingest-quota-303; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-403; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1003 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-203@2026-09-14T15:39Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-03"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-03", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-03-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1003; harm check ingest-probe-203; observation time 2026-09-14T15:39Z; suspected fault ingest-quota-303; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-403; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1003 impact was absent under ingest-probe-203 at 2026-09-14T15:39Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1003; harm check ingest-probe-203; observation time 2026-09-14T15:39Z; suspected fault ingest-quota-303; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-403; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1003 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-203@2026-09-14T15:39Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-03"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-03", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-04-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1004; harm check ingest-probe-204; observation time 2026-09-15T20:52Z; suspected fault ingest-backlog-304; post-change test ingest-replay-404; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1004 impact was absent under ingest-probe-204 at 2026-09-15T20:52Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1004; harm check ingest-probe-204; observation time 2026-09-15T20:52Z; suspected fault ingest-backlog-304; post-change test ingest-replay-404; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1004 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-204@2026-09-15T20:52Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-04"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-04", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-04-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1004; harm check ingest-probe-204; observation time 2026-09-15T20:52Z; suspected fault ingest-backlog-304; post-change test ingest-replay-404; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1004 impact was absent under ingest-probe-204 at 2026-09-15T20:52Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1004; harm check ingest-probe-204; observation time 2026-09-15T20:52Z; suspected fault ingest-backlog-304; post-change test ingest-replay-404; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1004 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-204@2026-09-15T20:52Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-04"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-04", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-05-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1005; harm check ingest-probe-205; observation time 2026-09-16T01:05Z; suspected fault ingest-stall-305; post-change test ingest-soak-405; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1005 impact was absent under ingest-probe-205 at 2026-09-16T01:05Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1005; harm check ingest-probe-205; observation time 2026-09-16T01:05Z; suspected fault ingest-stall-305; post-change test ingest-soak-405; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1005 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-205@2026-09-16T01:05Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-05"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-05", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-05-004", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1005; harm check ingest-probe-205; observation time 2026-09-16T01:05Z; suspected fault ingest-stall-305; post-change test ingest-soak-405; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1005 impact was absent under ingest-probe-205 at 2026-09-16T01:05Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1005; harm check ingest-probe-205; observation time 2026-09-16T01:05Z; suspected fault ingest-stall-305; post-change test ingest-soak-405; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1005 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-205@2026-09-16T01:05Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-05"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-05", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-06-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1006; harm check ingest-probe-206; observation time 2026-09-17T06:18Z; suspected fault ingest-race-306; post-change test ingest-drill-406; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1006 impact was absent under ingest-probe-206 at 2026-09-17T06:18Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1006; harm check ingest-probe-206; observation time 2026-09-17T06:18Z; suspected fault ingest-race-306; post-change test ingest-drill-406; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1006 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-206@2026-09-17T06:18Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-06"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-06", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-06-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1006; harm check ingest-probe-206; observation time 2026-09-17T06:18Z; suspected fault ingest-race-306; post-change test ingest-drill-406; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1006 impact was absent under ingest-probe-206 at 2026-09-17T06:18Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1006; harm check ingest-probe-206; observation time 2026-09-17T06:18Z; suspected fault ingest-race-306; post-change test ingest-drill-406; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1006 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-206@2026-09-17T06:18Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-06"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-06", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-07-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1007; harm check ingest-probe-207; observation time 2026-09-18T11:31Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-307; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-407; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1007 impact was absent under ingest-probe-207 at 2026-09-18T11:31Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1007; harm check ingest-probe-207; observation time 2026-09-18T11:31Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-307; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-407; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1007 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-207@2026-09-18T11:31Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-07"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-07", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-07-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1007; harm check ingest-probe-207; observation time 2026-09-18T11:31Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-307; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-407; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1007 impact was absent under ingest-probe-207 at 2026-09-18T11:31Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1007; harm check ingest-probe-207; observation time 2026-09-18T11:31Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-307; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-407; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1007 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-207@2026-09-18T11:31Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-07"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-07", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-08-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1008; harm check settlement-probe-208; observation time 2026-09-11T16:44Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-308; post-change test settlement-replay-408; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1008 impact was absent under settlement-probe-208 at 2026-09-11T16:44Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1008; harm check settlement-probe-208; observation time 2026-09-11T16:44Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-308; post-change test settlement-replay-408; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1008 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-208@2026-09-11T16:44Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-08"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-08", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-08-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1008; harm check settlement-probe-208; observation time 2026-09-11T16:44Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-308; post-change test settlement-replay-408; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1008 impact was absent under settlement-probe-208 at 2026-09-11T16:44Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1008; harm check settlement-probe-208; observation time 2026-09-11T16:44Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-308; post-change test settlement-replay-408; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1008 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-208@2026-09-11T16:44Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-08"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-08", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-09-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1009; harm check settlement-probe-209; observation time 2026-09-12T21:57Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-309; post-change test settlement-soak-409; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1009 impact was absent under settlement-probe-209 at 2026-09-12T21:57Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1009; harm check settlement-probe-209; observation time 2026-09-12T21:57Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-309; post-change test settlement-soak-409; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1009 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-209@2026-09-12T21:57Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-09"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-09", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-09-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1009; harm check settlement-probe-209; observation time 2026-09-12T21:57Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-309; post-change test settlement-soak-409; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1009 impact was absent under settlement-probe-209 at 2026-09-12T21:57Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1009; harm check settlement-probe-209; observation time 2026-09-12T21:57Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-309; post-change test settlement-soak-409; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1009 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-209@2026-09-12T21:57Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-09"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-09", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-10-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1010; harm check settlement-probe-210; observation time 2026-09-13T02:10Z; suspected fault settlement-backlog-310; post-change test settlement-drill-410; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1010 impact was absent under settlement-probe-210 at 2026-09-13T02:10Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1010; harm check settlement-probe-210; observation time 2026-09-13T02:10Z; suspected fault settlement-backlog-310; post-change test settlement-drill-410; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1010 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-210@2026-09-13T02:10Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-10"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-10", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-10-006", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1010; harm check settlement-probe-210; observation time 2026-09-13T02:10Z; suspected fault settlement-backlog-310; post-change test settlement-drill-410; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1010 impact was absent under settlement-probe-210 at 2026-09-13T02:10Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1010; harm check settlement-probe-210; observation time 2026-09-13T02:10Z; suspected fault settlement-backlog-310; post-change test settlement-drill-410; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1010 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-210@2026-09-13T02:10Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-10"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-10", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-11-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1011; harm check settlement-probe-211; observation time 2026-09-14T07:23Z; suspected fault settlement-stall-311; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-411; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1011 impact was absent under settlement-probe-211 at 2026-09-14T07:23Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1011; harm check settlement-probe-211; observation time 2026-09-14T07:23Z; suspected fault settlement-stall-311; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-411; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1011 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-211@2026-09-14T07:23Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-11"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-11", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-11-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1011; harm check settlement-probe-211; observation time 2026-09-14T07:23Z; suspected fault settlement-stall-311; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-411; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1011 impact was absent under settlement-probe-211 at 2026-09-14T07:23Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1011; harm check settlement-probe-211; observation time 2026-09-14T07:23Z; suspected fault settlement-stall-311; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-411; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1011 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-211@2026-09-14T07:23Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-11"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-11", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-12-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1012; harm check settlement-probe-212; observation time 2026-09-15T12:36Z; suspected fault settlement-race-312; post-change test settlement-replay-412; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1012 impact was absent under settlement-probe-212 at 2026-09-15T12:36Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1012; harm check settlement-probe-212; observation time 2026-09-15T12:36Z; suspected fault settlement-race-312; post-change test settlement-replay-412; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1012 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-212@2026-09-15T12:36Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-12"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-12", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-12-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1012; harm check settlement-probe-212; observation time 2026-09-15T12:36Z; suspected fault settlement-race-312; post-change test settlement-replay-412; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1012 impact was absent under settlement-probe-212 at 2026-09-15T12:36Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1012; harm check settlement-probe-212; observation time 2026-09-15T12:36Z; suspected fault settlement-race-312; post-change test settlement-replay-412; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1012 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-212@2026-09-15T12:36Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-12"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-12", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-13-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1013; harm check settlement-probe-213; observation time 2026-09-16T17:49Z; suspected fault settlement-leak-313; post-change test settlement-soak-413; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1013 impact was absent under settlement-probe-213 at 2026-09-16T17:49Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1013; harm check settlement-probe-213; observation time 2026-09-16T17:49Z; suspected fault settlement-leak-313; post-change test settlement-soak-413; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1013 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-213@2026-09-16T17:49Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-13"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-13", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-13-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1013; harm check settlement-probe-213; observation time 2026-09-16T17:49Z; suspected fault settlement-leak-313; post-change test settlement-soak-413; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1013 impact was absent under settlement-probe-213 at 2026-09-16T17:49Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1013; harm check settlement-probe-213; observation time 2026-09-16T17:49Z; suspected fault settlement-leak-313; post-change test settlement-soak-413; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1013 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-213@2026-09-16T17:49Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-13"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-13", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-14-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1014; harm check settlement-probe-214; observation time 2026-09-17T22:02Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-314; post-change test settlement-drill-414; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1014 impact was absent under settlement-probe-214 at 2026-09-17T22:02Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1014; harm check settlement-probe-214; observation time 2026-09-17T22:02Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-314; post-change test settlement-drill-414; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1014 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-214@2026-09-17T22:02Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-14"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-14", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-14-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1014; harm check settlement-probe-214; observation time 2026-09-17T22:02Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-314; post-change test settlement-drill-414; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1014 impact was absent under settlement-probe-214 at 2026-09-17T22:02Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1014; harm check settlement-probe-214; observation time 2026-09-17T22:02Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-314; post-change test settlement-drill-414; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1014 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-214@2026-09-17T22:02Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-14"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-14", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-15-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1015; harm check settlement-probe-215; observation time 2026-09-18T03:15Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-315; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-415; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1015 impact was absent under settlement-probe-215 at 2026-09-18T03:15Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1015; harm check settlement-probe-215; observation time 2026-09-18T03:15Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-315; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-415; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1015 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-215@2026-09-18T03:15Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "neither of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-15"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-15", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-15-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1015; harm check settlement-probe-215; observation time 2026-09-18T03:15Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-315; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-415; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1015 impact was absent under settlement-probe-215 at 2026-09-18T03:15Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1015; harm check settlement-probe-215; observation time 2026-09-18T03:15Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-315; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-415; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1015 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-215@2026-09-18T03:15Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-15"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-15", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-16-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1016; harm check dispatch-probe-216; observation time 2026-09-11T08:28Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-316; post-change test dispatch-replay-416; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1016 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-216 at 2026-09-11T08:28Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1016; harm check dispatch-probe-216; observation time 2026-09-11T08:28Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-316; post-change test dispatch-replay-416; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1016 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-216@2026-09-11T08:28Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-16"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-16", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-16-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1016; harm check dispatch-probe-216; observation time 2026-09-11T08:28Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-316; post-change test dispatch-replay-416; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1016 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-216 at 2026-09-11T08:28Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1016; harm check dispatch-probe-216; observation time 2026-09-11T08:28Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-316; post-change test dispatch-replay-416; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1016 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-216@2026-09-11T08:28Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-16"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-16", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-17-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1017; harm check dispatch-probe-217; observation time 2026-09-12T13:41Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-317; post-change test dispatch-soak-417; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1017 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-217 at 2026-09-12T13:41Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1017; harm check dispatch-probe-217; observation time 2026-09-12T13:41Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-317; post-change test dispatch-soak-417; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1017 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-217@2026-09-12T13:41Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-17"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-17", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-17-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1017; harm check dispatch-probe-217; observation time 2026-09-12T13:41Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-317; post-change test dispatch-soak-417; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1017 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-217 at 2026-09-12T13:41Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1017; harm check dispatch-probe-217; observation time 2026-09-12T13:41Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-317; post-change test dispatch-soak-417; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1017 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-217@2026-09-12T13:41Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-17"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-17", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-18-004", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1018; harm check dispatch-probe-218; observation time 2026-09-13T18:54Z; suspected fault dispatch-race-318; post-change test dispatch-drill-418; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1018 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-218 at 2026-09-13T18:54Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1018; harm check dispatch-probe-218; observation time 2026-09-13T18:54Z; suspected fault dispatch-race-318; post-change test dispatch-drill-418; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1018 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-218@2026-09-13T18:54Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "neither of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-18"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-18", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-18-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1018; harm check dispatch-probe-218; observation time 2026-09-13T18:54Z; suspected fault dispatch-race-318; post-change test dispatch-drill-418; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1018 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-218 at 2026-09-13T18:54Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1018; harm check dispatch-probe-218; observation time 2026-09-13T18:54Z; suspected fault dispatch-race-318; post-change test dispatch-drill-418; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1018 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-218@2026-09-13T18:54Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-18"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-18", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-19-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1019; harm check dispatch-probe-219; observation time 2026-09-14T23:07Z; suspected fault dispatch-leak-319; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-419; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1019 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-219 at 2026-09-14T23:07Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1019; harm check dispatch-probe-219; observation time 2026-09-14T23:07Z; suspected fault dispatch-leak-319; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-419; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1019 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-219@2026-09-14T23:07Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-19"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-19", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-19-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1019; harm check dispatch-probe-219; observation time 2026-09-14T23:07Z; suspected fault dispatch-leak-319; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-419; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1019 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-219 at 2026-09-14T23:07Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1019; harm check dispatch-probe-219; observation time 2026-09-14T23:07Z; suspected fault dispatch-leak-319; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-419; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1019 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-219@2026-09-14T23:07Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-19"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-19", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-20-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1020; harm check dispatch-probe-220; observation time 2026-09-15T04:20Z; suspected fault dispatch-lock-320; post-change test dispatch-replay-420; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1020 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-220 at 2026-09-15T04:20Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1020; harm check dispatch-probe-220; observation time 2026-09-15T04:20Z; suspected fault dispatch-lock-320; post-change test dispatch-replay-420; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1020 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-220@2026-09-15T04:20Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "neither of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-20"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-20", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-20-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1020; harm check dispatch-probe-220; observation time 2026-09-15T04:20Z; suspected fault dispatch-lock-320; post-change test dispatch-replay-420; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1020 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-220 at 2026-09-15T04:20Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1020; harm check dispatch-probe-220; observation time 2026-09-15T04:20Z; suspected fault dispatch-lock-320; post-change test dispatch-replay-420; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1020 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-220@2026-09-15T04:20Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-20"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-20", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-21-007", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1021; harm check dispatch-probe-221; observation time 2026-09-16T09:33Z; suspected fault dispatch-quota-321; post-change test dispatch-soak-421; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1021 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-221 at 2026-09-16T09:33Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1021; harm check dispatch-probe-221; observation time 2026-09-16T09:33Z; suspected fault dispatch-quota-321; post-change test dispatch-soak-421; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1021 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-221@2026-09-16T09:33Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-21"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-21", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-21-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1021; harm check dispatch-probe-221; observation time 2026-09-16T09:33Z; suspected fault dispatch-quota-321; post-change test dispatch-soak-421; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1021 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-221 at 2026-09-16T09:33Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1021; harm check dispatch-probe-221; observation time 2026-09-16T09:33Z; suspected fault dispatch-quota-321; post-change test dispatch-soak-421; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1021 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-221@2026-09-16T09:33Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-21"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-21", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-22-003", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1022; harm check dispatch-probe-222; observation time 2026-09-17T14:46Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-322; post-change test dispatch-drill-422; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1022 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-222 at 2026-09-17T14:46Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1022; harm check dispatch-probe-222; observation time 2026-09-17T14:46Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-322; post-change test dispatch-drill-422; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1022 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-222@2026-09-17T14:46Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-22"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-22", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-22-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1022; harm check dispatch-probe-222; observation time 2026-09-17T14:46Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-322; post-change test dispatch-drill-422; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1022 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-222 at 2026-09-17T14:46Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1022; harm check dispatch-probe-222; observation time 2026-09-17T14:46Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-322; post-change test dispatch-drill-422; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1022 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-222@2026-09-17T14:46Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-22"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-22", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-23-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1023; harm check dispatch-probe-223; observation time 2026-09-18T19:59Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-323; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-423; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1023 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-223 at 2026-09-18T19:59Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1023; harm check dispatch-probe-223; observation time 2026-09-18T19:59Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-323; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-423; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1023 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-223@2026-09-18T19:59Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-23"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-23", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-23-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1023; harm check dispatch-probe-223; observation time 2026-09-18T19:59Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-323; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-423; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1023 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-223 at 2026-09-18T19:59Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1023; harm check dispatch-probe-223; observation time 2026-09-18T19:59Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-323; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-423; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1023 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-223@2026-09-18T19:59Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-23"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-23", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-24-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1024; harm check storage-probe-224; observation time 2026-09-11T00:12Z; suspected fault storage-race-324; post-change test storage-replay-424; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1024 impact was absent under storage-probe-224 at 2026-09-11T00:12Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1024; harm check storage-probe-224; observation time 2026-09-11T00:12Z; suspected fault storage-race-324; post-change test storage-replay-424; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1024 impact-recovered(storage-probe-224@2026-09-11T00:12Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-24"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-24", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-24-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1024; harm check storage-probe-224; observation time 2026-09-11T00:12Z; suspected fault storage-race-324; post-change test storage-replay-424; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1024 impact was absent under storage-probe-224 at 2026-09-11T00:12Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1024; harm check storage-probe-224; observation time 2026-09-11T00:12Z; suspected fault storage-race-324; post-change test storage-replay-424; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1024 impact-recovered(storage-probe-224@2026-09-11T00:12Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-24"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-24", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-25-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1025; harm check storage-probe-225; observation time 2026-09-12T05:25Z; suspected fault storage-leak-325; post-change test storage-soak-425; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1025 impact was absent under storage-probe-225 at 2026-09-12T05:25Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1025; harm check storage-probe-225; observation time 2026-09-12T05:25Z; suspected fault storage-leak-325; post-change test storage-soak-425; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1025 impact-recovered(storage-probe-225@2026-09-12T05:25Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-25"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-25", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-25-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1025; harm check storage-probe-225; observation time 2026-09-12T05:25Z; suspected fault storage-leak-325; post-change test storage-soak-425; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1025 impact was absent under storage-probe-225 at 2026-09-12T05:25Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1025; harm check storage-probe-225; observation time 2026-09-12T05:25Z; suspected fault storage-leak-325; post-change test storage-soak-425; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1025 impact-recovered(storage-probe-225@2026-09-12T05:25Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-25"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-25", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-26-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1026; harm check storage-probe-226; observation time 2026-09-13T10:38Z; suspected fault storage-lock-326; post-change test storage-drill-426; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1026 impact was absent under storage-probe-226 at 2026-09-13T10:38Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1026; harm check storage-probe-226; observation time 2026-09-13T10:38Z; suspected fault storage-lock-326; post-change test storage-drill-426; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1026 impact-recovered(storage-probe-226@2026-09-13T10:38Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-26"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-26", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-26-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1026; harm check storage-probe-226; observation time 2026-09-13T10:38Z; suspected fault storage-lock-326; post-change test storage-drill-426; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1026 impact was absent under storage-probe-226 at 2026-09-13T10:38Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1026; harm check storage-probe-226; observation time 2026-09-13T10:38Z; suspected fault storage-lock-326; post-change test storage-drill-426; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1026 impact-recovered(storage-probe-226@2026-09-13T10:38Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-26"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-26", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-27-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1027; harm check storage-probe-227; observation time 2026-09-14T15:51Z; suspected fault storage-quota-327; post-change test storage-fault-injection-427; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1027 impact was absent under storage-probe-227 at 2026-09-14T15:51Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1027; harm check storage-probe-227; observation time 2026-09-14T15:51Z; suspected fault storage-quota-327; post-change test storage-fault-injection-427; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1027 impact-recovered(storage-probe-227@2026-09-14T15:51Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-27"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-27", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-27-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1027; harm check storage-probe-227; observation time 2026-09-14T15:51Z; suspected fault storage-quota-327; post-change test storage-fault-injection-427; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1027 impact was absent under storage-probe-227 at 2026-09-14T15:51Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1027; harm check storage-probe-227; observation time 2026-09-14T15:51Z; suspected fault storage-quota-327; post-change test storage-fault-injection-427; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1027 impact-recovered(storage-probe-227@2026-09-14T15:51Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-27"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-27", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-28-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1028; harm check storage-probe-228; observation time 2026-09-15T20:04Z; suspected fault storage-backlog-328; post-change test storage-replay-428; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1028 impact was absent under storage-probe-228 at 2026-09-15T20:04Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1028; harm check storage-probe-228; observation time 2026-09-15T20:04Z; suspected fault storage-backlog-328; post-change test storage-replay-428; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1028 