{ "kind": "ainglish.r28-items-artifact.v1", "sha256": "0c6f2716f76800143c0a721bb3ccf2824a922f79eb2c4517aabc467aa81b9d80", "items": [ { "english": "Name the process behind the cache-pool drain recorded as drain-100@run-3: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(drain-100@run-3)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "incident response", "intentionality": "known cause; no valid warrant", "reference": "drain-100@run-3" }, "options": [ "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-000" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Ines's cache-pool drain (drain-100@run-3) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(drain-100@run-3)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "incident response", "intentionality": "known cause; no valid warrant", "reference": "drain-100@run-3" }, "options": [ "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-001" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the cache-pool drain recorded as drain-107@run-4: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(drain-107@run-4)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "incident response", "intentionality": "valid warrant; proximate cause unknown", "reference": "drain-107@run-4" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-002" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Mateo's cache-pool drain (drain-107@run-4) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(drain-107@run-4)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "incident response", "intentionality": "valid warrant; proximate cause unknown", "reference": "drain-107@run-4" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-003" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the cache-pool drain recorded as drain-114@run-5: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(drain-114@run-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "incident response", "intentionality": "one fact may be both cause and warrant", "reference": "drain-114@run-5" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-004" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Nadia's cache-pool drain (drain-114@run-5) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(drain-114@run-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "incident response", "intentionality": "one fact may be both cause and warrant", "reference": "drain-114@run-5" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-005" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the cache-pool drain recorded as drain-121@run-6: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(drain-121@run-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "incident response", "intentionality": "accidental event; no attributable choice", "reference": "drain-121@run-6" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-006" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Kwame's cache-pool drain (drain-121@run-6) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(drain-121@run-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "incident response", "intentionality": "accidental event; no attributable choice", "reference": "drain-121@run-6" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-007" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the cache-pool drain recorded as drain-128@run-7: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(drain-128@run-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "incident response", "intentionality": "coercion", "reference": "drain-128@run-7" }, "options": [ "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-008" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Lucia's cache-pool drain (drain-128@run-7) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(drain-128@run-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "incident response", "intentionality": "coercion", "reference": "drain-128@run-7" }, "options": [ "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-009" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the audit-file rewrite recorded as rewrite-109@batch-3: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(rewrite-109@batch-3)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "file operation", "intentionality": "automation executing a policy", "reference": "rewrite-109@batch-3" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-010" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Petra's audit-file rewrite (rewrite-109@batch-3) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(rewrite-109@batch-3)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "file operation", "intentionality": "automation executing a policy", "reference": "rewrite-109@batch-3" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-011" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the audit-file rewrite recorded as rewrite-116@batch-4: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(rewrite-116@batch-4)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "file operation", "intentionality": "authorized act produced by a bug", "reference": "rewrite-116@batch-4" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-012" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Sandeep's audit-file rewrite (rewrite-116@batch-4) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(rewrite-116@batch-4)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "file operation", "intentionality": "authorized act produced by a bug", "reference": "rewrite-116@batch-4" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-013" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the audit-file rewrite recorded as rewrite-123@batch-5: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(rewrite-123@batch-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "file operation", "intentionality": "unjustified act with a complete trace", "reference": "rewrite-123@batch-5" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-014" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Chiara's audit-file rewrite (rewrite-123@batch-5) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(rewrite-123@batch-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "file operation", "intentionality": "unjustified act with a complete trace", "reference": "rewrite-123@batch-5" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-015" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the audit-file rewrite recorded as rewrite-130@batch-6: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(rewrite-130@batch-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "file operation", "intentionality": "known cause; no valid warrant", "reference": "rewrite-130@batch-6" }, "options": [ "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-016" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Yusuf's audit-file rewrite (rewrite-130@batch-6) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(rewrite-130@batch-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "file operation", "intentionality": "known cause; no valid warrant", "reference": "rewrite-130@batch-6" }, "options": [ "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-017" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the audit-file rewrite recorded as rewrite-137@batch-7: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(rewrite-137@batch-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "file operation", "intentionality": "valid warrant; proximate cause unknown", "reference": "rewrite-137@batch-7" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-018" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Greta's audit-file rewrite (rewrite-137@batch-7) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(rewrite-137@batch-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "file operation", "intentionality": "valid warrant; proximate cause unknown", "reference": "rewrite-137@batch-7" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-019" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the checkout-service pin recorded as pin-118@release-3: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(pin-118@release-3)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "deployment", "intentionality": "one fact may be both cause and warrant", "reference": "pin-118@release-3" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-020" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Omar's checkout-service pin (pin-118@release-3) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(pin-118@release-3)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "deployment", "intentionality": "one fact may be both cause and warrant", "reference": "pin-118@release-3" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-021" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the checkout-service pin recorded as pin-125@release-4: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(pin-125@release-4)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "deployment", "intentionality": "accidental event; no attributable choice", "reference": "pin-125@release-4" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-022" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Lena's checkout-service pin (pin-125@release-4) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(pin-125@release-4)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "deployment", "intentionality": "accidental event; no attributable choice", "reference": "pin-125@release-4" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-023" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the checkout-service pin recorded as pin-132@release-5: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(pin-132@release-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "deployment", "intentionality": "coercion", "reference": "pin-132@release-5" }, "options": [ "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-024" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Rafael's checkout-service pin (pin-132@release-5) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(pin-132@release-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "deployment", "intentionality": "coercion", "reference": "pin-132@release-5" }, "options": [ "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-025" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the checkout-service pin recorded as pin-139@release-6: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(pin-139@release-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "deployment", "intentionality": "automation executing a policy", "reference": "pin-139@release-6" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-026" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Tessa's checkout-service pin (pin-139@release-6) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(pin-139@release-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "deployment", "intentionality": "automation executing a policy", "reference": "pin-139@release-6" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-027" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the checkout-service pin recorded as pin-146@release-7: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(pin-146@release-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "deployment", "intentionality": "authorized act produced by a bug", "reference": "pin-146@release-7" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-028" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Milo's checkout-service pin (pin-146@release-7) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(pin-146@release-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "deployment", "intentionality": "authorized act produced by a bug", "reference": "pin-146@release-7" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-029" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the hidden-thread restoration recorded as restore-127@case-3: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(restore-127@case-3)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "moderation", "intentionality": "unjustified act with a complete trace", "reference": "restore-127@case-3" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-030" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Anja's hidden-thread restoration (restore-127@case-3) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(restore-127@case-3)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "moderation", "intentionality": "unjustified act with a complete trace", "reference": "restore-127@case-3" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-031" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the hidden-thread restoration recorded as restore-134@case-4: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(restore-134@case-4)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "moderation", "intentionality": "known cause; no valid warrant", "reference": "restore-134@case-4" }, "options": [ "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-032" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Viktor's hidden-thread restoration (restore-134@case-4) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(restore-134@case-4)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "moderation", "intentionality": "known cause; no valid warrant", "reference": "restore-134@case-4" }, "options": [ "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-033" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the hidden-thread restoration recorded as restore-141@case-5: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(restore-141@case-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "moderation", "intentionality": "valid warrant; proximate cause unknown", "reference": "restore-141@case-5" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-034" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Noor's hidden-thread restoration (restore-141@case-5) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(restore-141@case-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "moderation", "intentionality": "valid warrant; proximate cause unknown", "reference": "restore-141@case-5" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-035" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the hidden-thread restoration recorded as restore-148@case-6: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(restore-148@case-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "moderation", "intentionality": "one fact may be both cause and warrant", "reference": "restore-148@case-6" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-036" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Diego's hidden-thread restoration (restore-148@case-6) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(restore-148@case-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "moderation", "intentionality": "one fact may be both cause and warrant", "reference": "restore-148@case-6" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-037" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the hidden-thread restoration recorded as restore-155@case-7: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(restore-155@case-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "moderation", "intentionality": "accidental event; no attributable choice", "reference": "restore-155@case-7" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-038" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Farah's hidden-thread restoration (restore-155@case-7) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(restore-155@case-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "moderation", "intentionality": "accidental event; no attributable choice", "reference": "restore-155@case-7" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-039" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the disputed-charge hold recorded as hold-136@txn-3: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(hold-136@txn-3)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "payments", "intentionality": "coercion", "reference": "hold-136@txn-3" }, "options": [ "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-040" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Hugo's disputed-charge hold (hold-136@txn-3) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(hold-136@txn-3)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "payments", "intentionality": "coercion", "reference": "hold-136@txn-3" }, "options": [ "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-041" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the disputed-charge hold recorded as hold-143@txn-4: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(hold-143@txn-4)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "payments", "intentionality": "automation executing a policy", "reference": "hold-143@txn-4" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-042" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Iris's