impact-recovered(storage-probe-228@2026-09-15T20:04Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-28"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-28", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-28-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1028; harm check storage-probe-228; observation time 2026-09-15T20:04Z; suspected fault storage-backlog-328; post-change test storage-replay-428; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1028 impact was absent under storage-probe-228 at 2026-09-15T20:04Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1028; harm check storage-probe-228; observation time 2026-09-15T20:04Z; suspected fault storage-backlog-328; post-change test storage-replay-428; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1028 impact-recovered(storage-probe-228@2026-09-15T20:04Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-28"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-28", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-29-003", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1029; harm check storage-probe-229; observation time 2026-09-16T01:17Z; suspected fault storage-stall-329; post-change test storage-soak-429; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1029 impact was absent under storage-probe-229 at 2026-09-16T01:17Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1029; harm check storage-probe-229; observation time 2026-09-16T01:17Z; suspected fault storage-stall-329; post-change test storage-soak-429; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1029 impact-recovered(storage-probe-229@2026-09-16T01:17Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-29"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-29", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-29-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1029; harm check storage-probe-229; observation time 2026-09-16T01:17Z; suspected fault storage-stall-329; post-change test storage-soak-429; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1029 impact was absent under storage-probe-229 at 2026-09-16T01:17Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1029; harm check storage-probe-229; observation time 2026-09-16T01:17Z; suspected fault storage-stall-329; post-change test storage-soak-429; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1029 impact-recovered(storage-probe-229@2026-09-16T01:17Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-29"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-29", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-30-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1030; harm check storage-probe-230; observation time 2026-09-17T06:30Z; suspected fault storage-race-330; post-change test storage-drill-430; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1030 impact was absent under storage-probe-230 at 2026-09-17T06:30Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1030; harm check storage-probe-230; observation time 2026-09-17T06:30Z; suspected fault storage-race-330; post-change test storage-drill-430; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1030 impact-recovered(storage-probe-230@2026-09-17T06:30Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-30"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-30", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-30-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1030; harm check storage-probe-230; observation time 2026-09-17T06:30Z; suspected fault storage-race-330; post-change test storage-drill-430; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1030 impact was absent under storage-probe-230 at 2026-09-17T06:30Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1030; harm check storage-probe-230; observation time 2026-09-17T06:30Z; suspected fault storage-race-330; post-change test storage-drill-430; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1030 impact-recovered(storage-probe-230@2026-09-17T06:30Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-30"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-30", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-31-005", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1031; harm check storage-probe-231; observation time 2026-09-18T11:43Z; suspected fault storage-leak-331; post-change test storage-fault-injection-431; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1031 impact was absent under storage-probe-231 at 2026-09-18T11:43Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1031; harm check storage-probe-231; observation time 2026-09-18T11:43Z; suspected fault storage-leak-331; post-change test storage-fault-injection-431; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1031 impact-recovered(storage-probe-231@2026-09-18T11:43Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-31"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-31", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-31-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1031; harm check storage-probe-231; observation time 2026-09-18T11:43Z; suspected fault storage-leak-331; post-change test storage-fault-injection-431; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1031 impact was absent under storage-probe-231 at 2026-09-18T11:43Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1031; harm check storage-probe-231; observation time 2026-09-18T11:43Z; suspected fault storage-leak-331; post-change test storage-fault-injection-431; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1031 impact-recovered(storage-probe-231@2026-09-18T11:43Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-31"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-31", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-32-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1032; harm check provisioning-probe-232; observation time 2026-09-11T16:56Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-332; post-change test provisioning-replay-432; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1032 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-232 at 2026-09-11T16:56Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1032; harm check provisioning-probe-232; observation time 2026-09-11T16:56Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-332; post-change test provisioning-replay-432; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1032 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-232@2026-09-11T16:56Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "neither of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-32"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-32", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-32-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1032; harm check provisioning-probe-232; observation time 2026-09-11T16:56Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-332; post-change test provisioning-replay-432; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1032 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-232 at 2026-09-11T16:56Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1032; harm check provisioning-probe-232; observation time 2026-09-11T16:56Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-332; post-change test provisioning-replay-432; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1032 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-232@2026-09-11T16:56Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-32"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-32", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-33-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1033; harm check provisioning-probe-233; observation time 2026-09-12T21:09Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-333; post-change test provisioning-soak-433; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1033 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-233 at 2026-09-12T21:09Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1033; harm check provisioning-probe-233; observation time 2026-09-12T21:09Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-333; post-change test provisioning-soak-433; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1033 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-233@2026-09-12T21:09Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-33"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-33", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-33-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1033; harm check provisioning-probe-233; observation time 2026-09-12T21:09Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-333; post-change test provisioning-soak-433; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1033 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-233 at 2026-09-12T21:09Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1033; harm check provisioning-probe-233; observation time 2026-09-12T21:09Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-333; post-change test provisioning-soak-433; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1033 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-233@2026-09-12T21:09Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-33"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-33", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-34-003", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1034; harm check provisioning-probe-234; observation time 2026-09-13T02:22Z; suspected fault provisioning-backlog-334; post-change test provisioning-drill-434; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1034 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-234 at 2026-09-13T02:22Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1034; harm check provisioning-probe-234; observation time 2026-09-13T02:22Z; suspected fault provisioning-backlog-334; post-change test provisioning-drill-434; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1034 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-234@2026-09-13T02:22Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-34"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-34", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-34-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1034; harm check provisioning-probe-234; observation time 2026-09-13T02:22Z; suspected fault provisioning-backlog-334; post-change test provisioning-drill-434; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1034 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-234 at 2026-09-13T02:22Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1034; harm check provisioning-probe-234; observation time 2026-09-13T02:22Z; suspected fault provisioning-backlog-334; post-change test provisioning-drill-434; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1034 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-234@2026-09-13T02:22Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-34"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-34", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-35-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1035; harm check provisioning-probe-235; observation time 2026-09-14T07:35Z; suspected fault provisioning-stall-335; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-435; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1035 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-235 at 2026-09-14T07:35Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1035; harm check provisioning-probe-235; observation time 2026-09-14T07:35Z; suspected fault provisioning-stall-335; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-435; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1035 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-235@2026-09-14T07:35Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-35"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-35", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-35-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1035; harm check provisioning-probe-235; observation time 2026-09-14T07:35Z; suspected fault provisioning-stall-335; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-435; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1035 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-235 at 2026-09-14T07:35Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1035; harm check provisioning-probe-235; observation time 2026-09-14T07:35Z; suspected fault provisioning-stall-335; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-435; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1035 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-235@2026-09-14T07:35Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-35"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-35", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-36-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1036; harm check provisioning-probe-236; observation time 2026-09-15T12:48Z; suspected fault provisioning-race-336; post-change test provisioning-replay-436; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1036 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-236 at 2026-09-15T12:48Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1036; harm check provisioning-probe-236; observation time 2026-09-15T12:48Z; suspected fault provisioning-race-336; post-change test provisioning-replay-436; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1036 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-236@2026-09-15T12:48Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-36"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-36", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-36-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1036; harm check provisioning-probe-236; observation time 2026-09-15T12:48Z; suspected fault provisioning-race-336; post-change test provisioning-replay-436; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1036 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-236 at 2026-09-15T12:48Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1036; harm check provisioning-probe-236; observation time 2026-09-15T12:48Z; suspected fault provisioning-race-336; post-change test provisioning-replay-436; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1036 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-236@2026-09-15T12:48Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-36"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-36", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-37-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1037; harm check provisioning-probe-237; observation time 2026-09-16T17:01Z; suspected fault provisioning-leak-337; post-change test provisioning-soak-437; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1037 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-237 at 2026-09-16T17:01Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1037; harm check provisioning-probe-237; observation time 2026-09-16T17:01Z; suspected fault provisioning-leak-337; post-change test provisioning-soak-437; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1037 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-237@2026-09-16T17:01Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-37"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-37", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-37-003", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1037; harm check provisioning-probe-237; observation time 2026-09-16T17:01Z; suspected fault provisioning-leak-337; post-change test provisioning-soak-437; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1037 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-237 at 2026-09-16T17:01Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1037; harm check provisioning-probe-237; observation time 2026-09-16T17:01Z; suspected fault provisioning-leak-337; post-change test provisioning-soak-437; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1037 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-237@2026-09-16T17:01Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-37"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-37", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-38-005", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1038; harm check provisioning-probe-238; observation time 2026-09-17T22:14Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-338; post-change test provisioning-drill-438; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1038 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-238 at 2026-09-17T22:14Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1038; harm check provisioning-probe-238; observation time 2026-09-17T22:14Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-338; post-change test provisioning-drill-438; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1038 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-238@2026-09-17T22:14Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-38"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-38", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-38-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1038; harm check provisioning-probe-238; observation time 2026-09-17T22:14Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-338; post-change test provisioning-drill-438; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1038 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-238 at 2026-09-17T22:14Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1038; harm check provisioning-probe-238; observation time 2026-09-17T22:14Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-338; post-change test provisioning-drill-438; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1038 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-238@2026-09-17T22:14Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-38"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-38", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-39-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1039; harm check provisioning-probe-239; observation time 2026-09-18T03:27Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-339; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-439; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1039 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-239 at 2026-09-18T03:27Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1039; harm check provisioning-probe-239; observation time 2026-09-18T03:27Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-339; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-439; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1039 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-239@2026-09-18T03:27Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-39"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-39", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-39-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1039; harm check provisioning-probe-239; observation time 2026-09-18T03:27Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-339; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-439; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1039 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-239 at 2026-09-18T03:27Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1039; harm check provisioning-probe-239; observation time 2026-09-18T03:27Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-339; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-439; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1039 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-239@2026-09-18T03:27Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-39"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-39", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-40-003", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1040; harm check notifications-probe-240; observation time 2026-09-11T08:40Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-340; post-change test notifications-replay-440; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1040 impact was absent under notifications-probe-240 at 2026-09-11T08:40Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1040; harm check notifications-probe-240; observation time 2026-09-11T08:40Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-340; post-change test notifications-replay-440; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1040 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-240@2026-09-11T08:40Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-40"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-40", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-40-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1040; harm check notifications-probe-240; observation time 2026-09-11T08:40Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-340; post-change test notifications-replay-440; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1040 impact was absent under notifications-probe-240 at 2026-09-11T08:40Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1040; harm check notifications-probe-240; observation time 2026-09-11T08:40Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-340; post-change test notifications-replay-440; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1040 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-240@2026-09-11T08:40Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-40"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-40", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-41-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1041; harm check notifications-probe-241; observation time 2026-09-12T13:53Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-341; post-change test notifications-soak-441; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1041 impact was absent under notifications-probe-241 at 2026-09-12T13:53Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1041; harm check notifications-probe-241; observation time 2026-09-12T13:53Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-341; post-change test notifications-soak-441; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1041 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-241@2026-09-12T13:53Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-41"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-41", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-41-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1041; harm check notifications-probe-241; observation time 2026-09-12T13:53Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-341; post-change test notifications-soak-441; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1041 impact was absent under notifications-probe-241 at 2026-09-12T13:53Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1041; harm check notifications-probe-241; observation time 2026-09-12T13:53Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-341; post-change test notifications-soak-441; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1041 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-241@2026-09-12T13:53Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-41"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-41", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-42-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1042; harm check notifications-probe-242; observation time 2026-09-13T18:06Z; suspected fault notifications-race-342; post-change test notifications-drill-442; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1042 impact was absent under notifications-probe-242 at 2026-09-13T18:06Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1042; harm check notifications-probe-242; observation time 2026-09-13T18:06Z; suspected fault notifications-race-342; post-change test notifications-drill-442; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1042 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-242@2026-09-13T18:06Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-42"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-42", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-42-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1042; harm check notifications-probe-242; observation time 2026-09-13T18:06Z; suspected fault notifications-race-342; post-change test notifications-drill-442; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1042 impact was absent under notifications-probe-242 at 2026-09-13T18:06Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1042; harm check notifications-probe-242; observation time 2026-09-13T18:06Z; suspected fault notifications-race-342; post-change test notifications-drill-442; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1042 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-242@2026-09-13T18:06Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-42"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-42", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-43-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1043; harm check notifications-probe-243; observation time 2026-09-14T23:19Z; suspected fault notifications-leak-343; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-443; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1043 impact was absent under notifications-probe-243 at 2026-09-14T23:19Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1043; harm check notifications-probe-243; observation time 2026-09-14T23:19Z; suspected fault notifications-leak-343; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-443; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1043 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-243@2026-09-14T23:19Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-43"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-43", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-43-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1043; harm check notifications-probe-243; observation time 2026-09-14T23:19Z; suspected fault notifications-leak-343; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-443; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1043 impact was absent under notifications-probe-243 at 2026-09-14T23:19Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1043; harm check notifications-probe-243; observation time 2026-09-14T23:19Z; suspected fault notifications-leak-343; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-443; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1043 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-243@2026-09-14T23:19Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-43"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-43", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-44-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1044; harm check notifications-probe-244; observation time 2026-09-15T04:32Z; suspected fault notifications-lock-344; post-change test notifications-replay-444; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1044 impact was absent under notifications-probe-244 at 2026-09-15T04:32Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1044; harm check notifications-probe-244; observation time 2026-09-15T04:32Z; suspected fault notifications-lock-344; post-change test notifications-replay-444; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1044 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-244@2026-09-15T04:32Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-44"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-44", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-44-003", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1044; harm check notifications-probe-244; observation time 2026-09-15T04:32Z; suspected fault notifications-lock-344; post-change test notifications-replay-444; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1044 impact was absent under notifications-probe-244 at 2026-09-15T04:32Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1044; harm check notifications-probe-244; observation time 2026-09-15T04:32Z; suspected fault notifications-lock-344; post-change test notifications-replay-444; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1044 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-244@2026-09-15T04:32Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-44"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-44", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-45-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1045; harm check notifications-probe-245; observation time 2026-09-16T09:45Z; suspected fault notifications-quota-345; post-change test notifications-soak-445; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1045 impact was absent under notifications-probe-245 at 2026-09-16T09:45Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1045; harm check notifications-probe-245; observation time 2026-09-16T09:45Z; suspected fault notifications-quota-345; post-change test notifications-soak-445; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1045 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-245@2026-09-16T09:45Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-45"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-45", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-45-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1045; harm check notifications-probe-245; observation time 2026-09-16T09:45Z; suspected fault notifications-quota-345; post-change test notifications-soak-445; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1045 impact was absent under notifications-probe-245 at 2026-09-16T09:45Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1045; harm check notifications-probe-245; observation time 2026-09-16T09:45Z; suspected fault notifications-quota-345; post-change test notifications-soak-445; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1045 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-245@2026-09-16T09:45Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-45"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-45", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-46-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1046; harm check notifications-probe-246; observation time 2026-09-17T14:58Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-346; post-change test notifications-drill-446; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1046 impact was absent under notifications-probe-246 at 2026-09-17T14:58Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1046; harm check notifications-probe-246; observation time 2026-09-17T14:58Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-346; post-change test notifications-drill-446; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1046 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-246@2026-09-17T14:58Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-46"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-46", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-46-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1046; harm check notifications-probe-246; observation time 2026-09-17T14:58Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-346; post-change test notifications-drill-446; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1046 impact was absent under notifications-probe-246 at 2026-09-17T14:58Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1046; harm check notifications-probe-246; observation time 2026-09-17T14:58Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-346; post-change test notifications-drill-446; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1046 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-246@2026-09-17T14:58Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-46"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-46", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-ass-47-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1047; harm check notifications-probe-247; observation time 2026-09-18T19:11Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-347; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-447; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1047 impact was absent under notifications-probe-247 at 2026-09-18T19:11Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1047; harm check notifications-probe-247; observation time 2026-09-18T19:11Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-347; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-447; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1047 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-247@2026-09-18T19:11Z).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-47"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-47", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-impact-only-rou-47-003", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1047; harm check notifications-probe-247; observation time 2026-09-18T19:11Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-347; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-447; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1047 impact was absent under notifications-probe-247 at 2026-09-18T19:11Z.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1047; harm check notifications-probe-247; observation time 2026-09-18T19:11Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-347; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-447; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1047 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-247@2026-09-18T19:11Z).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the recovery workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "impact-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "impact-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-47"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-impact-only-47", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "impact-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-00-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1048; harm check ingest-probe-248; observation time 2026-09-11T00:24Z; suspected fault ingest-race-348; post-change test ingest-replay-448; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The ingest-race-348 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-replay-448 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1048; harm check ingest-probe-248; observation time 2026-09-11T00:24Z; suspected fault ingest-race-348; post-change test ingest-replay-448; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1048 cause-resolved(ingest-race-348, checked-by=ingest-replay-448).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-00"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-00", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-00-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1048; harm check ingest-probe-248; observation time 2026-09-11T00:24Z; suspected fault ingest-race-348; post-change test ingest-replay-448; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The ingest-race-348 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-replay-448 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1048; harm check ingest-probe-248; observation time 2026-09-11T00:24Z; suspected fault ingest-race-348; post-change test ingest-replay-448; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1048 cause-resolved(ingest-race-348, checked-by=ingest-replay-448).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-00"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-00", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-01-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1049; harm check ingest-probe-249; observation time 2026-09-12T05:37Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-349; post-change test ingest-soak-449; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The ingest-leak-349 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-soak-449 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1049; harm check ingest-probe-249; observation time 2026-09-12T05:37Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-349; post-change test ingest-soak-449; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1049 cause-resolved(ingest-leak-349, checked-by=ingest-soak-449).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-01"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-01", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-01-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1049; harm check ingest-probe-249; observation time 2026-09-12T05:37Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-349; post-change test ingest-soak-449; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The ingest-leak-349 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-soak-449 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1049; harm check ingest-probe-249; observation time 2026-09-12T05:37Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-349; post-change test ingest-soak-449; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1049 cause-resolved(ingest-leak-349, checked-by=ingest-soak-449).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-01"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-01", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-02-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1050; harm check ingest-probe-250; observation time 2026-09-13T10:50Z; suspected fault ingest-lock-350; post-change test ingest-drill-450; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The ingest-lock-350 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-drill-450 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1050; harm check ingest-probe-250; observation time 2026-09-13T10:50Z; suspected fault ingest-lock-350; post-change test ingest-drill-450; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1050 cause-resolved(ingest-lock-350, checked-by=ingest-drill-450).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-02"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-02", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-02-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1050; harm check ingest-probe-250; observation time 2026-09-13T10:50Z; suspected fault ingest-lock-350; post-change test ingest-drill-450; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The ingest-lock-350 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-drill-450 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1050; harm check ingest-probe-250; observation time 2026-09-13T10:50Z; suspected fault ingest-lock-350; post-change test ingest-drill-450; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1050 cause-resolved(ingest-lock-350, checked-by=ingest-drill-450).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-02"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-02", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-03-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1051; harm check ingest-probe-251; observation time 2026-09-14T15:03Z; suspected fault ingest-quota-351; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-451; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The ingest-quota-351 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-fault-injection-451 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1051; harm check ingest-probe-251; observation time 2026-09-14T15:03Z; suspected fault ingest-quota-351; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-451; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1051 cause-resolved(ingest-quota-351, checked-by=ingest-fault-injection-451).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-03"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-03", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-03-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1051; harm check ingest-probe-251; observation time 2026-09-14T15:03Z; suspected fault ingest-quota-351; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-451; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The ingest-quota-351 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-fault-injection-451 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1051; harm check ingest-probe-251; observation time 2026-09-14T15:03Z; suspected fault ingest-quota-351; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-451; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1051 cause-resolved(ingest-quota-351, checked-by=ingest-fault-injection-451).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-03"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-03", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-04-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1052; harm check ingest-probe-252; observation time 2026-09-15T20:16Z; suspected fault ingest-backlog-352; post-change test ingest-replay-452; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The ingest-backlog-352 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-replay-452 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1052; harm check ingest-probe-252; observation time 2026-09-15T20:16Z; suspected fault ingest-backlog-352; post-change test ingest-replay-452; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1052 cause-resolved(ingest-backlog-352, checked-by=ingest-replay-452).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-04"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-04", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-04-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1052; harm check ingest-probe-252; observation time 2026-09-15T20:16Z; suspected fault ingest-backlog-352; post-change test ingest-replay-452; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The ingest-backlog-352 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-replay-452 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1052; harm check ingest-probe-252; observation time 2026-09-15T20:16Z; suspected fault ingest-backlog-352; post-change test ingest-replay-452; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1052 cause-resolved(ingest-backlog-352, checked-by=ingest-replay-452).