disputed-charge hold (hold-143@txn-4) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(hold-143@txn-4)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "payments", "intentionality": "automation executing a policy", "reference": "hold-143@txn-4" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-043" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the disputed-charge hold recorded as hold-150@txn-5: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(hold-150@txn-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "payments", "intentionality": "authorized act produced by a bug", "reference": "hold-150@txn-5" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-044" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Jonas's disputed-charge hold (hold-150@txn-5) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(hold-150@txn-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "payments", "intentionality": "authorized act produced by a bug", "reference": "hold-150@txn-5" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-045" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the disputed-charge hold recorded as hold-157@txn-6: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(hold-157@txn-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "payments", "intentionality": "unjustified act with a complete trace", "reference": "hold-157@txn-6" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-046" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Katja's disputed-charge hold (hold-157@txn-6) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(hold-157@txn-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "payments", "intentionality": "unjustified act with a complete trace", "reference": "hold-157@txn-6" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-047" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the disputed-charge hold recorded as hold-164@txn-7: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(hold-164@txn-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "payments", "intentionality": "known cause; no valid warrant", "reference": "hold-164@txn-7" }, "options": [ "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-048" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Malik's disputed-charge hold (hold-164@txn-7) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(hold-164@txn-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "payments", "intentionality": "known cause; no valid warrant", "reference": "hold-164@txn-7" }, "options": [ "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-049" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the planning-session split recorded as split-145@slot-3: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(split-145@slot-3)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "scheduling", "intentionality": "valid warrant; proximate cause unknown", "reference": "split-145@slot-3" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-050" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Nadja's planning-session split (split-145@slot-3) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(split-145@slot-3)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "scheduling", "intentionality": "valid warrant; proximate cause unknown", "reference": "split-145@slot-3" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-051" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the planning-session split recorded as split-152@slot-4: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(split-152@slot-4)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "scheduling", "intentionality": "one fact may be both cause and warrant", "reference": "split-152@slot-4" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-052" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Otto's planning-session split (split-152@slot-4) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(split-152@slot-4)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "scheduling", "intentionality": "one fact may be both cause and warrant", "reference": "split-152@slot-4" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-053" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the planning-session split recorded as split-159@slot-5: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(split-159@slot-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "scheduling", "intentionality": "accidental event; no attributable choice", "reference": "split-159@slot-5" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-054" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Paula's planning-session split (split-159@slot-5) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(split-159@slot-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "scheduling", "intentionality": "accidental event; no attributable choice", "reference": "split-159@slot-5" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-055" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the planning-session split recorded as split-166@slot-6: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(split-166@slot-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "scheduling", "intentionality": "coercion", "reference": "split-166@slot-6" }, "options": [ "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-056" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Quentin's planning-session split (split-166@slot-6) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(split-166@slot-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "scheduling", "intentionality": "coercion", "reference": "split-166@slot-6" }, "options": [ "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-057" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the planning-session split recorded as split-173@slot-7: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(split-173@slot-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "scheduling", "intentionality": "automation executing a policy", "reference": "split-173@slot-7" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-058" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Rosa's planning-session split (split-173@slot-7) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(split-173@slot-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "scheduling", "intentionality": "automation executing a policy", "reference": "split-173@slot-7" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-059" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the vendor-badge reissue recorded as reissue-154@gate-3: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(reissue-154@gate-3)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "access control", "intentionality": "authorized act produced by a bug", "reference": "reissue-154@gate-3" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-060" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Sven's vendor-badge reissue (reissue-154@gate-3) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(reissue-154@gate-3)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "access control", "intentionality": "authorized act produced by a bug", "reference": "reissue-154@gate-3" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-061" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the vendor-badge reissue recorded as reissue-161@gate-4: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(reissue-161@gate-4)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "access control", "intentionality": "unjustified act with a complete trace", "reference": "reissue-161@gate-4" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-062" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Tara's vendor-badge reissue (reissue-161@gate-4) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(reissue-161@gate-4)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "access control", "intentionality": "unjustified act with a complete trace", "reference": "reissue-161@gate-4" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-063" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the vendor-badge reissue recorded as reissue-168@gate-5: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(reissue-168@gate-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "access control", "intentionality": "known cause; no valid warrant", "reference": "reissue-168@gate-5" }, "options": [ "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-064" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Umar's vendor-badge reissue (reissue-168@gate-5) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(reissue-168@gate-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "access control", "intentionality": "known cause; no valid warrant", "reference": "reissue-168@gate-5" }, "options": [ "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-065" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the vendor-badge reissue recorded as reissue-175@gate-6: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(reissue-175@gate-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "access control", "intentionality": "valid warrant; proximate cause unknown", "reference": "reissue-175@gate-6" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-066" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Vera's vendor-badge reissue (reissue-175@gate-6) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(reissue-175@gate-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "access control", "intentionality": "valid warrant; proximate cause unknown", "reference": "reissue-175@gate-6" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-067" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the vendor-badge reissue recorded as reissue-182@gate-7: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(reissue-182@gate-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "access control", "intentionality": "one fact may be both cause and warrant", "reference": "reissue-182@gate-7" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-068" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Wim's vendor-badge reissue (reissue-182@gate-7) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(reissue-182@gate-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "access control", "intentionality": "one fact may be both cause and warrant", "reference": "reissue-182@gate-7" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-069" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the secondary-coolant vent recorded as vent-163@drill-3: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(vent-163@drill-3)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "safety", "intentionality": "accidental event; no attributable choice", "reference": "vent-163@drill-3" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-070" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Xenia's secondary-coolant vent (vent-163@drill-3) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(vent-163@drill-3)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "safety", "intentionality": "accidental event; no attributable choice", "reference": "vent-163@drill-3" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-071" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the secondary-coolant vent recorded as vent-170@drill-4: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(vent-170@drill-4)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "safety", "intentionality": "coercion", "reference": "vent-170@drill-4" }, "options": [ "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-072" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Yannis's secondary-coolant vent (vent-170@drill-4) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(vent-170@drill-4)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "safety", "intentionality": "coercion", "reference": "vent-170@drill-4" }, "options": [ "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-073" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the secondary-coolant vent recorded as vent-177@drill-5: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(vent-177@drill-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "safety", "intentionality": "automation executing a policy", "reference": "vent-177@drill-5" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-074" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Zelda's secondary-coolant vent (vent-177@drill-5) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(vent-177@drill-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "safety", "intentionality": "automation executing a policy", "reference": "vent-177@drill-5" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-075" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the secondary-coolant vent recorded as vent-184@drill-6: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(vent-184@drill-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "safety", "intentionality": "authorized act produced by a bug", "reference": "vent-184@drill-6" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-076" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Anton's secondary-coolant vent (vent-184@drill-6) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(vent-184@drill-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "safety", "intentionality": "authorized act produced by a bug", "reference": "vent-184@drill-6" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-077" }, { "english": "Name the process behind the secondary-coolant vent recorded as vent-191@drill-7: the sequence of steps, choices, or failures that brought it about. Whether it was warranted is a separate question.", "ainglish": "cause-question(vent-191@drill-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "safety", "intentionality": "unjustified act with a complete trace", "reference": "vent-191@drill-7" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-care-078" }, { "english": "What, if anything, made Bea's secondary-coolant vent (vent-191@drill-7) warranted — a permission, an aim, a trade-off? Saying that nothing did is a complete answer; the process behind it is not what is asked.", "ainglish": "justification-question(vent-191@drill-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "careful", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-careful", "strata": { "domain": "safety", "intentionality": "unjustified act with a complete trace", "reference": "vent-191@drill-7" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-care-079" }, { "english": "Why did Cem escalate the on-call handover escalate-500@run-5?", "ainglish": "cause-question(escalate-500@run-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "incident response", "intentionality": "accidental event; no attributable choice", "reference": "escalate-500@run-5" }, "options": [ "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-080" }, { "english": "Why did Ulla escalate the on-call handover escalate-500@run-5?", "ainglish": "justification-question(escalate-500@run-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "incident response", "intentionality": "accidental event; no attributable choice", "reference": "escalate-500@run-5" }, "options": [ "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-081" }, { "english": "Why did Dana escalate the on-call handover escalate-511@run-6?", "ainglish": "cause-question(escalate-511@run-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "incident response", "intentionality": "coercion", "reference": "escalate-511@run-6" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-082" }, { "english": "Why did Vito escalate the on-call handover escalate-511@run-6?", "ainglish": "justification-question(escalate-511@run-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "incident response", "intentionality": "coercion", "reference": "escalate-511@run-6" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-083" }, { "english": "Why did Emil escalate the on-call handover escalate-522@run-7?", "ainglish": "cause-question(escalate-522@run-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "incident response", "intentionality": "automation executing a policy", "reference": "escalate-522@run-7" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-084" }, { "english": "Why did Wanda escalate the on-call handover escalate-522@run-7?", "ainglish": "justification-question(escalate-522@run-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "incident response", "intentionality": "automation executing a policy", "reference": "escalate-522@run-7" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-085" }, { "english": "Why did Freya escalate the on-call handover escalate-533@run-8?", "ainglish": "cause-question(escalate-533@run-8)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "incident response", "intentionality": "authorized act produced by a