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-04"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-04", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-05-004", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1053; harm check ingest-probe-253; observation time 2026-09-16T01:29Z; suspected fault ingest-stall-353; post-change test ingest-soak-453; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The ingest-stall-353 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-soak-453 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1053; harm check ingest-probe-253; observation time 2026-09-16T01:29Z; suspected fault ingest-stall-353; post-change test ingest-soak-453; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1053 cause-resolved(ingest-stall-353, checked-by=ingest-soak-453).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-05"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-05", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-05-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1053; harm check ingest-probe-253; observation time 2026-09-16T01:29Z; suspected fault ingest-stall-353; post-change test ingest-soak-453; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The ingest-stall-353 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-soak-453 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1053; harm check ingest-probe-253; observation time 2026-09-16T01:29Z; suspected fault ingest-stall-353; post-change test ingest-soak-453; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1053 cause-resolved(ingest-stall-353, checked-by=ingest-soak-453).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-05"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-05", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-06-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1054; harm check ingest-probe-254; observation time 2026-09-17T06:42Z; suspected fault ingest-race-354; post-change test ingest-drill-454; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The ingest-race-354 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-drill-454 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1054; harm check ingest-probe-254; observation time 2026-09-17T06:42Z; suspected fault ingest-race-354; post-change test ingest-drill-454; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1054 cause-resolved(ingest-race-354, checked-by=ingest-drill-454).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-06"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-06", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-06-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1054; harm check ingest-probe-254; observation time 2026-09-17T06:42Z; suspected fault ingest-race-354; post-change test ingest-drill-454; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The ingest-race-354 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-drill-454 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1054; harm check ingest-probe-254; observation time 2026-09-17T06:42Z; suspected fault ingest-race-354; post-change test ingest-drill-454; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1054 cause-resolved(ingest-race-354, checked-by=ingest-drill-454).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-06"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-06", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-07-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1055; harm check ingest-probe-255; observation time 2026-09-18T11:55Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-355; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-455; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The ingest-leak-355 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-fault-injection-455 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1055; harm check ingest-probe-255; observation time 2026-09-18T11:55Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-355; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-455; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1055 cause-resolved(ingest-leak-355, checked-by=ingest-fault-injection-455).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-07"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-07", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-07-004", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1055; harm check ingest-probe-255; observation time 2026-09-18T11:55Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-355; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-455; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The ingest-leak-355 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-fault-injection-455 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1055; harm check ingest-probe-255; observation time 2026-09-18T11:55Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-355; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-455; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1055 cause-resolved(ingest-leak-355, checked-by=ingest-fault-injection-455).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-07"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-07", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-08-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1056; harm check settlement-probe-256; observation time 2026-09-11T16:08Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-356; post-change test settlement-replay-456; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The settlement-lock-356 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-replay-456 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1056; harm check settlement-probe-256; observation time 2026-09-11T16:08Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-356; post-change test settlement-replay-456; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1056 cause-resolved(settlement-lock-356, checked-by=settlement-replay-456).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-08"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-08", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-08-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1056; harm check settlement-probe-256; observation time 2026-09-11T16:08Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-356; post-change test settlement-replay-456; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The settlement-lock-356 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-replay-456 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1056; harm check settlement-probe-256; observation time 2026-09-11T16:08Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-356; post-change test settlement-replay-456; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1056 cause-resolved(settlement-lock-356, checked-by=settlement-replay-456).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-08"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-08", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-09-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1057; harm check settlement-probe-257; observation time 2026-09-12T21:21Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-357; post-change test settlement-soak-457; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The settlement-quota-357 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-soak-457 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1057; harm check settlement-probe-257; observation time 2026-09-12T21:21Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-357; post-change test settlement-soak-457; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1057 cause-resolved(settlement-quota-357, checked-by=settlement-soak-457).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-09"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-09", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-09-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1057; harm check settlement-probe-257; observation time 2026-09-12T21:21Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-357; post-change test settlement-soak-457; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The settlement-quota-357 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-soak-457 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1057; harm check settlement-probe-257; observation time 2026-09-12T21:21Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-357; post-change test settlement-soak-457; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1057 cause-resolved(settlement-quota-357, checked-by=settlement-soak-457).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-09"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-09", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-10-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1058; harm check settlement-probe-258; observation time 2026-09-13T02:34Z; suspected fault settlement-backlog-358; post-change test settlement-drill-458; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The settlement-backlog-358 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-drill-458 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1058; harm check settlement-probe-258; observation time 2026-09-13T02:34Z; suspected fault settlement-backlog-358; post-change test settlement-drill-458; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1058 cause-resolved(settlement-backlog-358, checked-by=settlement-drill-458).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-10"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-10", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-10-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1058; harm check settlement-probe-258; observation time 2026-09-13T02:34Z; suspected fault settlement-backlog-358; post-change test settlement-drill-458; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The settlement-backlog-358 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-drill-458 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1058; harm check settlement-probe-258; observation time 2026-09-13T02:34Z; suspected fault settlement-backlog-358; post-change test settlement-drill-458; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1058 cause-resolved(settlement-backlog-358, checked-by=settlement-drill-458).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-10"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-10", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-11-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1059; harm check settlement-probe-259; observation time 2026-09-14T07:47Z; suspected fault settlement-stall-359; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-459; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The settlement-stall-359 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-fault-injection-459 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1059; harm check settlement-probe-259; observation time 2026-09-14T07:47Z; suspected fault settlement-stall-359; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-459; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1059 cause-resolved(settlement-stall-359, checked-by=settlement-fault-injection-459).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-11"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-11", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-11-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1059; harm check settlement-probe-259; observation time 2026-09-14T07:47Z; suspected fault settlement-stall-359; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-459; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The settlement-stall-359 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-fault-injection-459 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1059; harm check settlement-probe-259; observation time 2026-09-14T07:47Z; suspected fault settlement-stall-359; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-459; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1059 cause-resolved(settlement-stall-359, checked-by=settlement-fault-injection-459).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-11"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-11", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-12-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1060; harm check settlement-probe-260; observation time 2026-09-15T12:00Z; suspected fault settlement-race-360; post-change test settlement-replay-460; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The settlement-race-360 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-replay-460 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1060; harm check settlement-probe-260; observation time 2026-09-15T12:00Z; suspected fault settlement-race-360; post-change test settlement-replay-460; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1060 cause-resolved(settlement-race-360, checked-by=settlement-replay-460).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-12"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-12", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-12-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1060; harm check settlement-probe-260; observation time 2026-09-15T12:00Z; suspected fault settlement-race-360; post-change test settlement-replay-460; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The settlement-race-360 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-replay-460 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1060; harm check settlement-probe-260; observation time 2026-09-15T12:00Z; suspected fault settlement-race-360; post-change test settlement-replay-460; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1060 cause-resolved(settlement-race-360, checked-by=settlement-replay-460).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-12"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-12", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-13-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1061; harm check settlement-probe-261; observation time 2026-09-16T17:13Z; suspected fault settlement-leak-361; post-change test settlement-soak-461; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The settlement-leak-361 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-soak-461 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1061; harm check settlement-probe-261; observation time 2026-09-16T17:13Z; suspected fault settlement-leak-361; post-change test settlement-soak-461; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1061 cause-resolved(settlement-leak-361, checked-by=settlement-soak-461).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-13"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-13", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-13-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1061; harm check settlement-probe-261; observation time 2026-09-16T17:13Z; suspected fault settlement-leak-361; post-change test settlement-soak-461; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The settlement-leak-361 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-soak-461 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1061; harm check settlement-probe-261; observation time 2026-09-16T17:13Z; suspected fault settlement-leak-361; post-change test settlement-soak-461; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1061 cause-resolved(settlement-leak-361, checked-by=settlement-soak-461).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-13"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-13", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-14-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1062; harm check settlement-probe-262; observation time 2026-09-17T22:26Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-362; post-change test settlement-drill-462; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The settlement-lock-362 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-drill-462 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1062; harm check settlement-probe-262; observation time 2026-09-17T22:26Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-362; post-change test settlement-drill-462; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1062 cause-resolved(settlement-lock-362, checked-by=settlement-drill-462).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-14"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-14", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-14-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1062; harm check settlement-probe-262; observation time 2026-09-17T22:26Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-362; post-change test settlement-drill-462; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The settlement-lock-362 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-drill-462 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1062; harm check settlement-probe-262; observation time 2026-09-17T22:26Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-362; post-change test settlement-drill-462; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1062 cause-resolved(settlement-lock-362, checked-by=settlement-drill-462).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-14"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-14", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-15-005", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1063; harm check settlement-probe-263; observation time 2026-09-18T03:39Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-363; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-463; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The settlement-quota-363 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-fault-injection-463 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1063; harm check settlement-probe-263; observation time 2026-09-18T03:39Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-363; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-463; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1063 cause-resolved(settlement-quota-363, checked-by=settlement-fault-injection-463).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-15"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-15", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-15-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1063; harm check settlement-probe-263; observation time 2026-09-18T03:39Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-363; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-463; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The settlement-quota-363 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-fault-injection-463 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1063; harm check settlement-probe-263; observation time 2026-09-18T03:39Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-363; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-463; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1063 cause-resolved(settlement-quota-363, checked-by=settlement-fault-injection-463).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-15"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-15", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-16-003", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1064; harm check dispatch-probe-264; observation time 2026-09-11T08:52Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-364; post-change test dispatch-replay-464; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The dispatch-backlog-364 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-replay-464 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1064; harm check dispatch-probe-264; observation time 2026-09-11T08:52Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-364; post-change test dispatch-replay-464; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1064 cause-resolved(dispatch-backlog-364, checked-by=dispatch-replay-464).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-16"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-16", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-16-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1064; harm check dispatch-probe-264; observation time 2026-09-11T08:52Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-364; post-change test dispatch-replay-464; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The dispatch-backlog-364 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-replay-464 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1064; harm check dispatch-probe-264; observation time 2026-09-11T08:52Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-364; post-change test dispatch-replay-464; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1064 cause-resolved(dispatch-backlog-364, checked-by=dispatch-replay-464).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-16"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-16", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-17-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1065; harm check dispatch-probe-265; observation time 2026-09-12T13:05Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-365; post-change test dispatch-soak-465; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The dispatch-stall-365 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-soak-465 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1065; harm check dispatch-probe-265; observation time 2026-09-12T13:05Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-365; post-change test dispatch-soak-465; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1065 cause-resolved(dispatch-stall-365, checked-by=dispatch-soak-465).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-17"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-17", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-17-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1065; harm check dispatch-probe-265; observation time 2026-09-12T13:05Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-365; post-change test dispatch-soak-465; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The dispatch-stall-365 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-soak-465 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1065; harm check dispatch-probe-265; observation time 2026-09-12T13:05Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-365; post-change test dispatch-soak-465; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1065 cause-resolved(dispatch-stall-365, checked-by=dispatch-soak-465).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-17"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-17", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-18-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1066; harm check dispatch-probe-266; observation time 2026-09-13T18:18Z; suspected fault dispatch-race-366; post-change test dispatch-drill-466; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The dispatch-race-366 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-drill-466 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1066; harm check dispatch-probe-266; observation time 2026-09-13T18:18Z; suspected fault dispatch-race-366; post-change test dispatch-drill-466; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1066 cause-resolved(dispatch-race-366, checked-by=dispatch-drill-466).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-18"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-18", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-18-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1066; harm check dispatch-probe-266; observation time 2026-09-13T18:18Z; suspected fault dispatch-race-366; post-change test dispatch-drill-466; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The dispatch-race-366 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-drill-466 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1066; harm check dispatch-probe-266; observation time 2026-09-13T18:18Z; suspected fault dispatch-race-366; post-change test dispatch-drill-466; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1066 cause-resolved(dispatch-race-366, checked-by=dispatch-drill-466).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-18"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-18", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-19-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1067; harm check dispatch-probe-267; observation time 2026-09-14T23:31Z; suspected fault dispatch-leak-367; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-467; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The dispatch-leak-367 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-fault-injection-467 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1067; harm check dispatch-probe-267; observation time 2026-09-14T23:31Z; suspected fault dispatch-leak-367; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-467; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1067 cause-resolved(dispatch-leak-367, checked-by=dispatch-fault-injection-467).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-19"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-19", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-19-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1067; harm check dispatch-probe-267; observation time 2026-09-14T23:31Z; suspected fault dispatch-leak-367; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-467; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The dispatch-leak-367 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-fault-injection-467 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1067; harm check dispatch-probe-267; observation time 2026-09-14T23:31Z; suspected fault dispatch-leak-367; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-467; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1067 cause-resolved(dispatch-leak-367, checked-by=dispatch-fault-injection-467).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-19"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-19", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-20-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1068; harm check dispatch-probe-268; observation time 2026-09-15T04:44Z; suspected fault dispatch-lock-368; post-change test dispatch-replay-468; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The dispatch-lock-368 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-replay-468 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1068; harm check dispatch-probe-268; observation time 2026-09-15T04:44Z; suspected fault dispatch-lock-368; post-change test dispatch-replay-468; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1068 cause-resolved(dispatch-lock-368, checked-by=dispatch-replay-468).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-20"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-20", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-20-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1068; harm check dispatch-probe-268; observation time 2026-09-15T04:44Z; suspected fault dispatch-lock-368; post-change test dispatch-replay-468; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The dispatch-lock-368 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-replay-468 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1068; harm check dispatch-probe-268; observation time 2026-09-15T04:44Z; suspected fault dispatch-lock-368; post-change test dispatch-replay-468; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1068 cause-resolved(dispatch-lock-368, checked-by=dispatch-replay-468).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-20"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-20", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-21-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1069; harm check dispatch-probe-269; observation time 2026-09-16T09:57Z; suspected fault dispatch-quota-369; post-change test dispatch-soak-469; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The dispatch-quota-369 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-soak-469 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1069; harm check dispatch-probe-269; observation time 2026-09-16T09:57Z; suspected fault dispatch-quota-369; post-change test dispatch-soak-469; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1069 cause-resolved(dispatch-quota-369, checked-by=dispatch-soak-469).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-21"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-21", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-21-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1069; harm check dispatch-probe-269; observation time 2026-09-16T09:57Z; suspected fault dispatch-quota-369; post-change test dispatch-soak-469; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The dispatch-quota-369 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-soak-469 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1069; harm check dispatch-probe-269; observation time 2026-09-16T09:57Z; suspected fault dispatch-quota-369; post-change test dispatch-soak-469; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1069 cause-resolved(dispatch-quota-369, checked-by=dispatch-soak-469).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-21"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-21", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-22-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1070; harm check dispatch-probe-270; observation time 2026-09-17T14:10Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-370; post-change test dispatch-drill-470; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The dispatch-backlog-370 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-drill-470 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1070; harm check dispatch-probe-270; observation time 2026-09-17T14:10Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-370; post-change test dispatch-drill-470; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1070 cause-resolved(dispatch-backlog-370, checked-by=dispatch-drill-470).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-22"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-22", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-22-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1070; harm check dispatch-probe-270; observation time 2026-09-17T14:10Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-370; post-change test dispatch-drill-470; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The dispatch-backlog-370 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-drill-470 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1070; harm check dispatch-probe-270; observation time 2026-09-17T14:10Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-370; post-change test dispatch-drill-470; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1070 cause-resolved(dispatch-backlog-370, checked-by=dispatch-drill-470).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-22"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-22", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-23-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1071; harm check dispatch-probe-271; observation time 2026-09-18T19:23Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-371; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-471; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The dispatch-stall-371 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-fault-injection-471 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1071; harm check dispatch-probe-271; observation time 2026-09-18T19:23Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-371; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-471; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1071 cause-resolved(dispatch-stall-371, checked-by=dispatch-fault-injection-471).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-23"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-23", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-23-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1071; harm check dispatch-probe-271; observation time 2026-09-18T19:23Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-371; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-471; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The dispatch-stall-371 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-fault-injection-471 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1071; harm check dispatch-probe-271; observation time 2026-09-18T19:23Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-371; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-471; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1071 cause-resolved(dispatch-stall-371, checked-by=dispatch-fault-injection-471).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-23"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-23", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-24-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1072; harm check storage-probe-272; observation time 2026-09-11T00:36Z; suspected fault storage-race-372; post-change test storage-replay-472; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The storage-race-372 cause was removed and the post-change storage-replay-472 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1072; harm check storage-probe-272; observation time 2026-09-11T00:36Z; suspected fault storage-race-372; post-change test storage-replay-472; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1072 cause-resolved(storage-race-372, checked-by=storage-replay-472).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-24"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-24", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-24-003", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1072; harm check storage-probe-272; observation time 2026-09-11T00:36Z; suspected fault storage-race-372; post-change test storage-replay-472; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The storage-race-372 cause was removed and the post-change storage-replay-472 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1072; harm check storage-probe-272; observation time 2026-09-11T00:36Z; suspected fault storage-race-372; post-change test storage-replay-472; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1072 cause-resolved(storage-race-372, checked-by=storage-replay-472).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-24"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-24", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-25-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1073; harm check storage-probe-273; observation time 2026-09-12T05:49Z; suspected fault storage-leak-373; post-change test storage-soak-473; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The storage-leak-373 cause was removed and the post-change storage-soak-473 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1073; harm check storage-probe-273; observation time 2026-09-12T05:49Z; suspected fault storage-leak-373; post-change test storage-soak-473; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1073 cause-resolved(storage-leak-373, checked-by=storage-soak-473).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-25"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-25", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-25-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1073; harm check storage-probe-273; observation time 2026-09-12T05:49Z; suspected fault storage-leak-373; post-change test storage-soak-473; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The storage-leak-373 cause was removed and the post-change storage-soak-473 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1073; harm check storage-probe-273; observation time 2026-09-12T05:49Z; suspected fault storage-leak-373; post-change test storage-soak-473; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1073 cause-resolved(storage-leak-373, checked-by=storage-soak-473).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-25"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-25", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-26-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1074; harm check storage-probe-274; observation time 2026-09-13T10:02Z; suspected fault storage-lock-374; post-change test storage-drill-474; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The storage-lock-374 cause was removed and the post-change storage-drill-474 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1074; harm check storage-probe-274; observation time 2026-09-13T10:02Z; suspected fault storage-lock-374; post-change test storage-drill-474; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1074 cause-resolved(storage-lock-374, checked-by=storage-drill-474).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-26"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-26", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-26-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1074; harm check storage-probe-274; observation time 2026-09-13T10:02Z; suspected fault storage-lock-374; post-change test storage-drill-474; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The storage-lock-374 cause was removed and the post-change storage-drill-474 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1074; harm check storage-probe-274; observation time 2026-09-13T10:02Z; suspected fault storage-lock-374; post-change test storage-drill-474; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1074 cause-resolved(storage-lock-374, checked-by=storage-drill-474).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-26"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-26", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-27-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1075; harm check storage-probe-275; observation time 2026-09-14T15:15Z; suspected fault storage-quota-375; post-change test storage-fault-injection-475; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The storage-quota-375 cause was removed and the post-change storage-fault-injection-475 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1075; harm check storage-probe-275; observation time 2026-09-14T15:15Z; suspected fault storage-quota-375; post-change test storage-fault-injection-475; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1075 cause-resolved(storage-quota-375, checked-by=storage-fault-injection-475).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-27"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-27", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-27-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1075; harm check storage-probe-275; observation time 2026-09-14T15:15Z; suspected fault storage-quota-375; post-change test storage-fault-injection-475; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The storage-quota-375 cause was removed and the post-change storage-fault-injection-475 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1075; harm check storage-probe-275; observation time 2026-09-14T15:15Z; suspected fault storage-quota-375; post-change test storage-fault-injection-475; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1075 cause-resolved(storage-quota-375, checked-by=storage-fault-injection-475).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-27"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-27", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-28-004", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1076; harm check storage-probe-276; observation time 2026-09-15T20:28Z; suspected fault storage-backlog-376; post-change test storage-replay-476; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The storage-backlog-376 cause was removed and the post-change storage-replay-476 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1076; harm check storage-probe-276; observation time 2026-09-15T20:28Z; suspected fault storage-backlog-376; post-change test storage-replay-476; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1076 cause-resolved(storage-backlog-376, checked-by=storage-replay-476).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-28"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-28", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-28-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1076; harm check storage-probe-276; observation time 2026-09-15T20:28Z; suspected fault storage-backlog-376; post-change test storage-replay-476; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The storage-backlog-376 cause was removed and the post-change storage-replay-476 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1076; harm check storage-probe-276; observation time 2026-09-15T20:28Z; suspected fault storage-backlog-376; post-change test storage-replay-476; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1076 cause-resolved(storage-backlog-376, checked-by=storage-replay-476).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-28"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-28", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-29-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1077; harm check storage-probe-277; observation time 2026-09-16T01:41Z; suspected fault storage-stall-377; post-change test storage-soak-477; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The storage-stall-377 cause was removed and the post-change storage-soak-477 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1077; harm check storage-probe-277; observation time 2026-09-16T01:41Z; suspected fault storage-stall-377; post-change test storage-soak-477; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1077 cause-resolved(storage-stall-377, checked-by=storage-soak-477).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-29"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-29", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-29-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1077; harm check storage-probe-277; observation time 2026-09-16T01:41Z; suspected fault storage-stall-377; post-change test storage-soak-477; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The storage-stall-377 cause was removed and the post-change storage-soak-477 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1077; harm check storage-probe-277; observation time 2026-09-16T01:41Z; suspected fault storage-stall-377; post-change test storage-soak-477; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1077 cause-resolved(storage-stall-377, checked-by=storage-soak-477).