bug", "reference": "escalate-533@run-8" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-086" }, { "english": "Why did Ines escalate the on-call handover escalate-533@run-8?", "ainglish": "justification-question(escalate-533@run-8)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "incident response", "intentionality": "authorized act produced by a bug", "reference": "escalate-533@run-8" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-087" }, { "english": "Why did Gerd escalate the on-call handover escalate-544@run-9?", "ainglish": "cause-question(escalate-544@run-9)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "incident response", "intentionality": "unjustified act with a complete trace", "reference": "escalate-544@run-9" }, "options": [ "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-088" }, { "english": "Why did Mateo escalate the on-call handover escalate-544@run-9?", "ainglish": "justification-question(escalate-544@run-9)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "incident response", "intentionality": "unjustified act with a complete trace", "reference": "escalate-544@run-9" }, "options": [ "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-089" }, { "english": "Why did Hilda move the signed contract folder move-513@batch-5?", "ainglish": "cause-question(move-513@batch-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "file operation", "intentionality": "known cause; no valid warrant", "reference": "move-513@batch-5" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-090" }, { "english": "Why did Nadia move the signed contract folder move-513@batch-5?", "ainglish": "justification-question(move-513@batch-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "file operation", "intentionality": "known cause; no valid warrant", "reference": "move-513@batch-5" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-091" }, { "english": "Why did Ivan move the signed contract folder move-524@batch-6?", "ainglish": "cause-question(move-524@batch-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "file operation", "intentionality": "valid warrant; proximate cause unknown", "reference": "move-524@batch-6" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-092" }, { "english": "Why did Kwame move the signed contract folder move-524@batch-6?", "ainglish": "justification-question(move-524@batch-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "file operation", "intentionality": "valid warrant; proximate cause unknown", "reference": "move-524@batch-6" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-093" }, { "english": "Why did Jara move the signed contract folder move-535@batch-7?", "ainglish": "cause-question(move-535@batch-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "file operation", "intentionality": "one fact may be both cause and warrant", "reference": "move-535@batch-7" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-094" }, { "english": "Why did Lucia move the signed contract folder move-535@batch-7?", "ainglish": "justification-question(move-535@batch-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "file operation", "intentionality": "one fact may be both cause and warrant", "reference": "move-535@batch-7" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-095" }, { "english": "Why did Klaus move the signed contract folder move-546@batch-8?", "ainglish": "cause-question(move-546@batch-8)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "file operation", "intentionality": "accidental event; no attributable choice", "reference": "move-546@batch-8" }, "options": [ "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-096" }, { "english": "Why did Petra move the signed contract folder move-546@batch-8?", "ainglish": "justification-question(move-546@batch-8)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "file operation", "intentionality": "accidental event; no attributable choice", "reference": "move-546@batch-8" }, "options": [ "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-097" }, { "english": "Why did Lotte move the signed contract folder move-557@batch-9?", "ainglish": "cause-question(move-557@batch-9)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "file operation", "intentionality": "coercion", "reference": "move-557@batch-9" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-098" }, { "english": "Why did Sandeep move the signed contract folder move-557@batch-9?", "ainglish": "justification-question(move-557@batch-9)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "file operation", "intentionality": "coercion", "reference": "move-557@batch-9" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-099" }, { "english": "Why did Mira skip the canary stage skip-526@release-5?", "ainglish": "cause-question(skip-526@release-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "deployment", "intentionality": "automation executing a policy", "reference": "skip-526@release-5" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-100" }, { "english": "Why did Chiara skip the canary stage skip-526@release-5?", "ainglish": "justification-question(skip-526@release-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "deployment", "intentionality": "automation executing a policy", "reference": "skip-526@release-5" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-101" }, { "english": "Why did Nils skip the canary stage skip-537@release-6?", "ainglish": "cause-question(skip-537@release-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "deployment", "intentionality": "authorized act produced by a bug", "reference": "skip-537@release-6" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-102" }, { "english": "Why did Yusuf skip the canary stage skip-537@release-6?", "ainglish": "justification-question(skip-537@release-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "deployment", "intentionality": "authorized act produced by a bug", "reference": "skip-537@release-6" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-103" }, { "english": "Why did Olga skip the canary stage skip-548@release-7?", "ainglish": "cause-question(skip-548@release-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "deployment", "intentionality": "unjustified act with a complete trace", "reference": "skip-548@release-7" }, "options": [ "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-104" }, { "english": "Why did Greta skip the canary stage skip-548@release-7?", "ainglish": "justification-question(skip-548@release-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "deployment", "intentionality": "unjustified act with a complete trace", "reference": "skip-548@release-7" }, "options": [ "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-105" }, { "english": "Why did Pavel skip the canary stage skip-559@release-8?", "ainglish": "cause-question(skip-559@release-8)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "deployment", "intentionality": "known cause; no valid warrant", "reference": "skip-559@release-8" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-106" }, { "english": "Why did Omar skip the canary stage skip-559@release-8?", "ainglish": "justification-question(skip-559@release-8)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "deployment", "intentionality": "known cause; no valid warrant", "reference": "skip-559@release-8" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-107" }, { "english": "Why did Rita skip the canary stage skip-570@release-9?", "ainglish": "cause-question(skip-570@release-9)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "deployment", "intentionality": "valid warrant; proximate cause unknown", "reference": "skip-570@release-9" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-108" }, { "english": "Why did Lena skip the canary stage skip-570@release-9?", "ainglish": "justification-question(skip-570@release-9)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "deployment", "intentionality": "valid warrant; proximate cause unknown", "reference": "skip-570@release-9" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-109" }, { "english": "Why did Sami lock the pinned rules thread lock-539@case-5?", "ainglish": "cause-question(lock-539@case-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "moderation", "intentionality": "one fact may be both cause and warrant", "reference": "lock-539@case-5" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-110" }, { "english": "Why did Rafael lock the pinned rules thread lock-539@case-5?", "ainglish": "justification-question(lock-539@case-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "moderation", "intentionality": "one fact may be both cause and warrant", "reference": "lock-539@case-5" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-111" }, { "english": "Why did Theo lock the pinned rules thread lock-550@case-6?", "ainglish": "cause-question(lock-550@case-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "moderation", "intentionality": "accidental event; no attributable choice", "reference": "lock-550@case-6" }, "options": [ "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-112" }, { "english": "Why did Tessa lock the pinned rules thread lock-550@case-6?", "ainglish": "justification-question(lock-550@case-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "moderation", "intentionality": "accidental event; no attributable choice", "reference": "lock-550@case-6" }, "options": [ "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-113" }, { "english": "Why did Ulla lock the pinned rules thread lock-561@case-7?", "ainglish": "cause-question(lock-561@case-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "moderation", "intentionality": "coercion", "reference": "lock-561@case-7" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-114" }, { "english": "Why did Milo lock the pinned rules thread lock-561@case-7?", "ainglish": "justification-question(lock-561@case-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "moderation", "intentionality": "coercion", "reference": "lock-561@case-7" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-115" }, { "english": "Why did Vito lock the pinned rules thread lock-572@case-8?", "ainglish": "cause-question(lock-572@case-8)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "moderation", "intentionality": "automation executing a policy", "reference": "lock-572@case-8" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-116" }, { "english": "Why did Anja lock the pinned rules thread lock-572@case-8?", "ainglish": "justification-question(lock-572@case-8)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "moderation", "intentionality": "automation executing a policy", "reference": "lock-572@case-8" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-117" }, { "english": "Why did Wanda lock the pinned rules thread lock-583@case-9?", "ainglish": "cause-question(lock-583@case-9)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "moderation", "intentionality": "authorized act produced by a bug", "reference": "lock-583@case-9" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-118" }, { "english": "Why did Viktor lock the pinned rules thread lock-583@case-9?", "ainglish": "justification-question(lock-583@case-9)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "moderation", "intentionality": "authorized act produced by a bug", "reference": "lock-583@case-9" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-119" }, { "english": "Why did Ines credit the returned deposit credit-552@txn-5?", "ainglish": "cause-question(credit-552@txn-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "payments", "intentionality": "unjustified act with a complete trace", "reference": "credit-552@txn-5" }, "options": [ "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-120" }, { "english": "Why did Noor credit the returned deposit credit-552@txn-5?", "ainglish": "justification-question(credit-552@txn-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "payments", "intentionality": "unjustified act with a complete trace", "reference": "credit-552@txn-5" }, "options": [ "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-121" }, { "english": "Why did Mateo credit the returned deposit credit-563@txn-6?", "ainglish": "cause-question(credit-563@txn-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "payments", "intentionality": "known cause; no valid warrant", "reference": "credit-563@txn-6" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-122" }, { "english": "Why did Diego credit the returned deposit credit-563@txn-6?", "ainglish": "justification-question(credit-563@txn-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "payments", "intentionality": "known cause; no valid warrant", "reference": "credit-563@txn-6" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-123" }, { "english": "Why did Nadia credit the returned deposit credit-574@txn-7?", "ainglish": "cause-question(credit-574@txn-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "payments", "intentionality": "valid warrant; proximate cause unknown", "reference": "credit-574@txn-7" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-124" }, { "english": "Why did Farah credit the returned deposit credit-574@txn-7?", "ainglish": "justification-question(credit-574@txn-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "payments", "intentionality": "valid warrant; proximate cause unknown", "reference": "credit-574@txn-7" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-125" }, { "english": "Why did Kwame credit the returned deposit credit-585@txn-8?", "ainglish": "cause-question(credit-585@txn-8)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "payments", "intentionality": "one fact may be both cause and warrant", "reference": "credit-585@txn-8" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-126" }, { "english": "Why did Hugo credit the returned deposit credit-585@txn-8?", "ainglish": "justification-question(credit-585@txn-8)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "payments", "intentionality": "one fact may be both cause and warrant", "reference": "credit-585@txn-8" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-127" }, { "english": "Why did Lucia credit the returned deposit credit-596@txn-9?", "ainglish": "cause-question(credit-596@txn-9)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "payments", "intentionality": "accidental event; no attributable choice", "reference": "credit-596@txn-9" }, "options": [ "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-128" }, { "english": "Why did Iris credit the returned deposit credit-596@txn-9?", "ainglish": "justification-question(credit-596@txn-9)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "payments", "intentionality": "accidental event; no attributable choice", "reference": "credit-596@txn-9" }, "options": [ "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-129" }, { "english": "Why did Petra shorten the quarterly review shorten-565@slot-5?", "ainglish": "cause-question(shorten-565@slot-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "scheduling", "intentionality": "coercion", "reference": "shorten-565@slot-5" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-130" }, { "english": "Why did Jonas shorten the quarterly review shorten-565@slot-5?", "ainglish": "justification-question(shorten-565@slot-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "scheduling", "intentionality": "coercion", "reference": "shorten-565@slot-5" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-131" }, { "english": "Why did Sandeep shorten the quarterly review shorten-576@slot-6?", "ainglish": "cause-question(shorten-576@slot-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "scheduling", "intentionality": "automation executing a policy", "reference": "shorten-576@slot-6" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-132" }, { "english": "Why did Katja shorten the quarterly review shorten-576@slot-6?", "ainglish": "justification-question(shorten-576@slot-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "scheduling", "intentionality": "automation executing a policy", "reference": "shorten-576@slot-6" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-133" }, { "english": "Why did Chiara shorten the quarterly review shorten-587@slot-7?", "ainglish": "cause-question(shorten-587@slot-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "scheduling", "intentionality": "authorized act produced by a bug", "reference": "shorten-587@slot-7" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-134" }, { "english": "Why did Malik shorten the quarterly review shorten-587@slot-7?", "ainglish": "justification-question(shorten-587@slot-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "scheduling", "intentionality": "authorized act produced by a bug", "reference": "shorten-587@slot-7" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-135" }, { "english": "Why did Yusuf shorten the quarterly review