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-29"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-29", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-30-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1078; harm check storage-probe-278; observation time 2026-09-17T06:54Z; suspected fault storage-race-378; post-change test storage-drill-478; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The storage-race-378 cause was removed and the post-change storage-drill-478 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1078; harm check storage-probe-278; observation time 2026-09-17T06:54Z; suspected fault storage-race-378; post-change test storage-drill-478; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1078 cause-resolved(storage-race-378, checked-by=storage-drill-478).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-30"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-30", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-30-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1078; harm check storage-probe-278; observation time 2026-09-17T06:54Z; suspected fault storage-race-378; post-change test storage-drill-478; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The storage-race-378 cause was removed and the post-change storage-drill-478 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1078; harm check storage-probe-278; observation time 2026-09-17T06:54Z; suspected fault storage-race-378; post-change test storage-drill-478; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1078 cause-resolved(storage-race-378, checked-by=storage-drill-478).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-30"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-30", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-31-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1079; harm check storage-probe-279; observation time 2026-09-18T11:07Z; suspected fault storage-leak-379; post-change test storage-fault-injection-479; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The storage-leak-379 cause was removed and the post-change storage-fault-injection-479 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1079; harm check storage-probe-279; observation time 2026-09-18T11:07Z; suspected fault storage-leak-379; post-change test storage-fault-injection-479; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1079 cause-resolved(storage-leak-379, checked-by=storage-fault-injection-479).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-31"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-31", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-31-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1079; harm check storage-probe-279; observation time 2026-09-18T11:07Z; suspected fault storage-leak-379; post-change test storage-fault-injection-479; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The storage-leak-379 cause was removed and the post-change storage-fault-injection-479 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1079; harm check storage-probe-279; observation time 2026-09-18T11:07Z; suspected fault storage-leak-379; post-change test storage-fault-injection-479; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1079 cause-resolved(storage-leak-379, checked-by=storage-fault-injection-479).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-31"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-31", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-32-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1080; harm check provisioning-probe-280; observation time 2026-09-11T16:20Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-380; post-change test provisioning-replay-480; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The provisioning-lock-380 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-replay-480 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1080; harm check provisioning-probe-280; observation time 2026-09-11T16:20Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-380; post-change test provisioning-replay-480; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1080 cause-resolved(provisioning-lock-380, checked-by=provisioning-replay-480).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-32"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-32", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-32-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1080; harm check provisioning-probe-280; observation time 2026-09-11T16:20Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-380; post-change test provisioning-replay-480; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The provisioning-lock-380 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-replay-480 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1080; harm check provisioning-probe-280; observation time 2026-09-11T16:20Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-380; post-change test provisioning-replay-480; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1080 cause-resolved(provisioning-lock-380, checked-by=provisioning-replay-480).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-32"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-32", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-33-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1081; harm check provisioning-probe-281; observation time 2026-09-12T21:33Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-381; post-change test provisioning-soak-481; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The provisioning-quota-381 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-soak-481 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1081; harm check provisioning-probe-281; observation time 2026-09-12T21:33Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-381; post-change test provisioning-soak-481; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1081 cause-resolved(provisioning-quota-381, checked-by=provisioning-soak-481).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-33"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-33", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-33-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1081; harm check provisioning-probe-281; observation time 2026-09-12T21:33Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-381; post-change test provisioning-soak-481; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The provisioning-quota-381 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-soak-481 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1081; harm check provisioning-probe-281; observation time 2026-09-12T21:33Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-381; post-change test provisioning-soak-481; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1081 cause-resolved(provisioning-quota-381, checked-by=provisioning-soak-481).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-33"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-33", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-34-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1082; harm check provisioning-probe-282; observation time 2026-09-13T02:46Z; suspected fault provisioning-backlog-382; post-change test provisioning-drill-482; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The provisioning-backlog-382 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-drill-482 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1082; harm check provisioning-probe-282; observation time 2026-09-13T02:46Z; suspected fault provisioning-backlog-382; post-change test provisioning-drill-482; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1082 cause-resolved(provisioning-backlog-382, checked-by=provisioning-drill-482).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-34"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-34", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-34-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1082; harm check provisioning-probe-282; observation time 2026-09-13T02:46Z; suspected fault provisioning-backlog-382; post-change test provisioning-drill-482; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The provisioning-backlog-382 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-drill-482 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1082; harm check provisioning-probe-282; observation time 2026-09-13T02:46Z; suspected fault provisioning-backlog-382; post-change test provisioning-drill-482; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1082 cause-resolved(provisioning-backlog-382, checked-by=provisioning-drill-482).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-34"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-34", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-35-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1083; harm check provisioning-probe-283; observation time 2026-09-14T07:59Z; suspected fault provisioning-stall-383; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-483; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The provisioning-stall-383 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-fault-injection-483 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1083; harm check provisioning-probe-283; observation time 2026-09-14T07:59Z; suspected fault provisioning-stall-383; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-483; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1083 cause-resolved(provisioning-stall-383, checked-by=provisioning-fault-injection-483).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-35"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-35", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-35-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1083; harm check provisioning-probe-283; observation time 2026-09-14T07:59Z; suspected fault provisioning-stall-383; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-483; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The provisioning-stall-383 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-fault-injection-483 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1083; harm check provisioning-probe-283; observation time 2026-09-14T07:59Z; suspected fault provisioning-stall-383; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-483; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1083 cause-resolved(provisioning-stall-383, checked-by=provisioning-fault-injection-483).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-35"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-35", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-36-006", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1084; harm check provisioning-probe-284; observation time 2026-09-15T12:12Z; suspected fault provisioning-race-384; post-change test provisioning-replay-484; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The provisioning-race-384 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-replay-484 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1084; harm check provisioning-probe-284; observation time 2026-09-15T12:12Z; suspected fault provisioning-race-384; post-change test provisioning-replay-484; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1084 cause-resolved(provisioning-race-384, checked-by=provisioning-replay-484).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "neither of those"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-36"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-36", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-36-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1084; harm check provisioning-probe-284; observation time 2026-09-15T12:12Z; suspected fault provisioning-race-384; post-change test provisioning-replay-484; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The provisioning-race-384 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-replay-484 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1084; harm check provisioning-probe-284; observation time 2026-09-15T12:12Z; suspected fault provisioning-race-384; post-change test provisioning-replay-484; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1084 cause-resolved(provisioning-race-384, checked-by=provisioning-replay-484).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-36"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-36", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-37-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1085; harm check provisioning-probe-285; observation time 2026-09-16T17:25Z; suspected fault provisioning-leak-385; post-change test provisioning-soak-485; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The provisioning-leak-385 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-soak-485 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1085; harm check provisioning-probe-285; observation time 2026-09-16T17:25Z; suspected fault provisioning-leak-385; post-change test provisioning-soak-485; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1085 cause-resolved(provisioning-leak-385, checked-by=provisioning-soak-485).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-37"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-37", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-37-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1085; harm check provisioning-probe-285; observation time 2026-09-16T17:25Z; suspected fault provisioning-leak-385; post-change test provisioning-soak-485; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The provisioning-leak-385 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-soak-485 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1085; harm check provisioning-probe-285; observation time 2026-09-16T17:25Z; suspected fault provisioning-leak-385; post-change test provisioning-soak-485; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1085 cause-resolved(provisioning-leak-385, checked-by=provisioning-soak-485).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-37"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-37", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-38-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1086; harm check provisioning-probe-286; observation time 2026-09-17T22:38Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-386; post-change test provisioning-drill-486; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The provisioning-lock-386 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-drill-486 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1086; harm check provisioning-probe-286; observation time 2026-09-17T22:38Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-386; post-change test provisioning-drill-486; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1086 cause-resolved(provisioning-lock-386, checked-by=provisioning-drill-486).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-38"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-38", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-38-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1086; harm check provisioning-probe-286; observation time 2026-09-17T22:38Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-386; post-change test provisioning-drill-486; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The provisioning-lock-386 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-drill-486 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1086; harm check provisioning-probe-286; observation time 2026-09-17T22:38Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-386; post-change test provisioning-drill-486; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1086 cause-resolved(provisioning-lock-386, checked-by=provisioning-drill-486).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-38"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-38", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-39-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1087; harm check provisioning-probe-287; observation time 2026-09-18T03:51Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-387; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-487; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The provisioning-quota-387 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-fault-injection-487 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1087; harm check provisioning-probe-287; observation time 2026-09-18T03:51Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-387; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-487; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1087 cause-resolved(provisioning-quota-387, checked-by=provisioning-fault-injection-487).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "neither of those"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-39"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-39", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-39-004", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1087; harm check provisioning-probe-287; observation time 2026-09-18T03:51Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-387; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-487; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The provisioning-quota-387 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-fault-injection-487 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1087; harm check provisioning-probe-287; observation time 2026-09-18T03:51Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-387; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-487; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1087 cause-resolved(provisioning-quota-387, checked-by=provisioning-fault-injection-487).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-39"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-39", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-40-004", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1088; harm check notifications-probe-288; observation time 2026-09-11T08:04Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-388; post-change test notifications-replay-488; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The notifications-backlog-388 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-replay-488 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1088; harm check notifications-probe-288; observation time 2026-09-11T08:04Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-388; post-change test notifications-replay-488; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1088 cause-resolved(notifications-backlog-388, checked-by=notifications-replay-488).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-40"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-40", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-40-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1088; harm check notifications-probe-288; observation time 2026-09-11T08:04Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-388; post-change test notifications-replay-488; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The notifications-backlog-388 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-replay-488 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1088; harm check notifications-probe-288; observation time 2026-09-11T08:04Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-388; post-change test notifications-replay-488; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1088 cause-resolved(notifications-backlog-388, checked-by=notifications-replay-488).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-40"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-40", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-41-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1089; harm check notifications-probe-289; observation time 2026-09-12T13:17Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-389; post-change test notifications-soak-489; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The notifications-stall-389 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-soak-489 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1089; harm check notifications-probe-289; observation time 2026-09-12T13:17Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-389; post-change test notifications-soak-489; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1089 cause-resolved(notifications-stall-389, checked-by=notifications-soak-489).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-41"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-41", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-41-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1089; harm check notifications-probe-289; observation time 2026-09-12T13:17Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-389; post-change test notifications-soak-489; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The notifications-stall-389 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-soak-489 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1089; harm check notifications-probe-289; observation time 2026-09-12T13:17Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-389; post-change test notifications-soak-489; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1089 cause-resolved(notifications-stall-389, checked-by=notifications-soak-489).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-41"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-41", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-42-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1090; harm check notifications-probe-290; observation time 2026-09-13T18:30Z; suspected fault notifications-race-390; post-change test notifications-drill-490; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The notifications-race-390 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-drill-490 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1090; harm check notifications-probe-290; observation time 2026-09-13T18:30Z; suspected fault notifications-race-390; post-change test notifications-drill-490; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1090 cause-resolved(notifications-race-390, checked-by=notifications-drill-490).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-42"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-42", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-42-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1090; harm check notifications-probe-290; observation time 2026-09-13T18:30Z; suspected fault notifications-race-390; post-change test notifications-drill-490; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The notifications-race-390 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-drill-490 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1090; harm check notifications-probe-290; observation time 2026-09-13T18:30Z; suspected fault notifications-race-390; post-change test notifications-drill-490; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1090 cause-resolved(notifications-race-390, checked-by=notifications-drill-490).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-42"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-42", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-43-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1091; harm check notifications-probe-291; observation time 2026-09-14T23:43Z; suspected fault notifications-leak-391; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-491; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The notifications-leak-391 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-fault-injection-491 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1091; harm check notifications-probe-291; observation time 2026-09-14T23:43Z; suspected fault notifications-leak-391; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-491; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1091 cause-resolved(notifications-leak-391, checked-by=notifications-fault-injection-491).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-43"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-43", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-43-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1091; harm check notifications-probe-291; observation time 2026-09-14T23:43Z; suspected fault notifications-leak-391; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-491; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The notifications-leak-391 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-fault-injection-491 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1091; harm check notifications-probe-291; observation time 2026-09-14T23:43Z; suspected fault notifications-leak-391; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-491; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1091 cause-resolved(notifications-leak-391, checked-by=notifications-fault-injection-491).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-43"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-43", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-44-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1092; harm check notifications-probe-292; observation time 2026-09-15T04:56Z; suspected fault notifications-lock-392; post-change test notifications-replay-492; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The notifications-lock-392 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-replay-492 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1092; harm check notifications-probe-292; observation time 2026-09-15T04:56Z; suspected fault notifications-lock-392; post-change test notifications-replay-492; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1092 cause-resolved(notifications-lock-392, checked-by=notifications-replay-492).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-44"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-44", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-44-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1092; harm check notifications-probe-292; observation time 2026-09-15T04:56Z; suspected fault notifications-lock-392; post-change test notifications-replay-492; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The notifications-lock-392 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-replay-492 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1092; harm check notifications-probe-292; observation time 2026-09-15T04:56Z; suspected fault notifications-lock-392; post-change test notifications-replay-492; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1092 cause-resolved(notifications-lock-392, checked-by=notifications-replay-492).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-44"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-44", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-45-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1093; harm check notifications-probe-293; observation time 2026-09-16T09:09Z; suspected fault notifications-quota-393; post-change test notifications-soak-493; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The notifications-quota-393 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-soak-493 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1093; harm check notifications-probe-293; observation time 2026-09-16T09:09Z; suspected fault notifications-quota-393; post-change test notifications-soak-493; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1093 cause-resolved(notifications-quota-393, checked-by=notifications-soak-493).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-45"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-45", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-45-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1093; harm check notifications-probe-293; observation time 2026-09-16T09:09Z; suspected fault notifications-quota-393; post-change test notifications-soak-493; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The notifications-quota-393 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-soak-493 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1093; harm check notifications-probe-293; observation time 2026-09-16T09:09Z; suspected fault notifications-quota-393; post-change test notifications-soak-493; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1093 cause-resolved(notifications-quota-393, checked-by=notifications-soak-493).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-45"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-45", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-46-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1094; harm check notifications-probe-294; observation time 2026-09-17T14:22Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-394; post-change test notifications-drill-494; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The notifications-backlog-394 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-drill-494 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1094; harm check notifications-probe-294; observation time 2026-09-17T14:22Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-394; post-change test notifications-drill-494; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1094 cause-resolved(notifications-backlog-394, checked-by=notifications-drill-494).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-46"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-46", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-46-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1094; harm check notifications-probe-294; observation time 2026-09-17T14:22Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-394; post-change test notifications-drill-494; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The notifications-backlog-394 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-drill-494 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1094; harm check notifications-probe-294; observation time 2026-09-17T14:22Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-394; post-change test notifications-drill-494; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1094 cause-resolved(notifications-backlog-394, checked-by=notifications-drill-494).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-46"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-46", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-ass-47-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1095; harm check notifications-probe-295; observation time 2026-09-18T19:35Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-395; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-495; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The notifications-stall-395 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-fault-injection-495 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1095; harm check notifications-probe-295; observation time 2026-09-18T19:35Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-395; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-495; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1095 cause-resolved(notifications-stall-395, checked-by=notifications-fault-injection-495).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-47"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-47", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-cause-only-rou-47-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1095; harm check notifications-probe-295; observation time 2026-09-18T19:35Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-395; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-495; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The notifications-stall-395 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-fault-injection-495 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1095; harm check notifications-probe-295; observation time 2026-09-18T19:35Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-395; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-495; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1095 cause-resolved(notifications-stall-395, checked-by=notifications-fault-injection-495).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "only the repair workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "cause-only::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "cause-only", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-47"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-cause-only-47", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "cause-only"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-00-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1096; harm check ingest-probe-296; observation time 2026-09-11T00:48Z; suspected fault ingest-race-396; post-change test ingest-replay-496; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1096 impact was absent under ingest-probe-296 at 2026-09-11T00:48Z. Separately, the ingest-race-396 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-replay-496 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1096; harm check ingest-probe-296; observation time 2026-09-11T00:48Z; suspected fault ingest-race-396; post-change test ingest-replay-496; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1096 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-296@2026-09-11T00:48Z). ingest-inc-1096 cause-resolved(ingest-race-396, checked-by=ingest-replay-496).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-00"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-00", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-00-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1096; harm check ingest-probe-296; observation time 2026-09-11T00:48Z; suspected fault ingest-race-396; post-change test ingest-replay-496; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1096 impact was absent under ingest-probe-296 at 2026-09-11T00:48Z. Separately, the ingest-race-396 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-replay-496 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1096; harm check ingest-probe-296; observation time 2026-09-11T00:48Z; suspected fault ingest-race-396; post-change test ingest-replay-496; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1096 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-296@2026-09-11T00:48Z). ingest-inc-1096 cause-resolved(ingest-race-396, checked-by=ingest-replay-496).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-00"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-00", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-01-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1097; harm check ingest-probe-297; observation time 2026-09-12T05:01Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-397; post-change test ingest-soak-497; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1097 impact was absent under ingest-probe-297 at 2026-09-12T05:01Z. Separately, the ingest-leak-397 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-soak-497 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1097; harm check ingest-probe-297; observation time 2026-09-12T05:01Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-397; post-change test ingest-soak-497; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1097 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-297@2026-09-12T05:01Z). ingest-inc-1097 cause-resolved(ingest-leak-397, checked-by=ingest-soak-497).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-01"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-01", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-01-006", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1097; harm check ingest-probe-297; observation time 2026-09-12T05:01Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-397; post-change test ingest-soak-497; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1097 impact was absent under ingest-probe-297 at 2026-09-12T05:01Z. Separately, the ingest-leak-397 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-soak-497 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1097; harm check ingest-probe-297; observation time 2026-09-12T05:01Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-397; post-change test ingest-soak-497; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1097 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-297@2026-09-12T05:01Z). ingest-inc-1097 cause-resolved(ingest-leak-397, checked-by=ingest-soak-497).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-01"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-01", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-02-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1098; harm check ingest-probe-298; observation time 2026-09-13T10:14Z; suspected fault ingest-lock-398; post-change test ingest-drill-498; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1098 impact was absent under ingest-probe-298 at 2026-09-13T10:14Z. Separately, the ingest-lock-398 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-drill-498 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1098; harm check ingest-probe-298; observation time 2026-09-13T10:14Z; suspected fault ingest-lock-398; post-change test ingest-drill-498; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1098 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-298@2026-09-13T10:14Z). ingest-inc-1098 cause-resolved(ingest-lock-398, checked-by=ingest-drill-498).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-02"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-02", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-02-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1098; harm check ingest-probe-298; observation time 2026-09-13T10:14Z; suspected fault ingest-lock-398; post-change test ingest-drill-498; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1098 impact was absent under ingest-probe-298 at 2026-09-13T10:14Z. Separately, the ingest-lock-398 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-drill-498 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1098; harm check ingest-probe-298; observation time 2026-09-13T10:14Z; suspected fault ingest-lock-398; post-change test ingest-drill-498; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1098 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-298@2026-09-13T10:14Z). ingest-inc-1098 cause-resolved(ingest-lock-398, checked-by=ingest-drill-498).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-02"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-02", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-03-008", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1099; harm check ingest-probe-299; observation time 2026-09-14T15:27Z; suspected fault ingest-quota-399; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-499; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1099 impact was absent under ingest-probe-299 at 2026-09-14T15:27Z. Separately, the ingest-quota-399 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-fault-injection-499 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1099; harm check ingest-probe-299; observation time 2026-09-14T15:27Z; suspected fault ingest-quota-399; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-499; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1099 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-299@2026-09-14T15:27Z). ingest-inc-1099 cause-resolved(ingest-quota-399, checked-by=ingest-fault-injection-499).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-03"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-03", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-03-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1099; harm check ingest-probe-299; observation time 2026-09-14T15:27Z; suspected fault ingest-quota-399; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-499; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1099 impact was absent under ingest-probe-299 at 2026-09-14T15:27Z. Separately, the ingest-quota-399 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-fault-injection-499 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1099; harm check ingest-probe-299; observation time 2026-09-14T15:27Z; suspected fault ingest-quota-399; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-499; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1099 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-299@2026-09-14T15:27Z). ingest-inc-1099 cause-resolved(ingest-quota-399, checked-by=ingest-fault-injection-499).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-03"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-03", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-04-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1100; harm check ingest-probe-300; observation time 2026-09-15T20:40Z; suspected fault ingest-backlog-400; post-change test ingest-replay-500; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1100 impact was absent under ingest-probe-300 at 2026-09-15T20:40Z. Separately, the ingest-backlog-400 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-replay-500 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1100; harm check ingest-probe-300; observation time 2026-09-15T20:40Z; suspected fault ingest-backlog-400; post-change test ingest-replay-500; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1100 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-300@2026-09-15T20:40Z). ingest-inc-1100 cause-resolved(ingest-backlog-400, checked-by=ingest-replay-500).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-04"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-04", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-04-003", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1100; harm check ingest-probe-300; observation time 2026-09-15T20:40Z; suspected fault ingest-backlog-400; post-change test ingest-replay-500; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1100 impact was absent under ingest-probe-300 at 2026-09-15T20:40Z. Separately, the ingest-backlog-400 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-replay-500 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1100; harm check ingest-probe-300; observation time 2026-09-15T20:40Z; suspected fault ingest-backlog-400; post-change test ingest-replay-500; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1100 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-300@2026-09-15T20:40Z). ingest-inc-1100 cause-resolved(ingest-backlog-400, checked-by=ingest-replay-500).