shorten-598@slot-8?", "ainglish": "cause-question(shorten-598@slot-8)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "scheduling", "intentionality": "unjustified act with a complete trace", "reference": "shorten-598@slot-8" }, "options": [ "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-136" }, { "english": "Why did Nadja shorten the quarterly review shorten-598@slot-8?", "ainglish": "justification-question(shorten-598@slot-8)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "scheduling", "intentionality": "unjustified act with a complete trace", "reference": "shorten-598@slot-8" }, "options": [ "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-137" }, { "english": "Why did Greta shorten the quarterly review shorten-609@slot-9?", "ainglish": "cause-question(shorten-609@slot-9)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "scheduling", "intentionality": "known cause; no valid warrant", "reference": "shorten-609@slot-9" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-138" }, { "english": "Why did Otto shorten the quarterly review shorten-609@slot-9?", "ainglish": "justification-question(shorten-609@slot-9)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "scheduling", "intentionality": "known cause; no valid warrant", "reference": "shorten-609@slot-9" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-139" }, { "english": "Why did Omar expire the shared admin session expire-578@gate-5?", "ainglish": "cause-question(expire-578@gate-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "access control", "intentionality": "valid warrant; proximate cause unknown", "reference": "expire-578@gate-5" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-140" }, { "english": "Why did Paula expire the shared admin session expire-578@gate-5?", "ainglish": "justification-question(expire-578@gate-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "access control", "intentionality": "valid warrant; proximate cause unknown", "reference": "expire-578@gate-5" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-141" }, { "english": "Why did Lena expire the shared admin session expire-589@gate-6?", "ainglish": "cause-question(expire-589@gate-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "access control", "intentionality": "one fact may be both cause and warrant", "reference": "expire-589@gate-6" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-142" }, { "english": "Why did Quentin expire the shared admin session expire-589@gate-6?", "ainglish": "justification-question(expire-589@gate-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "access control", "intentionality": "one fact may be both cause and warrant", "reference": "expire-589@gate-6" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-143" }, { "english": "Why did Rafael expire the shared admin session expire-600@gate-7?", "ainglish": "cause-question(expire-600@gate-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "access control", "intentionality": "accidental event; no attributable choice", "reference": "expire-600@gate-7" }, "options": [ "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-144" }, { "english": "Why did Rosa expire the shared admin session expire-600@gate-7?", "ainglish": "justification-question(expire-600@gate-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "access control", "intentionality": "accidental event; no attributable choice", "reference": "expire-600@gate-7" }, "options": [ "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-145" }, { "english": "Why did Tessa expire the shared admin session expire-611@gate-8?", "ainglish": "cause-question(expire-611@gate-8)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "access control", "intentionality": "coercion", "reference": "expire-611@gate-8" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-146" }, { "english": "Why did Sven expire the shared admin session expire-611@gate-8?", "ainglish": "justification-question(expire-611@gate-8)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "access control", "intentionality": "coercion", "reference": "expire-611@gate-8" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-147" }, { "english": "Why did Milo expire the shared admin session expire-622@gate-9?", "ainglish": "cause-question(expire-622@gate-9)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "access control", "intentionality": "automation executing a policy", "reference": "expire-622@gate-9" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-148" }, { "english": "Why did Tara expire the shared admin session expire-622@gate-9?", "ainglish": "justification-question(expire-622@gate-9)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "access control", "intentionality": "automation executing a policy", "reference": "expire-622@gate-9" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-149" }, { "english": "Why did Anja evacuate the east test bay evacuate-591@drill-5?", "ainglish": "cause-question(evacuate-591@drill-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "safety", "intentionality": "authorized act produced by a bug", "reference": "evacuate-591@drill-5" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-150" }, { "english": "Why did Umar evacuate the east test bay evacuate-591@drill-5?", "ainglish": "justification-question(evacuate-591@drill-5)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "safety", "intentionality": "authorized act produced by a bug", "reference": "evacuate-591@drill-5" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-151" }, { "english": "Why did Viktor evacuate the east test bay evacuate-602@drill-6?", "ainglish": "cause-question(evacuate-602@drill-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "safety", "intentionality": "unjustified act with a complete trace", "reference": "evacuate-602@drill-6" }, "options": [ "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-152" }, { "english": "Why did Vera evacuate the east test bay evacuate-602@drill-6?", "ainglish": "justification-question(evacuate-602@drill-6)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "safety", "intentionality": "unjustified act with a complete trace", "reference": "evacuate-602@drill-6" }, "options": [ "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-153" }, { "english": "Why did Noor evacuate the east test bay evacuate-613@drill-7?", "ainglish": "cause-question(evacuate-613@drill-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "safety", "intentionality": "known cause; no valid warrant", "reference": "evacuate-613@drill-7" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-154" }, { "english": "Why did Wim evacuate the east test bay evacuate-613@drill-7?", "ainglish": "justification-question(evacuate-613@drill-7)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "safety", "intentionality": "known cause; no valid warrant", "reference": "evacuate-613@drill-7" }, "options": [ "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-155" }, { "english": "Why did Diego evacuate the east test bay evacuate-624@drill-8?", "ainglish": "cause-question(evacuate-624@drill-8)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "safety", "intentionality": "valid warrant; proximate cause unknown", "reference": "evacuate-624@drill-8" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-156" }, { "english": "Why did Xenia evacuate the east test bay evacuate-624@drill-8?", "ainglish": "justification-question(evacuate-624@drill-8)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "safety", "intentionality": "valid warrant; proximate cause unknown", "reference": "evacuate-624@drill-8" }, "options": [ "what would undo it or bring the prior state back", "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-157" }, { "english": "Why did Farah evacuate the east test bay evacuate-635@drill-9?", "ainglish": "cause-question(evacuate-635@drill-9)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "cause-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "cause-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "safety", "intentionality": "one fact may be both cause and warrant", "reference": "evacuate-635@drill-9" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the chain of events, decisions, or faults that brought it about", "id": "r28-cjq-caus-bare-158" }, { "english": "Why did Yannis evacuate the east test bay evacuate-635@drill-9?", "ainglish": "justification-question(evacuate-635@drill-9)?", "question": "Which of these answers what was asked — and nothing