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-04"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-04", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-05-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1101; harm check ingest-probe-301; observation time 2026-09-16T01:53Z; suspected fault ingest-stall-401; post-change test ingest-soak-501; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1101 impact was absent under ingest-probe-301 at 2026-09-16T01:53Z. Separately, the ingest-stall-401 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-soak-501 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1101; harm check ingest-probe-301; observation time 2026-09-16T01:53Z; suspected fault ingest-stall-401; post-change test ingest-soak-501; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1101 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-301@2026-09-16T01:53Z). ingest-inc-1101 cause-resolved(ingest-stall-401, checked-by=ingest-soak-501).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-05"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-05", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-05-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1101; harm check ingest-probe-301; observation time 2026-09-16T01:53Z; suspected fault ingest-stall-401; post-change test ingest-soak-501; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1101 impact was absent under ingest-probe-301 at 2026-09-16T01:53Z. Separately, the ingest-stall-401 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-soak-501 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1101; harm check ingest-probe-301; observation time 2026-09-16T01:53Z; suspected fault ingest-stall-401; post-change test ingest-soak-501; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1101 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-301@2026-09-16T01:53Z). ingest-inc-1101 cause-resolved(ingest-stall-401, checked-by=ingest-soak-501).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-05"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-05", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-06-003", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1102; harm check ingest-probe-302; observation time 2026-09-17T06:06Z; suspected fault ingest-race-402; post-change test ingest-drill-502; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1102 impact was absent under ingest-probe-302 at 2026-09-17T06:06Z. Separately, the ingest-race-402 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-drill-502 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1102; harm check ingest-probe-302; observation time 2026-09-17T06:06Z; suspected fault ingest-race-402; post-change test ingest-drill-502; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1102 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-302@2026-09-17T06:06Z). ingest-inc-1102 cause-resolved(ingest-race-402, checked-by=ingest-drill-502).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-06"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-06", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-06-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1102; harm check ingest-probe-302; observation time 2026-09-17T06:06Z; suspected fault ingest-race-402; post-change test ingest-drill-502; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1102 impact was absent under ingest-probe-302 at 2026-09-17T06:06Z. Separately, the ingest-race-402 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-drill-502 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1102; harm check ingest-probe-302; observation time 2026-09-17T06:06Z; suspected fault ingest-race-402; post-change test ingest-drill-502; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1102 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-302@2026-09-17T06:06Z). ingest-inc-1102 cause-resolved(ingest-race-402, checked-by=ingest-drill-502).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-06"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-06", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-07-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1103; harm check ingest-probe-303; observation time 2026-09-18T11:19Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-403; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-503; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1103 impact was absent under ingest-probe-303 at 2026-09-18T11:19Z. Separately, the ingest-leak-403 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-fault-injection-503 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1103; harm check ingest-probe-303; observation time 2026-09-18T11:19Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-403; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-503; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1103 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-303@2026-09-18T11:19Z). ingest-inc-1103 cause-resolved(ingest-leak-403, checked-by=ingest-fault-injection-503).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-07"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-07", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-07-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1103; harm check ingest-probe-303; observation time 2026-09-18T11:19Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-403; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-503; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named ingest-inc-1103 impact was absent under ingest-probe-303 at 2026-09-18T11:19Z. Separately, the ingest-leak-403 cause was removed and the post-change ingest-fault-injection-503 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1103; harm check ingest-probe-303; observation time 2026-09-18T11:19Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-403; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-503; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1103 impact-recovered(ingest-probe-303@2026-09-18T11:19Z). ingest-inc-1103 cause-resolved(ingest-leak-403, checked-by=ingest-fault-injection-503).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-07"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-07", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-08-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1104; harm check settlement-probe-304; observation time 2026-09-11T16:32Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-404; post-change test settlement-replay-504; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1104 impact was absent under settlement-probe-304 at 2026-09-11T16:32Z. Separately, the settlement-lock-404 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-replay-504 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1104; harm check settlement-probe-304; observation time 2026-09-11T16:32Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-404; post-change test settlement-replay-504; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1104 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-304@2026-09-11T16:32Z). settlement-inc-1104 cause-resolved(settlement-lock-404, checked-by=settlement-replay-504).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-08"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-08", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-08-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1104; harm check settlement-probe-304; observation time 2026-09-11T16:32Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-404; post-change test settlement-replay-504; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1104 impact was absent under settlement-probe-304 at 2026-09-11T16:32Z. Separately, the settlement-lock-404 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-replay-504 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1104; harm check settlement-probe-304; observation time 2026-09-11T16:32Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-404; post-change test settlement-replay-504; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1104 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-304@2026-09-11T16:32Z). settlement-inc-1104 cause-resolved(settlement-lock-404, checked-by=settlement-replay-504).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-08"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-08", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-09-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1105; harm check settlement-probe-305; observation time 2026-09-12T21:45Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-405; post-change test settlement-soak-505; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1105 impact was absent under settlement-probe-305 at 2026-09-12T21:45Z. Separately, the settlement-quota-405 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-soak-505 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1105; harm check settlement-probe-305; observation time 2026-09-12T21:45Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-405; post-change test settlement-soak-505; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1105 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-305@2026-09-12T21:45Z). settlement-inc-1105 cause-resolved(settlement-quota-405, checked-by=settlement-soak-505).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-09"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-09", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-09-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1105; harm check settlement-probe-305; observation time 2026-09-12T21:45Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-405; post-change test settlement-soak-505; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1105 impact was absent under settlement-probe-305 at 2026-09-12T21:45Z. Separately, the settlement-quota-405 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-soak-505 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1105; harm check settlement-probe-305; observation time 2026-09-12T21:45Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-405; post-change test settlement-soak-505; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1105 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-305@2026-09-12T21:45Z). settlement-inc-1105 cause-resolved(settlement-quota-405, checked-by=settlement-soak-505).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-09"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-09", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-10-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1106; harm check settlement-probe-306; observation time 2026-09-13T02:58Z; suspected fault settlement-backlog-406; post-change test settlement-drill-506; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1106 impact was absent under settlement-probe-306 at 2026-09-13T02:58Z. Separately, the settlement-backlog-406 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-drill-506 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1106; harm check settlement-probe-306; observation time 2026-09-13T02:58Z; suspected fault settlement-backlog-406; post-change test settlement-drill-506; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1106 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-306@2026-09-13T02:58Z). settlement-inc-1106 cause-resolved(settlement-backlog-406, checked-by=settlement-drill-506).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-10"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-10", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-10-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1106; harm check settlement-probe-306; observation time 2026-09-13T02:58Z; suspected fault settlement-backlog-406; post-change test settlement-drill-506; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1106 impact was absent under settlement-probe-306 at 2026-09-13T02:58Z. Separately, the settlement-backlog-406 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-drill-506 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1106; harm check settlement-probe-306; observation time 2026-09-13T02:58Z; suspected fault settlement-backlog-406; post-change test settlement-drill-506; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1106 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-306@2026-09-13T02:58Z). settlement-inc-1106 cause-resolved(settlement-backlog-406, checked-by=settlement-drill-506).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-10"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-10", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-11-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1107; harm check settlement-probe-307; observation time 2026-09-14T07:11Z; suspected fault settlement-stall-407; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-507; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1107 impact was absent under settlement-probe-307 at 2026-09-14T07:11Z. Separately, the settlement-stall-407 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-fault-injection-507 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1107; harm check settlement-probe-307; observation time 2026-09-14T07:11Z; suspected fault settlement-stall-407; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-507; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1107 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-307@2026-09-14T07:11Z). settlement-inc-1107 cause-resolved(settlement-stall-407, checked-by=settlement-fault-injection-507).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-11"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-11", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-11-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1107; harm check settlement-probe-307; observation time 2026-09-14T07:11Z; suspected fault settlement-stall-407; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-507; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1107 impact was absent under settlement-probe-307 at 2026-09-14T07:11Z. Separately, the settlement-stall-407 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-fault-injection-507 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1107; harm check settlement-probe-307; observation time 2026-09-14T07:11Z; suspected fault settlement-stall-407; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-507; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1107 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-307@2026-09-14T07:11Z). settlement-inc-1107 cause-resolved(settlement-stall-407, checked-by=settlement-fault-injection-507).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-11"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-11", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-12-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1108; harm check settlement-probe-308; observation time 2026-09-15T12:24Z; suspected fault settlement-race-408; post-change test settlement-replay-508; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1108 impact was absent under settlement-probe-308 at 2026-09-15T12:24Z. Separately, the settlement-race-408 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-replay-508 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1108; harm check settlement-probe-308; observation time 2026-09-15T12:24Z; suspected fault settlement-race-408; post-change test settlement-replay-508; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1108 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-308@2026-09-15T12:24Z). settlement-inc-1108 cause-resolved(settlement-race-408, checked-by=settlement-replay-508).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "both of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-12"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-12", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-12-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1108; harm check settlement-probe-308; observation time 2026-09-15T12:24Z; suspected fault settlement-race-408; post-change test settlement-replay-508; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1108 impact was absent under settlement-probe-308 at 2026-09-15T12:24Z. Separately, the settlement-race-408 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-replay-508 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1108; harm check settlement-probe-308; observation time 2026-09-15T12:24Z; suspected fault settlement-race-408; post-change test settlement-replay-508; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1108 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-308@2026-09-15T12:24Z). settlement-inc-1108 cause-resolved(settlement-race-408, checked-by=settlement-replay-508).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-12"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-12", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-13-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1109; harm check settlement-probe-309; observation time 2026-09-16T17:37Z; suspected fault settlement-leak-409; post-change test settlement-soak-509; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1109 impact was absent under settlement-probe-309 at 2026-09-16T17:37Z. Separately, the settlement-leak-409 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-soak-509 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1109; harm check settlement-probe-309; observation time 2026-09-16T17:37Z; suspected fault settlement-leak-409; post-change test settlement-soak-509; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1109 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-309@2026-09-16T17:37Z). settlement-inc-1109 cause-resolved(settlement-leak-409, checked-by=settlement-soak-509).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "both of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-13"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-13", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-13-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1109; harm check settlement-probe-309; observation time 2026-09-16T17:37Z; suspected fault settlement-leak-409; post-change test settlement-soak-509; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1109 impact was absent under settlement-probe-309 at 2026-09-16T17:37Z. Separately, the settlement-leak-409 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-soak-509 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1109; harm check settlement-probe-309; observation time 2026-09-16T17:37Z; suspected fault settlement-leak-409; post-change test settlement-soak-509; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1109 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-309@2026-09-16T17:37Z). settlement-inc-1109 cause-resolved(settlement-leak-409, checked-by=settlement-soak-509).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-13"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-13", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-14-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1110; harm check settlement-probe-310; observation time 2026-09-17T22:50Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-410; post-change test settlement-drill-510; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1110 impact was absent under settlement-probe-310 at 2026-09-17T22:50Z. Separately, the settlement-lock-410 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-drill-510 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1110; harm check settlement-probe-310; observation time 2026-09-17T22:50Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-410; post-change test settlement-drill-510; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1110 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-310@2026-09-17T22:50Z). settlement-inc-1110 cause-resolved(settlement-lock-410, checked-by=settlement-drill-510).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "both of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-14"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-14", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-14-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1110; harm check settlement-probe-310; observation time 2026-09-17T22:50Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-410; post-change test settlement-drill-510; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1110 impact was absent under settlement-probe-310 at 2026-09-17T22:50Z. Separately, the settlement-lock-410 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-drill-510 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1110; harm check settlement-probe-310; observation time 2026-09-17T22:50Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-410; post-change test settlement-drill-510; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1110 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-310@2026-09-17T22:50Z). settlement-inc-1110 cause-resolved(settlement-lock-410, checked-by=settlement-drill-510).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-14"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-14", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-15-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1111; harm check settlement-probe-311; observation time 2026-09-18T03:03Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-411; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-511; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1111 impact was absent under settlement-probe-311 at 2026-09-18T03:03Z. Separately, the settlement-quota-411 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-fault-injection-511 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1111; harm check settlement-probe-311; observation time 2026-09-18T03:03Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-411; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-511; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1111 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-311@2026-09-18T03:03Z). settlement-inc-1111 cause-resolved(settlement-quota-411, checked-by=settlement-fault-injection-511).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-15"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-15", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-15-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1111; harm check settlement-probe-311; observation time 2026-09-18T03:03Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-411; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-511; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named settlement-inc-1111 impact was absent under settlement-probe-311 at 2026-09-18T03:03Z. Separately, the settlement-quota-411 cause was removed and the post-change settlement-fault-injection-511 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1111; harm check settlement-probe-311; observation time 2026-09-18T03:03Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-411; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-511; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1111 impact-recovered(settlement-probe-311@2026-09-18T03:03Z). settlement-inc-1111 cause-resolved(settlement-quota-411, checked-by=settlement-fault-injection-511).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-15"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-15", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-16-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1112; harm check dispatch-probe-312; observation time 2026-09-11T08:16Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-412; post-change test dispatch-replay-512; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1112 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-312 at 2026-09-11T08:16Z. Separately, the dispatch-backlog-412 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-replay-512 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1112; harm check dispatch-probe-312; observation time 2026-09-11T08:16Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-412; post-change test dispatch-replay-512; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1112 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-312@2026-09-11T08:16Z). dispatch-inc-1112 cause-resolved(dispatch-backlog-412, checked-by=dispatch-replay-512).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-16"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-16", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-16-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1112; harm check dispatch-probe-312; observation time 2026-09-11T08:16Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-412; post-change test dispatch-replay-512; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1112 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-312 at 2026-09-11T08:16Z. Separately, the dispatch-backlog-412 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-replay-512 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1112; harm check dispatch-probe-312; observation time 2026-09-11T08:16Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-412; post-change test dispatch-replay-512; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1112 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-312@2026-09-11T08:16Z). dispatch-inc-1112 cause-resolved(dispatch-backlog-412, checked-by=dispatch-replay-512).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-16"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-16", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-17-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1113; harm check dispatch-probe-313; observation time 2026-09-12T13:29Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-413; post-change test dispatch-soak-513; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1113 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-313 at 2026-09-12T13:29Z. Separately, the dispatch-stall-413 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-soak-513 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1113; harm check dispatch-probe-313; observation time 2026-09-12T13:29Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-413; post-change test dispatch-soak-513; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1113 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-313@2026-09-12T13:29Z). dispatch-inc-1113 cause-resolved(dispatch-stall-413, checked-by=dispatch-soak-513).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-17"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-17", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-17-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1113; harm check dispatch-probe-313; observation time 2026-09-12T13:29Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-413; post-change test dispatch-soak-513; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1113 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-313 at 2026-09-12T13:29Z. Separately, the dispatch-stall-413 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-soak-513 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1113; harm check dispatch-probe-313; observation time 2026-09-12T13:29Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-413; post-change test dispatch-soak-513; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1113 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-313@2026-09-12T13:29Z). dispatch-inc-1113 cause-resolved(dispatch-stall-413, checked-by=dispatch-soak-513).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-17"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-17", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-18-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1114; harm check dispatch-probe-314; observation time 2026-09-13T18:42Z; suspected fault dispatch-race-414; post-change test dispatch-drill-514; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1114 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-314 at 2026-09-13T18:42Z. Separately, the dispatch-race-414 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-drill-514 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1114; harm check dispatch-probe-314; observation time 2026-09-13T18:42Z; suspected fault dispatch-race-414; post-change test dispatch-drill-514; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1114 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-314@2026-09-13T18:42Z). dispatch-inc-1114 cause-resolved(dispatch-race-414, checked-by=dispatch-drill-514).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "neither of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-18"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-18", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-18-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1114; harm check dispatch-probe-314; observation time 2026-09-13T18:42Z; suspected fault dispatch-race-414; post-change test dispatch-drill-514; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1114 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-314 at 2026-09-13T18:42Z. Separately, the dispatch-race-414 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-drill-514 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1114; harm check dispatch-probe-314; observation time 2026-09-13T18:42Z; suspected fault dispatch-race-414; post-change test dispatch-drill-514; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1114 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-314@2026-09-13T18:42Z). dispatch-inc-1114 cause-resolved(dispatch-race-414, checked-by=dispatch-drill-514).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-18"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-18", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-19-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1115; harm check dispatch-probe-315; observation time 2026-09-14T23:55Z; suspected fault dispatch-leak-415; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-515; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1115 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-315 at 2026-09-14T23:55Z. Separately, the dispatch-leak-415 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-fault-injection-515 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1115; harm check dispatch-probe-315; observation time 2026-09-14T23:55Z; suspected fault dispatch-leak-415; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-515; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1115 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-315@2026-09-14T23:55Z). dispatch-inc-1115 cause-resolved(dispatch-leak-415, checked-by=dispatch-fault-injection-515).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-19"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-19", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-19-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1115; harm check dispatch-probe-315; observation time 2026-09-14T23:55Z; suspected fault dispatch-leak-415; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-515; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1115 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-315 at 2026-09-14T23:55Z. Separately, the dispatch-leak-415 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-fault-injection-515 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1115; harm check dispatch-probe-315; observation time 2026-09-14T23:55Z; suspected fault dispatch-leak-415; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-515; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1115 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-315@2026-09-14T23:55Z). dispatch-inc-1115 cause-resolved(dispatch-leak-415, checked-by=dispatch-fault-injection-515).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-19"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-19", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-20-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1116; harm check dispatch-probe-316; observation time 2026-09-15T04:08Z; suspected fault dispatch-lock-416; post-change test dispatch-replay-516; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1116 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-316 at 2026-09-15T04:08Z. Separately, the dispatch-lock-416 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-replay-516 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1116; harm check dispatch-probe-316; observation time 2026-09-15T04:08Z; suspected fault dispatch-lock-416; post-change test dispatch-replay-516; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1116 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-316@2026-09-15T04:08Z). dispatch-inc-1116 cause-resolved(dispatch-lock-416, checked-by=dispatch-replay-516).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-20"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-20", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-20-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1116; harm check dispatch-probe-316; observation time 2026-09-15T04:08Z; suspected fault dispatch-lock-416; post-change test dispatch-replay-516; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1116 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-316 at 2026-09-15T04:08Z. Separately, the dispatch-lock-416 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-replay-516 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1116; harm check dispatch-probe-316; observation time 2026-09-15T04:08Z; suspected fault dispatch-lock-416; post-change test dispatch-replay-516; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1116 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-316@2026-09-15T04:08Z). dispatch-inc-1116 cause-resolved(dispatch-lock-416, checked-by=dispatch-replay-516).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-20"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-20", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-21-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1117; harm check dispatch-probe-317; observation time 2026-09-16T09:21Z; suspected fault dispatch-quota-417; post-change test dispatch-soak-517; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1117 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-317 at 2026-09-16T09:21Z. Separately, the dispatch-quota-417 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-soak-517 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1117; harm check dispatch-probe-317; observation time 2026-09-16T09:21Z; suspected fault dispatch-quota-417; post-change test dispatch-soak-517; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1117 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-317@2026-09-16T09:21Z). dispatch-inc-1117 cause-resolved(dispatch-quota-417, checked-by=dispatch-soak-517).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-21"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-21", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-21-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1117; harm check dispatch-probe-317; observation time 2026-09-16T09:21Z; suspected fault dispatch-quota-417; post-change test dispatch-soak-517; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1117 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-317 at 2026-09-16T09:21Z. Separately, the dispatch-quota-417 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-soak-517 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1117; harm check dispatch-probe-317; observation time 2026-09-16T09:21Z; suspected fault dispatch-quota-417; post-change test dispatch-soak-517; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1117 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-317@2026-09-16T09:21Z). dispatch-inc-1117 cause-resolved(dispatch-quota-417, checked-by=dispatch-soak-517).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-21"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-21", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-22-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1118; harm check dispatch-probe-318; observation time 2026-09-17T14:34Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-418; post-change test dispatch-drill-518; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1118 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-318 at 2026-09-17T14:34Z. Separately, the dispatch-backlog-418 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-drill-518 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1118; harm check dispatch-probe-318; observation time 2026-09-17T14:34Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-418; post-change test dispatch-drill-518; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1118 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-318@2026-09-17T14:34Z). dispatch-inc-1118 cause-resolved(dispatch-backlog-418, checked-by=dispatch-drill-518).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-22"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-22", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-22-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1118; harm check dispatch-probe-318; observation time 2026-09-17T14:34Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-418; post-change test dispatch-drill-518; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1118 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-318 at 2026-09-17T14:34Z. Separately, the dispatch-backlog-418 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-drill-518 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1118; harm check dispatch-probe-318; observation time 2026-09-17T14:34Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-418; post-change test dispatch-drill-518; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1118 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-318@2026-09-17T14:34Z). dispatch-inc-1118 cause-resolved(dispatch-backlog-418, checked-by=dispatch-drill-518).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-22"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-22", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-23-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1119; harm check dispatch-probe-319; observation time 2026-09-18T19:47Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-419; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-519; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1119 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-319 at 2026-09-18T19:47Z. Separately, the dispatch-stall-419 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-fault-injection-519 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1119; harm check dispatch-probe-319; observation time 2026-09-18T19:47Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-419; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-519; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1119 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-319@2026-09-18T19:47Z). dispatch-inc-1119 cause-resolved(dispatch-stall-419, checked-by=dispatch-fault-injection-519).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-23"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-23", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-23-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1119; harm check dispatch-probe-319; observation time 2026-09-18T19:47Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-419; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-519; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named dispatch-inc-1119 impact was absent under dispatch-probe-319 at 2026-09-18T19:47Z. Separately, the dispatch-stall-419 cause was removed and the post-change dispatch-fault-injection-519 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1119; harm check dispatch-probe-319; observation time 2026-09-18T19:47Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-419; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-519; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1119 impact-recovered(dispatch-probe-319@2026-09-18T19:47Z). dispatch-inc-1119 cause-resolved(dispatch-stall-419, checked-by=dispatch-fault-injection-519).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-23"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-23", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-24-003", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1120; harm check storage-probe-320; observation time 2026-09-11T00:00Z; suspected fault storage-race-420; post-change test storage-replay-520; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1120 impact was absent under storage-probe-320 at 2026-09-11T00:00Z. Separately, the storage-race-420 cause was removed and the post-change storage-replay-520 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1120; harm check storage-probe-320; observation time 2026-09-11T00:00Z; suspected fault storage-race-420; post-change test storage-replay-520; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1120 impact-recovered(storage-probe-320@2026-09-11T00:00Z). storage-inc-1120 cause-resolved(storage-race-420, checked-by=storage-replay-520).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-24"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-24", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-24-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1120; harm check storage-probe-320; observation time 2026-09-11T00:00Z; suspected fault storage-race-420; post-change test storage-replay-520; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1120 impact was absent under storage-probe-320 at 2026-09-11T00:00Z. Separately, the storage-race-420 cause was removed and the post-change storage-replay-520 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1120; harm check storage-probe-320; observation time 2026-09-11T00:00Z; suspected fault storage-race-420; post-change test storage-replay-520; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1120 impact-recovered(storage-probe-320@2026-09-11T00:00Z). storage-inc-1120 cause-resolved(storage-race-420, checked-by=storage-replay-520).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-24"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-24", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-25-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1121; harm check storage-probe-321; observation time 2026-09-12T05:13Z; suspected fault storage-leak-421; post-change test storage-soak-521; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1121 impact was absent under storage-probe-321 at 2026-09-12T05:13Z. Separately, the storage-leak-421 cause was removed and the post-change storage-soak-521 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1121; harm check storage-probe-321; observation time 2026-09-12T05:13Z; suspected fault storage-leak-421; post-change test storage-soak-521; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1121 impact-recovered(storage-probe-321@2026-09-12T05:13Z). storage-inc-1121 cause-resolved(storage-leak-421, checked-by=storage-soak-521).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-25"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-25", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-25-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1121; harm check storage-probe-321; observation time 2026-09-12T05:13Z; suspected fault storage-leak-421; post-change test storage-soak-521; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1121 impact was absent under storage-probe-321 at 2026-09-12T05:13Z. Separately, the storage-leak-421 cause was removed and the post-change storage-soak-521 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1121; harm check storage-probe-321; observation time 2026-09-12T05:13Z; suspected fault storage-leak-421; post-change test storage-soak-521; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1121 impact-recovered(storage-probe-321@2026-09-12T05:13Z). storage-inc-1121 cause-resolved(storage-leak-421, checked-by=storage-soak-521).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-25"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-25", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-26-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1122; harm check storage-probe-322; observation time 2026-09-13T10:26Z; suspected fault storage-lock-422; post-change test storage-drill-522; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1122 impact was absent under storage-probe-322 at 2026-09-13T10:26Z. Separately, the storage-lock-422 cause was removed and the post-change storage-drill-522 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1122; harm check storage-probe-322; observation time 2026-09-13T10:26Z; suspected fault storage-lock-422; post-change test storage-drill-522; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1122 impact-recovered(storage-probe-322@2026-09-13T10:26Z). storage-inc-1122 cause-resolved(storage-lock-422, checked-by=storage-drill-522).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-26"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-26", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-26-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1122; harm check storage-probe-322; observation time 2026-09-13T10:26Z; suspected fault storage-lock-422; post-change test storage-drill-522; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1122 impact was absent under storage-probe-322 at 2026-09-13T10:26Z. Separately, the storage-lock-422 cause was removed and the post-change storage-drill-522 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1122; harm check storage-probe-322; observation time 2026-09-13T10:26Z; suspected fault storage-lock-422; post-change test storage-drill-522; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1122 impact-recovered(storage-probe-322@2026-09-13T10:26Z). storage-inc-1122 cause-resolved(storage-lock-422, checked-by=storage-drill-522).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-26"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-26", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-27-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1123; harm check storage-probe-323; observation time 2026-09-14T15:39Z; suspected fault storage-quota-423; post-change test storage-fault-injection-523; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1123 impact was absent under storage-probe-323 at 2026-09-14T15:39Z. Separately, the storage-quota-423 cause was removed and the post-change storage-fault-injection-523 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1123; harm check storage-probe-323; observation time 2026-09-14T15:39Z; suspected fault storage-quota-423; post-change test storage-fault-injection-523; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1123 impact-recovered(storage-probe-323@2026-09-14T15:39Z). storage-inc-1123 cause-resolved(storage-quota-423, checked-by=storage-fault-injection-523).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-27"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-27", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-27-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1123; harm check storage-probe-323; observation time 2026-09-14T15:39Z; suspected fault storage-quota-423; post-change test storage-fault-injection-523; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1123 impact was absent under storage-probe-323 at 2026-09-14T15:39Z. Separately, the storage-quota-423 cause was removed and the post-change storage-fault-injection-523 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1123; harm check storage-probe-323; observation time 2026-09-14T15:39Z; suspected fault storage-quota-423; post-change test storage-fault-injection-523; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1123 impact-recovered(storage-probe-323@2026-09-14T15:39Z). storage-inc-1123 cause-resolved(storage-quota-423, checked-by=storage-fault-injection-523).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-27"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-27", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-28-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1124; harm check storage-probe-324; observation time 2026-09-15T20:52Z; suspected fault storage-backlog-424; post-change test storage-replay-524; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1124 impact was absent under storage-probe-324 at 2026-09-15T20:52Z. Separately, the storage-backlog-424 cause was removed and the post-change storage-replay-524 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1124; harm check storage-probe-324; observation time 2026-09-15T20:52Z; suspected fault storage-backlog-424; post-change test storage-replay-524; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1124 impact-recovered(storage-probe-324@2026-09-15T20:52Z). storage-inc-1124 cause-resolved(storage-backlog-424, checked-by=storage-replay-524).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-28"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-28", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-28-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1124; harm check storage-probe-324; observation time 2026-09-15T20:52Z; suspected fault storage-backlog-424; post-change test storage-replay-524; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1124 impact was absent under storage-probe-324 at 2026-09-15T20:52Z. Separately, the storage-backlog-424 cause was removed and the post-change storage-replay-524 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1124; harm check storage-probe-324; observation time 2026-09-15T20:52Z; suspected fault storage-backlog-424; post-change test storage-replay-524; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1124 impact-recovered(storage-probe-324@2026-09-15T20:52Z). storage-inc-1124 cause-resolved(storage-backlog-424, checked-by=storage-replay-524).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-28"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-28", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-29-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1125; harm check storage-probe-325; observation time 2026-09-16T01:05Z; suspected fault storage-stall-425; post-change test storage-soak-525; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1125 impact was absent under storage-probe-325 at 2026-09-16T01:05Z. Separately, the storage-stall-425 cause was removed and the post-change storage-soak-525 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1125; harm check storage-probe-325; observation time 2026-09-16T01:05Z; suspected fault storage-stall-425; post-change test storage-soak-525; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1125 impact-recovered(storage-probe-325@2026-09-16T01:05Z). storage-inc-1125 cause-resolved(storage-stall-425, checked-by=storage-soak-525).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-29"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-29", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-29-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1125; harm check storage-probe-325; observation time 2026-09-16T01:05Z; suspected fault storage-stall-425; post-change test storage-soak-525; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1125 impact was absent under storage-probe-325 at 2026-09-16T01:05Z. Separately, the storage-stall-425 cause was removed and the post-change storage-soak-525 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1125; harm check storage-probe-325; observation time 2026-09-16T01:05Z; suspected fault storage-stall-425; post-change test storage-soak-525; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1125 impact-recovered(storage-probe-325@2026-09-16T01:05Z). storage-inc-1125 cause-resolved(storage-stall-425, checked-by=storage-soak-525).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-29"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-29", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-30-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1126; harm check storage-probe-326; observation time 2026-09-17T06:18Z; suspected fault storage-race-426; post-change test storage-drill-526; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1126 impact was absent under storage-probe-326 at 2026-09-17T06:18Z. Separately, the storage-race-426 cause was removed and the post-change storage-drill-526 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1126; harm check storage-probe-326; observation time 2026-09-17T06:18Z; suspected fault storage-race-426; post-change test storage-drill-526; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1126 impact-recovered(storage-probe-326@2026-09-17T06:18Z). storage-inc-1126 cause-resolved(storage-race-426, checked-by=storage-drill-526).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-30"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-30", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-30-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1126; harm check storage-probe-326; observation time 2026-09-17T06:18Z; suspected fault storage-race-426; post-change test storage-drill-526; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1126 impact was absent under storage-probe-326 at 2026-09-17T06:18Z. Separately, the storage-race-426 cause was removed and the post-change storage-drill-526 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1126; harm check storage-probe-326; observation time 2026-09-17T06:18Z; suspected fault storage-race-426; post-change test storage-drill-526; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1126 impact-recovered(storage-probe-326@2026-09-17T06:18Z). storage-inc-1126 cause-resolved(storage-race-426, checked-by=storage-drill-526).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-30"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-30", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-31-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1127; harm check storage-probe-327; observation time 2026-09-18T11:31Z; suspected fault storage-leak-427; post-change test storage-fault-injection-527; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1127 impact was absent under storage-probe-327 at 2026-09-18T11:31Z. Separately, the storage-leak-427 cause was removed and the post-change storage-fault-injection-527 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1127; harm check storage-probe-327; observation time 2026-09-18T11:31Z; suspected fault storage-leak-427; post-change test storage-fault-injection-527; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1127 impact-recovered(storage-probe-327@2026-09-18T11:31Z). storage-inc-1127 cause-resolved(storage-leak-427, checked-by=storage-fault-injection-527).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-31"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-31", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-31-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1127; harm check storage-probe-327; observation time 2026-09-18T11:31Z; suspected fault storage-leak-427; post-change test storage-fault-injection-527; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named storage-inc-1127 impact was absent under storage-probe-327 at 2026-09-18T11:31Z. Separately, the storage-leak-427 cause was removed and the post-change storage-fault-injection-527 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1127; harm check storage-probe-327; observation time 2026-09-18T11:31Z; suspected fault storage-leak-427; post-change test storage-fault-injection-527; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1127 impact-recovered(storage-probe-327@2026-09-18T11:31Z). storage-inc-1127 cause-resolved(storage-leak-427, checked-by=storage-fault-injection-527).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-31"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-31", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-32-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1128; harm check provisioning-probe-328; observation time 2026-09-11T16:44Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-428; post-change test provisioning-replay-528; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1128 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-328 at 2026-09-11T16:44Z. Separately, the provisioning-lock-428 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-replay-528 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1128; harm check provisioning-probe-328; observation time 2026-09-11T16:44Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-428; post-change test provisioning-replay-528; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1128 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-328@2026-09-11T16:44Z). provisioning-inc-1128 cause-resolved(provisioning-lock-428, checked-by=provisioning-replay-528).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-32"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-32", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-32-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1128; harm check provisioning-probe-328; observation time 2026-09-11T16:44Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-428; post-change test provisioning-replay-528; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1128 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-328 at 2026-09-11T16:44Z. Separately, the provisioning-lock-428 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-replay-528 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1128; harm check provisioning-probe-328; observation time 2026-09-11T16:44Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-428; post-change test provisioning-replay-528; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1128 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-328@2026-09-11T16:44Z). provisioning-inc-1128 cause-resolved(provisioning-lock-428, checked-by=provisioning-replay-528).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-32"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-32", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-33-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1129; harm check provisioning-probe-329; observation time 2026-09-12T21:57Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-429; post-change test provisioning-soak-529; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1129 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-329 at 2026-09-12T21:57Z. Separately, the provisioning-quota-429 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-soak-529 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1129; harm check provisioning-probe-329; observation time 2026-09-12T21:57Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-429; post-change test provisioning-soak-529; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1129 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-329@2026-09-12T21:57Z). provisioning-inc-1129 cause-resolved(provisioning-quota-429, checked-by=provisioning-soak-529).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-33"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-33", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-33-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1129; harm check provisioning-probe-329; observation time 2026-09-12T21:57Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-429; post-change test provisioning-soak-529; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1129 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-329 at 2026-09-12T21:57Z. Separately, the provisioning-quota-429 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-soak-529 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1129; harm check provisioning-probe-329; observation time 2026-09-12T21:57Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-429; post-change test provisioning-soak-529; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1129 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-329@2026-09-12T21:57Z). provisioning-inc-1129 cause-resolved(provisioning-quota-429, checked-by=provisioning-soak-529).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-33"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-33", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-34-003", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1130; harm check provisioning-probe-330; observation time 2026-09-13T02:10Z; suspected fault provisioning-backlog-430; post-change test provisioning-drill-530; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1130 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-330 at 2026-09-13T02:10Z. Separately, the provisioning-backlog-430 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-drill-530 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1130; harm check provisioning-probe-330; observation time 2026-09-13T02:10Z; suspected fault provisioning-backlog-430; post-change test provisioning-drill-530; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1130 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-330@2026-09-13T02:10Z). provisioning-inc-1130 cause-resolved(provisioning-backlog-430, checked-by=provisioning-drill-530).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-34"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-34", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-34-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1130; harm check provisioning-probe-330; observation time 2026-09-13T02:10Z; suspected fault provisioning-backlog-430; post-change test provisioning-drill-530; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1130 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-330 at 2026-09-13T02:10Z. Separately, the provisioning-backlog-430 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-drill-530 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1130; harm check provisioning-probe-330; observation time 2026-09-13T02:10Z; suspected fault provisioning-backlog-430; post-change test provisioning-drill-530; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1130 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-330@2026-09-13T02:10Z). provisioning-inc-1130 cause-resolved(provisioning-backlog-430, checked-by=provisioning-drill-530).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-34"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-34", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-35-005", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1131; harm check provisioning-probe-331; observation time 2026-09-14T07:23Z; suspected fault provisioning-stall-431; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-531; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1131 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-331 at 2026-09-14T07:23Z. Separately, the provisioning-stall-431 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-fault-injection-531 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1131; harm check provisioning-probe-331; observation time 2026-09-14T07:23Z; suspected fault provisioning-stall-431; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-531; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1131 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-331@2026-09-14T07:23Z). provisioning-inc-1131 cause-resolved(provisioning-stall-431, checked-by=provisioning-fault-injection-531).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "both of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-35"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-35", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-35-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1131; harm check provisioning-probe-331; observation time 2026-09-14T07:23Z; suspected fault provisioning-stall-431; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-531; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1131 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-331 at 2026-09-14T07:23Z. Separately, the provisioning-stall-431 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-fault-injection-531 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1131; harm check provisioning-probe-331; observation time 2026-09-14T07:23Z; suspected fault provisioning-stall-431; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-531; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1131 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-331@2026-09-14T07:23Z). provisioning-inc-1131 cause-resolved(provisioning-stall-431, checked-by=provisioning-fault-injection-531).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-35"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-35", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-36-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1132; harm check provisioning-probe-332; observation time 2026-09-15T12:36Z; suspected fault provisioning-race-432; post-change test provisioning-replay-532; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1132 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-332 at 2026-09-15T12:36Z. Separately, the provisioning-race-432 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-replay-532 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1132; harm check provisioning-probe-332; observation time 2026-09-15T12:36Z; suspected fault provisioning-race-432; post-change test provisioning-replay-532; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1132 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-332@2026-09-15T12:36Z). provisioning-inc-1132 cause-resolved(provisioning-race-432, checked-by=provisioning-replay-532).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-36"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-36", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-36-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1132; harm check provisioning-probe-332; observation time 2026-09-15T12:36Z; suspected fault provisioning-race-432; post-change test provisioning-replay-532; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1132 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-332 at 2026-09-15T12:36Z. Separately, the provisioning-race-432 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-replay-532 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1132; harm check provisioning-probe-332; observation time 2026-09-15T12:36Z; suspected fault provisioning-race-432; post-change test provisioning-replay-532; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1132 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-332@2026-09-15T12:36Z). provisioning-inc-1132 cause-resolved(provisioning-race-432, checked-by=provisioning-replay-532).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-36"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-36", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-37-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1133; harm check provisioning-probe-333; observation time 2026-09-16T17:49Z; suspected fault provisioning-leak-433; post-change test provisioning-soak-533; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1133 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-333 at 2026-09-16T17:49Z. Separately, the provisioning-leak-433 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-soak-533 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1133; harm check provisioning-probe-333; observation time 2026-09-16T17:49Z; suspected fault provisioning-leak-433; post-change test provisioning-soak-533; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1133 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-333@2026-09-16T17:49Z). provisioning-inc-1133 cause-resolved(provisioning-leak-433, checked-by=provisioning-soak-533).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-37"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-37", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-37-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1133; harm check provisioning-probe-333; observation time 2026-09-16T17:49Z; suspected fault provisioning-leak-433; post-change test provisioning-soak-533; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1133 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-333 at 2026-09-16T17:49Z. Separately, the provisioning-leak-433 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-soak-533 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1133; harm check provisioning-probe-333; observation time 2026-09-16T17:49Z; suspected fault provisioning-leak-433; post-change test provisioning-soak-533; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1133 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-333@2026-09-16T17:49Z). provisioning-inc-1133 cause-resolved(provisioning-leak-433, checked-by=provisioning-soak-533).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-37"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-37", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-38-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1134; harm check provisioning-probe-334; observation time 2026-09-17T22:02Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-434; post-change test provisioning-drill-534; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1134 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-334 at 2026-09-17T22:02Z. Separately, the provisioning-lock-434 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-drill-534 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1134; harm check provisioning-probe-334; observation time 2026-09-17T22:02Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-434; post-change test provisioning-drill-534; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1134 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-334@2026-09-17T22:02Z). provisioning-inc-1134 cause-resolved(provisioning-lock-434, checked-by=provisioning-drill-534).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-38"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-38", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-38-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1134; harm check provisioning-probe-334; observation time 2026-09-17T22:02Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-434; post-change test provisioning-drill-534; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1134 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-334 at 2026-09-17T22:02Z. Separately, the provisioning-lock-434 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-drill-534 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1134; harm check provisioning-probe-334; observation time 2026-09-17T22:02Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-434; post-change test provisioning-drill-534; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1134 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-334@2026-09-17T22:02Z). provisioning-inc-1134 cause-resolved(provisioning-lock-434, checked-by=provisioning-drill-534).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-38"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-38", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-39-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1135; harm check provisioning-probe-335; observation time 2026-09-18T03:15Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-435; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-535; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1135 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-335 at 2026-09-18T03:15Z. Separately, the provisioning-quota-435 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-fault-injection-535 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1135; harm check provisioning-probe-335; observation time 2026-09-18T03:15Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-435; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-535; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1135 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-335@2026-09-18T03:15Z). provisioning-inc-1135 cause-resolved(provisioning-quota-435, checked-by=provisioning-fault-injection-535).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-39"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-39", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-39-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1135; harm check provisioning-probe-335; observation time 2026-09-18T03:15Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-435; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-535; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named provisioning-inc-1135 impact was absent under provisioning-probe-335 at 2026-09-18T03:15Z. Separately, the provisioning-quota-435 cause was removed and the post-change provisioning-fault-injection-535 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1135; harm check provisioning-probe-335; observation time 2026-09-18T03:15Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-435; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-535; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1135 impact-recovered(provisioning-probe-335@2026-09-18T03:15Z). provisioning-inc-1135 cause-resolved(provisioning-quota-435, checked-by=provisioning-fault-injection-535).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-39"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-39", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-40-004", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1136; harm check notifications-probe-336; observation time 2026-09-11T08:28Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-436; post-change test notifications-replay-536; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1136 impact was absent under notifications-probe-336 at 2026-09-11T08:28Z. Separately, the notifications-backlog-436 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-replay-536 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1136; harm check notifications-probe-336; observation time 2026-09-11T08:28Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-436; post-change test notifications-replay-536; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1136 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-336@2026-09-11T08:28Z). notifications-inc-1136 cause-resolved(notifications-backlog-436, checked-by=notifications-replay-536).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-40"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-40", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-40-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1136; harm check notifications-probe-336; observation time 2026-09-11T08:28Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-436; post-change test notifications-replay-536; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1136 impact was absent under notifications-probe-336 at 2026-09-11T08:28Z. Separately, the notifications-backlog-436 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-replay-536 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1136; harm check notifications-probe-336; observation time 2026-09-11T08:28Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-436; post-change test notifications-replay-536; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1136 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-336@2026-09-11T08:28Z). notifications-inc-1136 cause-resolved(notifications-backlog-436, checked-by=notifications-replay-536).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-40"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-40", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-41-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1137; harm check notifications-probe-337; observation time 2026-09-12T13:41Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-437; post-change test notifications-soak-537; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1137 impact was absent under notifications-probe-337 at 2026-09-12T13:41Z. Separately, the notifications-stall-437 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-soak-537 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1137; harm check notifications-probe-337; observation time 2026-09-12T13:41Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-437; post-change test notifications-soak-537; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1137 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-337@2026-09-12T13:41Z). notifications-inc-1137 cause-resolved(notifications-stall-437, checked-by=notifications-soak-537).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "neither of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-41"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-41", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-41-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1137; harm check notifications-probe-337; observation time 2026-09-12T13:41Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-437; post-change test notifications-soak-537; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1137 impact was absent under notifications-probe-337 at 2026-09-12T13:41Z. Separately, the notifications-stall-437 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-soak-537 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1137; harm check notifications-probe-337; observation time 2026-09-12T13:41Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-437; post-change test notifications-soak-537; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1137 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-337@2026-09-12T13:41Z). notifications-inc-1137 cause-resolved(notifications-stall-437, checked-by=notifications-soak-537).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-41"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-41", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-42-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1138; harm check notifications-probe-338; observation time 2026-09-13T18:54Z; suspected fault notifications-race-438; post-change test notifications-drill-538; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1138 impact was absent under notifications-probe-338 at 2026-09-13T18:54Z. Separately, the notifications-race-438 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-drill-538 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1138; harm check notifications-probe-338; observation time 2026-09-13T18:54Z; suspected fault notifications-race-438; post-change test notifications-drill-538; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1138 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-338@2026-09-13T18:54Z). notifications-inc-1138 cause-resolved(notifications-race-438, checked-by=notifications-drill-538).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "both of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-42"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-42", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-42-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1138; harm check notifications-probe-338; observation time 2026-09-13T18:54Z; suspected fault notifications-race-438; post-change test notifications-drill-538; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1138 impact was absent under notifications-probe-338 at 2026-09-13T18:54Z. Separately, the notifications-race-438 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-drill-538 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1138; harm check notifications-probe-338; observation time 2026-09-13T18:54Z; suspected fault notifications-race-438; post-change test notifications-drill-538; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1138 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-338@2026-09-13T18:54Z). notifications-inc-1138 cause-resolved(notifications-race-438, checked-by=notifications-drill-538).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-42"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-42", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-43-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1139; harm check notifications-probe-339; observation time 2026-09-14T23:07Z; suspected fault notifications-leak-439; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-539; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1139 impact was absent under notifications-probe-339 at 2026-09-14T23:07Z. Separately, the notifications-leak-439 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-fault-injection-539 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1139; harm check notifications-probe-339; observation time 2026-09-14T23:07Z; suspected fault notifications-leak-439; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-539; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1139 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-339@2026-09-14T23:07Z). notifications-inc-1139 cause-resolved(notifications-leak-439, checked-by=notifications-fault-injection-539).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "neither of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-43"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-43", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-43-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1139; harm check notifications-probe-339; observation time 2026-09-14T23:07Z; suspected fault notifications-leak-439; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-539; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1139 impact was absent under notifications-probe-339 at 2026-09-14T23:07Z. Separately, the notifications-leak-439 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-fault-injection-539 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1139; harm check notifications-probe-339; observation time 2026-09-14T23:07Z; suspected fault notifications-leak-439; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-539; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1139 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-339@2026-09-14T23:07Z). notifications-inc-1139 cause-resolved(notifications-leak-439, checked-by=notifications-fault-injection-539).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-43"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-43", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-44-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1140; harm check notifications-probe-340; observation time 2026-09-15T04:20Z; suspected fault notifications-lock-440; post-change test notifications-replay-540; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1140 impact was absent under notifications-probe-340 at 2026-09-15T04:20Z. Separately, the notifications-lock-440 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-replay-540 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1140; harm check notifications-probe-340; observation time 2026-09-15T04:20Z; suspected fault notifications-lock-440; post-change test notifications-replay-540; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1140 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-340@2026-09-15T04:20Z). notifications-inc-1140 cause-resolved(notifications-lock-440, checked-by=notifications-replay-540).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "both of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-44"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-44", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-44-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1140; harm check notifications-probe-340; observation time 2026-09-15T04:20Z; suspected fault notifications-lock-440; post-change test notifications-replay-540; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1140 impact was absent under notifications-probe-340 at 2026-09-15T04:20Z. Separately, the notifications-lock-440 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-replay-540 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1140; harm check notifications-probe-340; observation time 2026-09-15T04:20Z; suspected fault notifications-lock-440; post-change test notifications-replay-540; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1140 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-340@2026-09-15T04:20Z). notifications-inc-1140 cause-resolved(notifications-lock-440, checked-by=notifications-replay-540).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-44"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-44", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-45-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1141; harm check notifications-probe-341; observation time 2026-09-16T09:33Z; suspected fault notifications-quota-441; post-change test notifications-soak-541; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1141 impact was absent under notifications-probe-341 at 2026-09-16T09:33Z. Separately, the notifications-quota-441 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-soak-541 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1141; harm check notifications-probe-341; observation time 2026-09-16T09:33Z; suspected fault notifications-quota-441; post-change test notifications-soak-541; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1141 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-341@2026-09-16T09:33Z). notifications-inc-1141 cause-resolved(notifications-quota-441, checked-by=notifications-soak-541).