further?", "form": "justification-question", "comparator": "bare", "settlement_stratum": "justification-question-bare", "strata": { "domain": "safety", "intentionality": "one fact may be both cause and warrant", "reference": "evacuate-635@drill-9" }, "options": [ "the question presumes both a producing process and a justifying basis", "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "who is at fault, and how much they should answer for", "what would undo it or bring the prior state back" ], "answer": "the rule, permission, aim, or trade-off that justified it, including that nothing did", "id": "r28-cjq-just-bare-159" }, { "id": "r28-cjq-cal-01", "calibration": true, "english": "The maintenance log mentions the torque value for bolt 12, but withholds the value.", "ainglish": "The maintenance log records the torque value for bolt 12: 41 Nm.", "question": "What does the maintenance log give for the torque value for bolt 12?", "options": [ "17 Nm", "88 Nm", "the record does not state it", "41 Nm" ], "answer": "41 Nm", "probe": "answerable planted-effect control: value withheld vs value stated" }, { "id": "r28-cjq-cal-02", "calibration": true, "english": "The shipping note mentions the pallet's destination dock, but withholds the value.", "ainglish": "The shipping note records the pallet's destination dock: dock 4.", "question": "What does the shipping note give for the pallet's destination dock?", "options": [ "dock 2", "the record does not state it", "dock 4", "dock 9" ], "answer": "dock 4", "probe": "answerable planted-effect control: value withheld vs value stated" }, { "id": "r28-cjq-cal-03", "calibration": true, "english": "The trial protocol mentions the washout period, but withholds the value.", "ainglish": "The trial protocol records the washout period: nine days.", "question": "What does the trial protocol give for the washout period?", "options": [ "the record does not state it", "nine days", "three days", "twenty days" ], "answer": "nine days", "probe": "answerable planted-effect control: value withheld vs value stated" }, { "id": "r28-cjq-cal-04", "calibration": true, "english": "The incident summary mentions the failing sensor, but withholds the value.", "ainglish": "The incident summary records the failing sensor: sensor B7.", "question": "What does the incident summary give for the failing sensor?", "options": [ "sensor B7", "sensor A2", "sensor C5", "the record does not state it" ], "answer": "sensor B7", "probe": "answerable planted-effect control: value withheld vs value stated" }, { "id": "r28-cjq-cal-05", "calibration": true, "english": "The lab notebook mentions the incubation temperature, but withholds the value.", "ainglish": "The lab notebook records the incubation temperature: 31 degrees.", "question": "What does the lab notebook give for the incubation temperature?", "options": [ "18 degrees", "44 degrees", "the record does not state it", "31 degrees" ], "answer": "31 degrees", "probe": "answerable planted-effect control: value withheld vs value stated" }, { "id": "r28-cjq-cal-06", "calibration": true, "english": "The supplier letter mentions the revised lead time, but withholds the value.", "ainglish": "The supplier letter records the revised lead time: six weeks.", "question": "What does the supplier letter give for the revised lead time?", "options": [ "eleven weeks", "the record does not state it", "six weeks", "two weeks" ], "answer": "six weeks", "probe": "answerable planted-effect control: value withheld vs value stated" }, { "id": "r28-cjq-cal-07", "calibration": true, "english": "The audit memo mentions the sampled invoice count, but withholds the value.", "ainglish": "The audit memo records the sampled invoice count: 240 invoices.", "question": "What does the audit memo give for the sampled invoice count?", "options": [ "the record does not state it", "240 invoices", "90 invoices", "610 invoices" ], "answer": "240 invoices", "probe": "answerable planted-effect control: value withheld vs value stated" }, { "id": "r28-cjq-cal-08", "calibration": true, "english": "The field report mentions the affected watershed, but withholds the value.", "ainglish": "The field report records the affected watershed: the north basin.", "question": "What does the field report give for the affected watershed?", "options": [ "the north basin", "the east basin", "the south basin", "the record does not state it" ], "answer": "the north basin", "probe": "answerable planted-effect control: value withheld vs value stated" }, { "id": "r28-cjq-cal-09", "calibration": true, "english": "The build manifest mentions the pinned compiler release, but withholds the value.", "ainglish": "The build manifest records the pinned compiler release: clang 18.1.3.", "question": "What does the build manifest give for the pinned compiler release?", "options": [ "clang 16.0.6", "clang 20.0.0", "the record does not state it", "clang 18.1.3" ], "answer": "clang 18.1.3", "probe": "answerable planted-effect control: value withheld vs value stated" }, { "id": "r28-cjq-cal-10", "calibration": true, "english": "The catering order mentions the confirmed headcount, but withholds the value.", "ainglish": "The catering order records the confirmed headcount: 72 guests.", "question": "What does the catering order give for the confirmed headcount?", "options": [ "110 guests", "the record does not state it", "72 guests", "45 guests" ], "answer": "72 guests", "probe": "answerable planted-effect control: value withheld vs value stated" }, { "id": "r28-cjq-cal-11", "calibration": true, "english": "The inspection sheet mentions the cracked weld identifier, but withholds the value.", "ainglish": "The inspection sheet records the cracked weld identifier: weld W-31.", "question": "What does the inspection sheet give for the cracked weld identifier?", "options": [ "the record does not state it", "weld W-31", "weld W-12", "weld W-47" ], "answer": "weld W-31", "probe": "answerable planted-effect control: value withheld vs value stated" }, { "id": "r28-cjq-cal-12", "calibration": true, "english": "The recovery plan mentions the restore point used, but withholds the value.", "ainglish": "The recovery plan records the restore point used: checkpoint 88.", "question": "What does the recovery plan give for the restore point used?", "options": [ "checkpoint 88", "checkpoint 41", "checkpoint 63", "the record does not state it" ], "answer": "checkpoint 88", "probe": "answerable planted-effect control: value withheld vs value stated" }, { "id": "r28-cjq-cal-13", "calibration": true, "english": "The grant summary mentions the awarded amount, but withholds the value.", "ainglish": "The grant summary records the awarded amount: 18,500 euros.", "question": "What does the grant summary give for the awarded amount?", "options": [ "9,000 euros", "26,750 euros", "the record does not state it", "18,500 euros" ], "answer": "18,500 euros", "probe": "answerable planted-effect control: value withheld vs value stated" }, { "id": "r28-cjq-cal-14", "calibration": true, "english": "The migration log mentions the schema version applied, but withholds the value.", "ainglish": "The migration log records the schema version applied: version 42.", "question": "What does the migration log give for the schema version applied?", "options": [ "version 51", "the record does not state it", "version 42", "version 37" ], "answer": "version 42", "probe": "answerable planted-effect control: value withheld vs value stated" }, { "id": "r28-cjq-cal-15", "calibration": true, "english": "The safety bulletin mentions the recalled batch code, but withholds the value.", "ainglish": "The safety bulletin records the recalled batch code: batch K-19.", "question": "What does the safety bulletin give for the recalled batch code?", "options": [ "the record does not state it", "batch K-19", "batch K-07", "batch K-24" ], "answer": "batch K-19", "probe": "answerable planted-effect control: value withheld vs value stated" }, { "id": "r28-cjq-cal-16", "calibration": true, "english": "The lease abstract mentions the break clause notice, but withholds the value.", "ainglish": "The lease abstract records the break clause notice: ninety days.", "question": "What does the lease abstract give for the break clause notice?", "options": [ "ninety days", "thirty days", "sixty days", "the record does not state it" ], "answer": "ninety days", "probe": "answerable planted-effect control: value withheld vs value stated" } ], "n_real": 160, "n_calibration": 16 }