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-45"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-45", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-45-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1141; harm check notifications-probe-341; observation time 2026-09-16T09:33Z; suspected fault notifications-quota-441; post-change test notifications-soak-541; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1141 impact was absent under notifications-probe-341 at 2026-09-16T09:33Z. Separately, the notifications-quota-441 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-soak-541 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1141; harm check notifications-probe-341; observation time 2026-09-16T09:33Z; suspected fault notifications-quota-441; post-change test notifications-soak-541; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1141 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-341@2026-09-16T09:33Z). notifications-inc-1141 cause-resolved(notifications-quota-441, checked-by=notifications-soak-541).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-45"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-45", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-46-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1142; harm check notifications-probe-342; observation time 2026-09-17T14:46Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-442; post-change test notifications-drill-542; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1142 impact was absent under notifications-probe-342 at 2026-09-17T14:46Z. Separately, the notifications-backlog-442 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-drill-542 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1142; harm check notifications-probe-342; observation time 2026-09-17T14:46Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-442; post-change test notifications-drill-542; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1142 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-342@2026-09-17T14:46Z). notifications-inc-1142 cause-resolved(notifications-backlog-442, checked-by=notifications-drill-542).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-46"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-46", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-46-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1142; harm check notifications-probe-342; observation time 2026-09-17T14:46Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-442; post-change test notifications-drill-542; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1142 impact was absent under notifications-probe-342 at 2026-09-17T14:46Z. Separately, the notifications-backlog-442 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-drill-542 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1142; harm check notifications-probe-342; observation time 2026-09-17T14:46Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-442; post-change test notifications-drill-542; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1142 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-342@2026-09-17T14:46Z). notifications-inc-1142 cause-resolved(notifications-backlog-442, checked-by=notifications-drill-542).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-46"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-46", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-ass-47-004", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1143; harm check notifications-probe-343; observation time 2026-09-18T19:59Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-443; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-543; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1143 impact was absent under notifications-probe-343 at 2026-09-18T19:59Z. Separately, the notifications-stall-443 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-fault-injection-543 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1143; harm check notifications-probe-343; observation time 2026-09-18T19:59Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-443; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-543; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1143 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-343@2026-09-18T19:59Z). notifications-inc-1143 cause-resolved(notifications-stall-443, checked-by=notifications-fault-injection-543).", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those"], "answer": "both of those", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-47"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-47", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-both-claims-rou-47-003", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1143; harm check notifications-probe-343; observation time 2026-09-18T19:59Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-443; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-543; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: The named notifications-inc-1143 impact was absent under notifications-probe-343 at 2026-09-18T19:59Z. Separately, the notifications-stall-443 cause was removed and the post-change notifications-fault-injection-543 test passed.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1143; harm check notifications-probe-343; observation time 2026-09-18T19:59Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-443; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-543; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1143 impact-recovered(notifications-probe-343@2026-09-18T19:59Z). notifications-inc-1143 cause-resolved(notifications-stall-443, checked-by=notifications-fault-injection-543).", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "both workstreams may close", "settlement_stratum": "both-claims::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "both-claims", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-47"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-both-claims-47", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "both-claims"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-00-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1144; harm check ingest-probe-344; observation time 2026-09-11T00:12Z; suspected fault ingest-race-444; post-change test ingest-replay-544; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for ingest-inc-1144; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1144; harm check ingest-probe-344; observation time 2026-09-11T00:12Z; suspected fault ingest-race-444; post-change test ingest-replay-544; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1144 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-00"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-00", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-00-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1144; harm check ingest-probe-344; observation time 2026-09-11T00:12Z; suspected fault ingest-race-444; post-change test ingest-replay-544; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for ingest-inc-1144; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1144; harm check ingest-probe-344; observation time 2026-09-11T00:12Z; suspected fault ingest-race-444; post-change test ingest-replay-544; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1144 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-00"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-00", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-01-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1145; harm check ingest-probe-345; observation time 2026-09-12T05:25Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-445; post-change test ingest-soak-545; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for ingest-inc-1145; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1145; harm check ingest-probe-345; observation time 2026-09-12T05:25Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-445; post-change test ingest-soak-545; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1145 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-01"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-01", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-01-003", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1145; harm check ingest-probe-345; observation time 2026-09-12T05:25Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-445; post-change test ingest-soak-545; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for ingest-inc-1145; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1145; harm check ingest-probe-345; observation time 2026-09-12T05:25Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-445; post-change test ingest-soak-545; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1145 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-01"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-01", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-02-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1146; harm check ingest-probe-346; observation time 2026-09-13T10:38Z; suspected fault ingest-lock-446; post-change test ingest-drill-546; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for ingest-inc-1146; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1146; harm check ingest-probe-346; observation time 2026-09-13T10:38Z; suspected fault ingest-lock-446; post-change test ingest-drill-546; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1146 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-02"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-02", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-02-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1146; harm check ingest-probe-346; observation time 2026-09-13T10:38Z; suspected fault ingest-lock-446; post-change test ingest-drill-546; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for ingest-inc-1146; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1146; harm check ingest-probe-346; observation time 2026-09-13T10:38Z; suspected fault ingest-lock-446; post-change test ingest-drill-546; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1146 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-02"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-02", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-03-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1147; harm check ingest-probe-347; observation time 2026-09-14T15:51Z; suspected fault ingest-quota-447; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-547; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for ingest-inc-1147; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1147; harm check ingest-probe-347; observation time 2026-09-14T15:51Z; suspected fault ingest-quota-447; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-547; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1147 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-03"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-03", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-03-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1147; harm check ingest-probe-347; observation time 2026-09-14T15:51Z; suspected fault ingest-quota-447; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-547; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for ingest-inc-1147; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1147; harm check ingest-probe-347; observation time 2026-09-14T15:51Z; suspected fault ingest-quota-447; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-547; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1147 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-03"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-03", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-04-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1148; harm check ingest-probe-348; observation time 2026-09-15T20:04Z; suspected fault ingest-backlog-448; post-change test ingest-replay-548; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for ingest-inc-1148; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1148; harm check ingest-probe-348; observation time 2026-09-15T20:04Z; suspected fault ingest-backlog-448; post-change test ingest-replay-548; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1148 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-04"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-04", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-04-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1148; harm check ingest-probe-348; observation time 2026-09-15T20:04Z; suspected fault ingest-backlog-448; post-change test ingest-replay-548; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for ingest-inc-1148; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1148; harm check ingest-probe-348; observation time 2026-09-15T20:04Z; suspected fault ingest-backlog-448; post-change test ingest-replay-548; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1148 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-04"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-04", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-05-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1149; harm check ingest-probe-349; observation time 2026-09-16T01:17Z; suspected fault ingest-stall-449; post-change test ingest-soak-549; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for ingest-inc-1149; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1149; harm check ingest-probe-349; observation time 2026-09-16T01:17Z; suspected fault ingest-stall-449; post-change test ingest-soak-549; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1149 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-05"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-05", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-05-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1149; harm check ingest-probe-349; observation time 2026-09-16T01:17Z; suspected fault ingest-stall-449; post-change test ingest-soak-549; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for ingest-inc-1149; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1149; harm check ingest-probe-349; observation time 2026-09-16T01:17Z; suspected fault ingest-stall-449; post-change test ingest-soak-549; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1149 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-05"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-05", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-06-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1150; harm check ingest-probe-350; observation time 2026-09-17T06:30Z; suspected fault ingest-race-450; post-change test ingest-drill-550; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for ingest-inc-1150; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1150; harm check ingest-probe-350; observation time 2026-09-17T06:30Z; suspected fault ingest-race-450; post-change test ingest-drill-550; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1150 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-06"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-06", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-06-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1150; harm check ingest-probe-350; observation time 2026-09-17T06:30Z; suspected fault ingest-race-450; post-change test ingest-drill-550; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for ingest-inc-1150; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1150; harm check ingest-probe-350; observation time 2026-09-17T06:30Z; suspected fault ingest-race-450; post-change test ingest-drill-550; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1150 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-06"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-06", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-07-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1151; harm check ingest-probe-351; observation time 2026-09-18T11:43Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-451; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-551; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for ingest-inc-1151; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1151; harm check ingest-probe-351; observation time 2026-09-18T11:43Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-451; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-551; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1151 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "neither of those"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-07"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-07", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-07-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1151; harm check ingest-probe-351; observation time 2026-09-18T11:43Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-451; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-551; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for ingest-inc-1151; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident ingest-inc-1151; harm check ingest-probe-351; observation time 2026-09-18T11:43Z; suspected fault ingest-leak-451; post-change test ingest-fault-injection-551; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: ingest-inc-1151 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-07"}, "domain": "ingest", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-07", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-08-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1152; harm check settlement-probe-352; observation time 2026-09-11T16:56Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-452; post-change test settlement-replay-552; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for settlement-inc-1152; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1152; harm check settlement-probe-352; observation time 2026-09-11T16:56Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-452; post-change test settlement-replay-552; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1152 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-08"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-08", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-08-005", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1152; harm check settlement-probe-352; observation time 2026-09-11T16:56Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-452; post-change test settlement-replay-552; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for settlement-inc-1152; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1152; harm check settlement-probe-352; observation time 2026-09-11T16:56Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-452; post-change test settlement-replay-552; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1152 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-08"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-08", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-09-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1153; harm check settlement-probe-353; observation time 2026-09-12T21:09Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-453; post-change test settlement-soak-553; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for settlement-inc-1153; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1153; harm check settlement-probe-353; observation time 2026-09-12T21:09Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-453; post-change test settlement-soak-553; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1153 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-09"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-09", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-09-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1153; harm check settlement-probe-353; observation time 2026-09-12T21:09Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-453; post-change test settlement-soak-553; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for settlement-inc-1153; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1153; harm check settlement-probe-353; observation time 2026-09-12T21:09Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-453; post-change test settlement-soak-553; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1153 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-09"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-09", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-10-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1154; harm check settlement-probe-354; observation time 2026-09-13T02:22Z; suspected fault settlement-backlog-454; post-change test settlement-drill-554; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for settlement-inc-1154; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1154; harm check settlement-probe-354; observation time 2026-09-13T02:22Z; suspected fault settlement-backlog-454; post-change test settlement-drill-554; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1154 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-10"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-10", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-10-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1154; harm check settlement-probe-354; observation time 2026-09-13T02:22Z; suspected fault settlement-backlog-454; post-change test settlement-drill-554; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for settlement-inc-1154; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1154; harm check settlement-probe-354; observation time 2026-09-13T02:22Z; suspected fault settlement-backlog-454; post-change test settlement-drill-554; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1154 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-10"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-10", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-11-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1155; harm check settlement-probe-355; observation time 2026-09-14T07:35Z; suspected fault settlement-stall-455; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-555; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for settlement-inc-1155; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1155; harm check settlement-probe-355; observation time 2026-09-14T07:35Z; suspected fault settlement-stall-455; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-555; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1155 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "neither of those"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-11"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-11", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-11-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1155; harm check settlement-probe-355; observation time 2026-09-14T07:35Z; suspected fault settlement-stall-455; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-555; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for settlement-inc-1155; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1155; harm check settlement-probe-355; observation time 2026-09-14T07:35Z; suspected fault settlement-stall-455; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-555; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1155 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-11"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-11", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-12-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1156; harm check settlement-probe-356; observation time 2026-09-15T12:48Z; suspected fault settlement-race-456; post-change test settlement-replay-556; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for settlement-inc-1156; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1156; harm check settlement-probe-356; observation time 2026-09-15T12:48Z; suspected fault settlement-race-456; post-change test settlement-replay-556; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1156 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "neither of those"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-12"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-12", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-12-003", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1156; harm check settlement-probe-356; observation time 2026-09-15T12:48Z; suspected fault settlement-race-456; post-change test settlement-replay-556; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for settlement-inc-1156; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1156; harm check settlement-probe-356; observation time 2026-09-15T12:48Z; suspected fault settlement-race-456; post-change test settlement-replay-556; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1156 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-12"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-12", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-13-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1157; harm check settlement-probe-357; observation time 2026-09-16T17:01Z; suspected fault settlement-leak-457; post-change test settlement-soak-557; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for settlement-inc-1157; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1157; harm check settlement-probe-357; observation time 2026-09-16T17:01Z; suspected fault settlement-leak-457; post-change test settlement-soak-557; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1157 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-13"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-13", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-13-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1157; harm check settlement-probe-357; observation time 2026-09-16T17:01Z; suspected fault settlement-leak-457; post-change test settlement-soak-557; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for settlement-inc-1157; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1157; harm check settlement-probe-357; observation time 2026-09-16T17:01Z; suspected fault settlement-leak-457; post-change test settlement-soak-557; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1157 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-13"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-13", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-14-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1158; harm check settlement-probe-358; observation time 2026-09-17T22:14Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-458; post-change test settlement-drill-558; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for settlement-inc-1158; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1158; harm check settlement-probe-358; observation time 2026-09-17T22:14Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-458; post-change test settlement-drill-558; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1158 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-14"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-14", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-14-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1158; harm check settlement-probe-358; observation time 2026-09-17T22:14Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-458; post-change test settlement-drill-558; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for settlement-inc-1158; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1158; harm check settlement-probe-358; observation time 2026-09-17T22:14Z; suspected fault settlement-lock-458; post-change test settlement-drill-558; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1158 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-14"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-14", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-15-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1159; harm check settlement-probe-359; observation time 2026-09-18T03:27Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-459; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-559; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for settlement-inc-1159; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1159; harm check settlement-probe-359; observation time 2026-09-18T03:27Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-459; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-559; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1159 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-15"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-15", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-15-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1159; harm check settlement-probe-359; observation time 2026-09-18T03:27Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-459; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-559; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for settlement-inc-1159; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident settlement-inc-1159; harm check settlement-probe-359; observation time 2026-09-18T03:27Z; suspected fault settlement-quota-459; post-change test settlement-fault-injection-559; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: settlement-inc-1159 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-15"}, "domain": "settlement", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-15", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-16-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1160; harm check dispatch-probe-360; observation time 2026-09-11T08:40Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-460; post-change test dispatch-replay-560; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for dispatch-inc-1160; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1160; harm check dispatch-probe-360; observation time 2026-09-11T08:40Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-460; post-change test dispatch-replay-560; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1160 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-16"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-16", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-16-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1160; harm check dispatch-probe-360; observation time 2026-09-11T08:40Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-460; post-change test dispatch-replay-560; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for dispatch-inc-1160; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1160; harm check dispatch-probe-360; observation time 2026-09-11T08:40Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-460; post-change test dispatch-replay-560; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1160 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-16"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-16", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-17-004", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1161; harm check dispatch-probe-361; observation time 2026-09-12T13:53Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-461; post-change test dispatch-soak-561; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for dispatch-inc-1161; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1161; harm check dispatch-probe-361; observation time 2026-09-12T13:53Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-461; post-change test dispatch-soak-561; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1161 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "neither of those"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-17"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-17", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-17-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1161; harm check dispatch-probe-361; observation time 2026-09-12T13:53Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-461; post-change test dispatch-soak-561; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for dispatch-inc-1161; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1161; harm check dispatch-probe-361; observation time 2026-09-12T13:53Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-461; post-change test dispatch-soak-561; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1161 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-17"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-17", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-18-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1162; harm check dispatch-probe-362; observation time 2026-09-13T18:06Z; suspected fault dispatch-race-462; post-change test dispatch-drill-562; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for dispatch-inc-1162; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1162; harm check dispatch-probe-362; observation time 2026-09-13T18:06Z; suspected fault dispatch-race-462; post-change test dispatch-drill-562; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1162 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-18"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-18", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-18-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1162; harm check dispatch-probe-362; observation time 2026-09-13T18:06Z; suspected fault dispatch-race-462; post-change test dispatch-drill-562; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for dispatch-inc-1162; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1162; harm check dispatch-probe-362; observation time 2026-09-13T18:06Z; suspected fault dispatch-race-462; post-change test dispatch-drill-562; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1162 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-18"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-18", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-19-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1163; harm check dispatch-probe-363; observation time 2026-09-14T23:19Z; suspected fault dispatch-leak-463; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-563; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for dispatch-inc-1163; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1163; harm check dispatch-probe-363; observation time 2026-09-14T23:19Z; suspected fault dispatch-leak-463; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-563; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1163 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-19"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-19", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-19-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1163; harm check dispatch-probe-363; observation time 2026-09-14T23:19Z; suspected fault dispatch-leak-463; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-563; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for dispatch-inc-1163; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1163; harm check dispatch-probe-363; observation time 2026-09-14T23:19Z; suspected fault dispatch-leak-463; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-563; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1163 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-19"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-19", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-20-004", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1164; harm check dispatch-probe-364; observation time 2026-09-15T04:32Z; suspected fault dispatch-lock-464; post-change test dispatch-replay-564; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for dispatch-inc-1164; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1164; harm check dispatch-probe-364; observation time 2026-09-15T04:32Z; suspected fault dispatch-lock-464; post-change test dispatch-replay-564; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1164 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-20"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-20", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-20-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1164; harm check dispatch-probe-364; observation time 2026-09-15T04:32Z; suspected fault dispatch-lock-464; post-change test dispatch-replay-564; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for dispatch-inc-1164; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1164; harm check dispatch-probe-364; observation time 2026-09-15T04:32Z; suspected fault dispatch-lock-464; post-change test dispatch-replay-564; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1164 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-20"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-20", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-21-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1165; harm check dispatch-probe-365; observation time 2026-09-16T09:45Z; suspected fault dispatch-quota-465; post-change test dispatch-soak-565; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for dispatch-inc-1165; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1165; harm check dispatch-probe-365; observation time 2026-09-16T09:45Z; suspected fault dispatch-quota-465; post-change test dispatch-soak-565; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1165 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-21"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-21", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-21-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1165; harm check dispatch-probe-365; observation time 2026-09-16T09:45Z; suspected fault dispatch-quota-465; post-change test dispatch-soak-565; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for dispatch-inc-1165; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1165; harm check dispatch-probe-365; observation time 2026-09-16T09:45Z; suspected fault dispatch-quota-465; post-change test dispatch-soak-565; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1165 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-21"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-21", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-22-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1166; harm check dispatch-probe-366; observation time 2026-09-17T14:58Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-466; post-change test dispatch-drill-566; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for dispatch-inc-1166; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1166; harm check dispatch-probe-366; observation time 2026-09-17T14:58Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-466; post-change test dispatch-drill-566; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1166 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-22"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-22", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-22-003", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1166; harm check dispatch-probe-366; observation time 2026-09-17T14:58Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-466; post-change test dispatch-drill-566; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for dispatch-inc-1166; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1166; harm check dispatch-probe-366; observation time 2026-09-17T14:58Z; suspected fault dispatch-backlog-466; post-change test dispatch-drill-566; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1166 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-22"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-22", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-23-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1167; harm check dispatch-probe-367; observation time 2026-09-18T19:11Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-467; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-567; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for dispatch-inc-1167; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1167; harm check dispatch-probe-367; observation time 2026-09-18T19:11Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-467; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-567; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1167 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-23"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-23", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-23-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1167; harm check dispatch-probe-367; observation time 2026-09-18T19:11Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-467; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-567; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for dispatch-inc-1167; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident dispatch-inc-1167; harm check dispatch-probe-367; observation time 2026-09-18T19:11Z; suspected fault dispatch-stall-467; post-change test dispatch-fault-injection-567; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: dispatch-inc-1167 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-23"}, "domain": "dispatch", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-23", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-24-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1168; harm check storage-probe-368; observation time 2026-09-11T00:24Z; suspected fault storage-race-468; post-change test storage-replay-568; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for storage-inc-1168; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1168; harm check storage-probe-368; observation time 2026-09-11T00:24Z; suspected fault storage-race-468; post-change test storage-replay-568; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1168 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-24"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-24", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-24-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1168; harm check storage-probe-368; observation time 2026-09-11T00:24Z; suspected fault storage-race-468; post-change test storage-replay-568; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for storage-inc-1168; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1168; harm check storage-probe-368; observation time 2026-09-11T00:24Z; suspected fault storage-race-468; post-change test storage-replay-568; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1168 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-24"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-24", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-25-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1169; harm check storage-probe-369; observation time 2026-09-12T05:37Z; suspected fault storage-leak-469; post-change test storage-soak-569; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for storage-inc-1169; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1169; harm check storage-probe-369; observation time 2026-09-12T05:37Z; suspected fault storage-leak-469; post-change test storage-soak-569; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1169 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-25"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-25", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-25-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1169; harm check storage-probe-369; observation time 2026-09-12T05:37Z; suspected fault storage-leak-469; post-change test storage-soak-569; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for storage-inc-1169; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1169; harm check storage-probe-369; observation time 2026-09-12T05:37Z; suspected fault storage-leak-469; post-change test storage-soak-569; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1169 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-25"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-25", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-26-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1170; harm check storage-probe-370; observation time 2026-09-13T10:50Z; suspected fault storage-lock-470; post-change test storage-drill-570; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for storage-inc-1170; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1170; harm check storage-probe-370; observation time 2026-09-13T10:50Z; suspected fault storage-lock-470; post-change test storage-drill-570; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1170 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-26"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-26", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-26-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1170; harm check storage-probe-370; observation time 2026-09-13T10:50Z; suspected fault storage-lock-470; post-change test storage-drill-570; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for storage-inc-1170; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1170; harm check storage-probe-370; observation time 2026-09-13T10:50Z; suspected fault storage-lock-470; post-change test storage-drill-570; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1170 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-26"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-26", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-27-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1171; harm check storage-probe-371; observation time 2026-09-14T15:03Z; suspected fault storage-quota-471; post-change test storage-fault-injection-571; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for storage-inc-1171; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1171; harm check storage-probe-371; observation time 2026-09-14T15:03Z; suspected fault storage-quota-471; post-change test storage-fault-injection-571; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1171 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-27"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-27", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-27-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1171; harm check storage-probe-371; observation time 2026-09-14T15:03Z; suspected fault storage-quota-471; post-change test storage-fault-injection-571; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for storage-inc-1171; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1171; harm check storage-probe-371; observation time 2026-09-14T15:03Z; suspected fault storage-quota-471; post-change test storage-fault-injection-571; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1171 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-27"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-27", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-28-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1172; harm check storage-probe-372; observation time 2026-09-15T20:16Z; suspected fault storage-backlog-472; post-change test storage-replay-572; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for storage-inc-1172; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1172; harm check storage-probe-372; observation time 2026-09-15T20:16Z; suspected fault storage-backlog-472; post-change test storage-replay-572; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1172 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-28"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-28", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-28-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1172; harm check storage-probe-372; observation time 2026-09-15T20:16Z; suspected fault storage-backlog-472; post-change test storage-replay-572; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for storage-inc-1172; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1172; harm check storage-probe-372; observation time 2026-09-15T20:16Z; suspected fault storage-backlog-472; post-change test storage-replay-572; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1172 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-28"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-28", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-29-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1173; harm check storage-probe-373; observation time 2026-09-16T01:29Z; suspected fault storage-stall-473; post-change test storage-soak-573; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for storage-inc-1173; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1173; harm check storage-probe-373; observation time 2026-09-16T01:29Z; suspected fault storage-stall-473; post-change test storage-soak-573; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1173 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-29"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-29", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-29-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1173; harm check storage-probe-373; observation time 2026-09-16T01:29Z; suspected fault storage-stall-473; post-change test storage-soak-573; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for storage-inc-1173; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1173; harm check storage-probe-373; observation time 2026-09-16T01:29Z; suspected fault storage-stall-473; post-change test storage-soak-573; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1173 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-29"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-29", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-30-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1174; harm check storage-probe-374; observation time 2026-09-17T06:42Z; suspected fault storage-race-474; post-change test storage-drill-574; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for storage-inc-1174; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1174; harm check storage-probe-374; observation time 2026-09-17T06:42Z; suspected fault storage-race-474; post-change test storage-drill-574; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1174 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "both of those"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-30"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-30", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-30-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1174; harm check storage-probe-374; observation time 2026-09-17T06:42Z; suspected fault storage-race-474; post-change test storage-drill-574; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for storage-inc-1174; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1174; harm check storage-probe-374; observation time 2026-09-17T06:42Z; suspected fault storage-race-474; post-change test storage-drill-574; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1174 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-30"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-30", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-31-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1175; harm check storage-probe-375; observation time 2026-09-18T11:55Z; suspected fault storage-leak-475; post-change test storage-fault-injection-575; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for storage-inc-1175; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1175; harm check storage-probe-375; observation time 2026-09-18T11:55Z; suspected fault storage-leak-475; post-change test storage-fault-injection-575; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1175 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-31"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-31", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-31-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1175; harm check storage-probe-375; observation time 2026-09-18T11:55Z; suspected fault storage-leak-475; post-change test storage-fault-injection-575; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for storage-inc-1175; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident storage-inc-1175; harm check storage-probe-375; observation time 2026-09-18T11:55Z; suspected fault storage-leak-475; post-change test storage-fault-injection-575; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: storage-inc-1175 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-31"}, "domain": "storage", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-31", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-32-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1176; harm check provisioning-probe-376; observation time 2026-09-11T16:08Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-476; post-change test provisioning-replay-576; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for provisioning-inc-1176; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1176; harm check provisioning-probe-376; observation time 2026-09-11T16:08Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-476; post-change test provisioning-replay-576; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1176 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-32"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-32", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-32-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1176; harm check provisioning-probe-376; observation time 2026-09-11T16:08Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-476; post-change test provisioning-replay-576; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for provisioning-inc-1176; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1176; harm check provisioning-probe-376; observation time 2026-09-11T16:08Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-476; post-change test provisioning-replay-576; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1176 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-32"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-32", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-33-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1177; harm check provisioning-probe-377; observation time 2026-09-12T21:21Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-477; post-change test provisioning-soak-577; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for provisioning-inc-1177; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1177; harm check provisioning-probe-377; observation time 2026-09-12T21:21Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-477; post-change test provisioning-soak-577; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1177 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "neither of those"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-33"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-33", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-33-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1177; harm check provisioning-probe-377; observation time 2026-09-12T21:21Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-477; post-change test provisioning-soak-577; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for provisioning-inc-1177; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1177; harm check provisioning-probe-377; observation time 2026-09-12T21:21Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-477; post-change test provisioning-soak-577; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1177 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-33"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-33", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-34-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1178; harm check provisioning-probe-378; observation time 2026-09-13T02:34Z; suspected fault provisioning-backlog-478; post-change test provisioning-drill-578; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for provisioning-inc-1178; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1178; harm check provisioning-probe-378; observation time 2026-09-13T02:34Z; suspected fault provisioning-backlog-478; post-change test provisioning-drill-578; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1178 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-34"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-34", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-34-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1178; harm check provisioning-probe-378; observation time 2026-09-13T02:34Z; suspected fault provisioning-backlog-478; post-change test provisioning-drill-578; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for provisioning-inc-1178; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1178; harm check provisioning-probe-378; observation time 2026-09-13T02:34Z; suspected fault provisioning-backlog-478; post-change test provisioning-drill-578; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1178 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-34"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-34", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-35-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1179; harm check provisioning-probe-379; observation time 2026-09-14T07:47Z; suspected fault provisioning-stall-479; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-579; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for provisioning-inc-1179; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1179; harm check provisioning-probe-379; observation time 2026-09-14T07:47Z; suspected fault provisioning-stall-479; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-579; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1179 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-35"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-35", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-35-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1179; harm check provisioning-probe-379; observation time 2026-09-14T07:47Z; suspected fault provisioning-stall-479; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-579; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for provisioning-inc-1179; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1179; harm check provisioning-probe-379; observation time 2026-09-14T07:47Z; suspected fault provisioning-stall-479; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-579; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1179 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-35"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-35", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-36-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1180; harm check provisioning-probe-380; observation time 2026-09-15T12:00Z; suspected fault provisioning-race-480; post-change test provisioning-replay-580; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for provisioning-inc-1180; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1180; harm check provisioning-probe-380; observation time 2026-09-15T12:00Z; suspected fault provisioning-race-480; post-change test provisioning-replay-580; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1180 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-36"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-36", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-36-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1180; harm check provisioning-probe-380; observation time 2026-09-15T12:00Z; suspected fault provisioning-race-480; post-change test provisioning-replay-580; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for provisioning-inc-1180; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1180; harm check provisioning-probe-380; observation time 2026-09-15T12:00Z; suspected fault provisioning-race-480; post-change test provisioning-replay-580; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1180 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-36"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-36", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-37-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1181; harm check provisioning-probe-381; observation time 2026-09-16T17:13Z; suspected fault provisioning-leak-481; post-change test provisioning-soak-581; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for provisioning-inc-1181; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1181; harm check provisioning-probe-381; observation time 2026-09-16T17:13Z; suspected fault provisioning-leak-481; post-change test provisioning-soak-581; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1181 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-37"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-37", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-37-004", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1181; harm check provisioning-probe-381; observation time 2026-09-16T17:13Z; suspected fault provisioning-leak-481; post-change test provisioning-soak-581; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for provisioning-inc-1181; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1181; harm check provisioning-probe-381; observation time 2026-09-16T17:13Z; suspected fault provisioning-leak-481; post-change test provisioning-soak-581; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1181 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-37"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-37", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-38-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1182; harm check provisioning-probe-382; observation time 2026-09-17T22:26Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-482; post-change test provisioning-drill-582; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for provisioning-inc-1182; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1182; harm check provisioning-probe-382; observation time 2026-09-17T22:26Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-482; post-change test provisioning-drill-582; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1182 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-38"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-38", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-38-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1182; harm check provisioning-probe-382; observation time 2026-09-17T22:26Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-482; post-change test provisioning-drill-582; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for provisioning-inc-1182; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1182; harm check provisioning-probe-382; observation time 2026-09-17T22:26Z; suspected fault provisioning-lock-482; post-change test provisioning-drill-582; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1182 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-38"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-38", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-39-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1183; harm check provisioning-probe-383; observation time 2026-09-18T03:39Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-483; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-583; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for provisioning-inc-1183; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1183; harm check provisioning-probe-383; observation time 2026-09-18T03:39Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-483; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-583; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1183 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-39"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-39", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-39-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1183; harm check provisioning-probe-383; observation time 2026-09-18T03:39Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-483; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-583; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for provisioning-inc-1183; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident provisioning-inc-1183; harm check provisioning-probe-383; observation time 2026-09-18T03:39Z; suspected fault provisioning-quota-483; post-change test provisioning-fault-injection-583; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: provisioning-inc-1183 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-39"}, "domain": "provisioning", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-39", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-40-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1184; harm check notifications-probe-384; observation time 2026-09-11T08:52Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-484; post-change test notifications-replay-584; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for notifications-inc-1184; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1184; harm check notifications-probe-384; observation time 2026-09-11T08:52Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-484; post-change test notifications-replay-584; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1184 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "neither of those", "both of those"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-40"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-40", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-40-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1184; harm check notifications-probe-384; observation time 2026-09-11T08:52Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-484; post-change test notifications-replay-584; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for notifications-inc-1184; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1184; harm check notifications-probe-384; observation time 2026-09-11T08:52Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-484; post-change test notifications-replay-584; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1184 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-40"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-40", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-41-002", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1185; harm check notifications-probe-385; observation time 2026-09-12T13:05Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-485; post-change test notifications-soak-585; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for notifications-inc-1185; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1185; harm check notifications-probe-385; observation time 2026-09-12T13:05Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-485; post-change test notifications-soak-585; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1185 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-41"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-41", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-41-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1185; harm check notifications-probe-385; observation time 2026-09-12T13:05Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-485; post-change test notifications-soak-585; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for notifications-inc-1185; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1185; harm check notifications-probe-385; observation time 2026-09-12T13:05Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-485; post-change test notifications-soak-585; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1185 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-41"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-41", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-42-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1186; harm check notifications-probe-386; observation time 2026-09-13T18:18Z; suspected fault notifications-race-486; post-change test notifications-drill-586; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for notifications-inc-1186; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1186; harm check notifications-probe-386; observation time 2026-09-13T18:18Z; suspected fault notifications-race-486; post-change test notifications-drill-586; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1186 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-42"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-42", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-42-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1186; harm check notifications-probe-386; observation time 2026-09-13T18:18Z; suspected fault notifications-race-486; post-change test notifications-drill-586; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for notifications-inc-1186; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1186; harm check notifications-probe-386; observation time 2026-09-13T18:18Z; suspected fault notifications-race-486; post-change test notifications-drill-586; reporting desk night desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1186 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-42"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-42", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-43-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1187; harm check notifications-probe-387; observation time 2026-09-14T23:31Z; suspected fault notifications-leak-487; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-587; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for notifications-inc-1187; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1187; harm check notifications-probe-387; observation time 2026-09-14T23:31Z; suspected fault notifications-leak-487; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-587; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1187 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-43"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-43", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-43-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1187; harm check notifications-probe-387; observation time 2026-09-14T23:31Z; suspected fault notifications-leak-487; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-587; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for notifications-inc-1187; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1187; harm check notifications-probe-387; observation time 2026-09-14T23:31Z; suspected fault notifications-leak-487; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-587; reporting desk shift A desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1187 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-43"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-43", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-44-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1188; harm check notifications-probe-388; observation time 2026-09-15T04:44Z; suspected fault notifications-lock-488; post-change test notifications-replay-588; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for notifications-inc-1188; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1188; harm check notifications-probe-388; observation time 2026-09-15T04:44Z; suspected fault notifications-lock-488; post-change test notifications-replay-588; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1188 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "neither of those"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-44"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-44", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-44-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1188; harm check notifications-probe-388; observation time 2026-09-15T04:44Z; suspected fault notifications-lock-488; post-change test notifications-replay-588; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for notifications-inc-1188; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1188; harm check notifications-probe-388; observation time 2026-09-15T04:44Z; suspected fault notifications-lock-488; post-change test notifications-replay-588; reporting desk shift C desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1188 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["both workstreams may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-44"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-44", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-45-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1189; harm check notifications-probe-389; observation time 2026-09-16T09:57Z; suspected fault notifications-quota-489; post-change test notifications-soak-589; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for notifications-inc-1189; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1189; harm check notifications-probe-389; observation time 2026-09-16T09:57Z; suspected fault notifications-quota-489; post-change test notifications-soak-589; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1189 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "only that the harm was checked and found gone", "both of those"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-45"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-45", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-45-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1189; harm check notifications-probe-389; observation time 2026-09-16T09:57Z; suspected fault notifications-quota-489; post-change test notifications-soak-589; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for notifications-inc-1189; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1189; harm check notifications-probe-389; observation time 2026-09-16T09:57Z; suspected fault notifications-quota-489; post-change test notifications-soak-589; reporting desk weekend desk; shift 00:00-08:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1189 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "neither workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": true, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-45"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-45", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-46-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1190; harm check notifications-probe-390; observation time 2026-09-17T14:10Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-490; post-change test notifications-drill-590; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for notifications-inc-1190; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1190; harm check notifications-probe-390; observation time 2026-09-17T14:10Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-490; post-change test notifications-drill-590; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1190 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["neither of those", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "only that the harm was checked and found gone"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-46"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-46", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-46-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1190; harm check notifications-probe-390; observation time 2026-09-17T14:10Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-490; post-change test notifications-drill-590; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for notifications-inc-1190; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1190; harm check notifications-probe-390; observation time 2026-09-17T14:10Z; suspected fault notifications-backlog-490; post-change test notifications-drill-590; reporting desk release desk; shift 08:00-16:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1190 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close", "only the repair workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": true, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-46"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-46", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-ass-47-001", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1191; harm check notifications-probe-391; observation time 2026-09-18T19:23Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-491; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-591; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for notifications-inc-1191; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1191; harm check notifications-probe-391; observation time 2026-09-18T19:23Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-491; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-591; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1191 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Which of these has the handoff message itself claimed?", "options": ["only that the harm was checked and found gone", "only that the fault was repaired and re-tested", "both of those", "neither of those"], "answer": "neither of those", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::assertion", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "assertion", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-47"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-47", "question_type": "assertion", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-neither-claim-rou-47-000", "english": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1191; harm check notifications-probe-391; observation time 2026-09-18T19:23Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-491; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-591; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: No axis claim is recorded for notifications-inc-1191; clarification is required before either workstream closes.", "ainglish": "FROZEN WORKFLOW POLICY (identical in every handoff; applied to the message alone): a workstream closes only on an explicit corresponding claim in the handoff - the recovery workstream on a claim about the harm's observed state, the repair workstream on a claim about the fault's correction. Both closable: record the incident closed. Neither closable: escalate to the duty officer. The policy names no harm and no fault of its own.\n\nINCIDENT FILE (references only; no outcome is recorded anywhere in this file): incident notifications-inc-1191; harm check notifications-probe-391; observation time 2026-09-18T19:23Z; suspected fault notifications-stall-491; post-change test notifications-fault-injection-591; reporting desk duty desk; shift 16:00-24:00Z.\n\nHANDOFF MESSAGE: notifications-inc-1191 - no axis claim recorded; clarification required before either workstream closes.", "question": "Applying the frozen workflow policy to the handoff message alone, what follows for the two workstreams?", "options": ["only the repair workstream may close", "only the recovery workstream may close", "both workstreams may close", "neither workstream may close"], "answer": "neither workstream may close", "settlement_stratum": "neither-claim::routing", "strata": {"assertion_cell": "neither-claim", "question_type": "routing", "physical_impact_recovered": false, "physical_cause_resolved": false, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-47"}, "domain": "notifications", "handoff": "IR55-neither-claim-47", "question_type": "routing", "assertion_cell": "neither-claim"}, {"id": "IR55-cal-00", "calibration": true, "calibration_scope": "target-independent", "calibration_construct": "resolved vault custodian", "english": "The registered custodian of vault V-3100 is not recorded.", "ainglish": "The registered custodian of vault V-3100 is Aldis.", "question": "Who is the registered custodian of vault V-3100?", "options": ["Quill", "Aldis", "Nesta", "Tarrow", "Wexley", "not determined"], "answer": "Aldis"}, {"id": "IR55-cal-01", "calibration": true, "calibration_scope": "target-independent", "calibration_construct": "resolved vault custodian", "english": "The registered custodian of vault V-3111 is not recorded.", "ainglish": "The registered custodian of vault V-3111 is Brann.", "question": "Who is the registered custodian of vault V-3111?", "options": ["not determined", "Ulric", "Brann", "Rook", "Yarrow", "Orrin"], "answer": "Brann"}, {"id": "IR55-cal-02", "calibration": true, "calibration_scope": "target-independent", "calibration_construct": "resolved vault custodian", "english": "The registered custodian of vault V-3122 is not recorded.", "ainglish": "The registered custodian of vault V-3122 is Corvo.", "question": "Who is the registered custodian of vault V-3122?", "options": ["not determined", "Selby", "Pell", "Corvo", "Marlow", "Vane"], "answer": "Corvo"}, {"id": "IR55-cal-03", "calibration": true, "calibration_scope": "target-independent", "calibration_construct": "resolved vault custodian", "english": "The registered custodian of vault V-3133 is not recorded.", "ainglish": "The registered custodian of vault V-3133 is Dellan.", "question": "Who is the registered custodian of vault V-3133?", "options": ["not determined", "Quill", "Tarrow", "Dellan", "Nesta", "Wexley"], "answer": "Dellan"}, {"id": "IR55-cal-04", "calibration": true, "calibration_scope": "target-independent", "calibration_construct": "resolved vault custodian", "english": "The registered custodian of vault V-3144 is not recorded.", "ainglish": "The registered custodian of vault V-3144 is Esker.", "question": "Who is the registered custodian of vault V-3144?", "options": ["Orrin", "Ulric", "Yarrow", "not determined", "Rook", "Esker"], "answer": "Esker"}, {"id": "IR55-cal-05", "calibration": true, "calibration_scope": "target-independent", "calibration_construct": "resolved vault custodian", "english": "The registered custodian of vault V-3155 is not recorded.", "ainglish": "The registered custodian of vault V-3155 is Farrow.", "question": "Who is the registered custodian of vault V-3155?", "options": ["Vane", "Selby", "not determined", "Marlow", "Farrow", "Pell"], "answer": "Farrow"}, {"id": "IR55-cal-06", "calibration": true, "calibration_scope": "target-independent", "calibration_construct": "resolved vault custodian", "english": "The registered custodian of vault V-3166 is not recorded.", "ainglish": "The registered custodian of vault V-3166 is Gilda.", "question": "Who is the registered custodian of vault V-3166?", "options": ["not determined", "Gilda", "Wexley", "Tarrow", "Nesta", "Quill"], "answer": "Gilda"}, {"id": "IR55-cal-07", "calibration": true, "calibration_scope": "target-independent", "calibration_construct": "resolved vault custodian", "english": "The registered custodian of vault V-3177 is not recorded.", "ainglish": "The registered custodian of vault V-3177 is Hollis.", "question": "Who is the registered custodian of vault V-3177?", "options": ["not determined", "Orrin", "Rook", "Yarrow", "Hollis", "Ulric"], "answer": "Hollis"}, {"id": "IR55-cal-08", "calibration": true, "calibration_scope": "target-independent", "calibration_construct": "resolved vault custodian", "english": "The registered custodian of vault V-3188 is not recorded.", "ainglish": "The registered custodian of vault V-3188 is Ivar.", "question": "Who is the registered custodian of vault V-3188?", "options": ["Pell", "Vane", "not determined", "Ivar", "Marlow", "Selby"], "answer": "Ivar"}, {"id": "IR55-cal-09", "calibration": true, "calibration_scope": "target-independent", "calibration_construct": "resolved vault custodian", "english": "The registered custodian of vault V-3199 is not recorded.", "ainglish": "The registered custodian of vault V-3199 is Jorun.", "question": "Who is the registered custodian of vault V-3199?", "options": ["Nesta", "not determined", "Wexley", "Quill", "Jorun", "Tarrow"], "answer": "Jorun"}, {"id": "IR55-cal-10", "calibration": true, "calibration_scope": "target-independent", "calibration_construct": "resolved vault custodian", "english": "The registered custodian of vault V-3210 is not recorded.", "ainglish": "The registered custodian of vault V-3210 is Kell.", "question": "Who is the registered custodian of vault V-3210?", "options": ["Yarrow", "Rook", "Ulric", "Orrin", "not determined", "Kell"], "answer": "Kell"}, {"id": "IR55-cal-11", "calibration": true, "calibration_scope": "target-independent", "calibration_construct": "resolved vault custodian", "english": "The registered custodian of vault V-3221 is not recorded.", "ainglish": "The registered custodian of vault V-3221 is Lumen.", "question": "Who is the registered custodian of vault V-3221?", "options": ["Marlow", "Pell", "Selby", "Vane", "Lumen", "not determined"], "answer": "Lumen"}]}